The Journal of Rheumatology
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5484
(FIVE YEARS 989)

H-INDEX

83
(FIVE YEARS 13)

Published By The Journal Of Rheumatology

1499-2752, 0315-162x

2022 ◽  
pp. jrheum.210871
Author(s):  
Sofia Pazmino ◽  
Anikó Lovik ◽  
René Westhovens ◽  
Patrick Verschueren

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can cause significant burden to patients. Some of these aspects are directly related to disease activity and are manageable with antirheumatic drugs, whereas others require nonpharmacological interventions.


2022 ◽  
pp. jrheum.211167
Author(s):  
Gang Wang ◽  
Ning Zhuo ◽  
Jingyang Li

We read the recent article by Sugawara et al with great interest.1 The authors described a 65-year-old patient with rheumatoid arthritis who had been treated with methotrexate for 14 years without any adverse effects, yet within the last 6 months had developed fever and abdominal pain when treated with 2 mg/day of tacrolimus and 4 mg of baricitinib.


2022 ◽  
pp. jrheum.200609
Author(s):  
Majed Mustafa Khraishi ◽  
Valencia P. Remple ◽  
Samuel Silverberg ◽  
Jacqueline C. Stewart ◽  
Brandusa Florica ◽  
...  

Objective COMPLETE-PsA was an observational study of biologic-naïve Canadian adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with adalimumab or a non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (nbDMARDs) regimen, after inadequate response/intolerance to a current nbDMARD treatment regimen. The aim of this analysis was to assess 12-month effectiveness of adalimumab versus nbDMARDs. Methods Patients enrolled between March 2012 and November 2017 were included. The following clinical parameters and patient-reported outcomes were collected/calculated per routine care: DAPSA28, DAS28, ESR, CRP, MDGA, PtGA, pain, HAQ-DI, SF-12, enthesitis, dactylitis, BSA, and time to achieving ACR50, ACR70 and modified MDA (mMDA). Results Two hundred seventy-seven adalimumab-treated and 148 nbDMARD-treated patients were included. At baseline, adalimumab-treated patients were less likely to be employed; had longer morning stiffness; higher DAPSA28, DAS28, MDGA, PtGA, pain, and HAQ-DI; and lower prevalence of dactylitis (all p<0.05). Adalimumab-treated patients showed lower baseline-adjusted DAPSA28 (16.5 vs. 26.6), DAS28 (2.8 vs. 3.9), MDGA (25.3 vs. 37.1), and ESR (10.2 vs. 15.4 mm/hr) after 3 months compared to nbDMARD-treated patients, with observed improvements maintained to month 12. Time to achievement of ACR50, ACR70, and mMDA was significantly (p<0.01) shorter among adalimumab-treated patients, with the likelihood of having dactylitis [OR: 0.4 (0.2–0.6)] and BSA<3% [2.7 (1.5–5.0)] significantly lower and higher, respectively. Switching to another biologic was less likely in adalimumab-treated vs. nbDMARD -treated patients (HR [95% CI]: 0.3 [0.2-0.5]). Conclusion In a real-world Canadian PsA population, adalimumab was more effective than nbDMARDs at reducing disease activity and the severity of skin involvement and demonstrated higher retention.


2022 ◽  
pp. jrheum.211178
Author(s):  
Eri Sugawara ◽  
Kazuo Matsui ◽  
Yoshiharu Amasaki

We sincerely thank Dr. Wang et al for their comments in response to our article, "Cytomegalovirus Enteritis in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Baricitinib."1 Our case report had demonstrated increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection under the combination therapy of baricitinib and tacrolimus.


2022 ◽  
pp. jrheum.211233
Author(s):  
Lisa Zickuhr ◽  
Brian F. Mandell

Health disparities in the delivery and outcomes of clinical care exist across the spectrum of patients with rheumatic diseases. In a retrospective analysis of the Corrona registry, patients with rheumatoid arthritis identifying as racial or ethnic minorities achieved lower rates of remission or low disease activity scores and reported poorer functional status compared to White patients.1


2022 ◽  
pp. jrheum.211285
Author(s):  
Puja Khanna

Any human who has ever experienced an acute gout flare understands how painful and debilitating this condition is. Unfortunately, due to the episodic nature of these acute flares that occur randomly due to transient fluctuations in urate levels, patients often underreport these attacks.


2022 ◽  
pp. jrheum.210755
Author(s):  
Karoline Walscheid ◽  
Kai Rothaus ◽  
Martina Niewerth ◽  
Jens Klotsche ◽  
Kirsten Minden ◽  
...  

Objective Data on uveitis in juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA), a category of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), are scarce. We describe prevalence and risk factors for JPsA-associated uveitis (JPsA-U). Methods Cross-sectional data from the National Pediatric Rheumatological Database (from 2002 to 2014) were used to characterize JPsA-U and assess risk factors for uveitis development. Results Uveitis developed in 6.6% of 1862 JPsA patients. JPsA-U patients were more frequently female (73.0 vs 62.9%, p=0.031), ANA positive (60.3 vs 37.0%, p<0.001), younger at JPsA onset (5.3 ± 4.1 vs 9.3 ± 4.4 years, p<0.001), and received DMARD (disease modifying antirheumatic drug) treatment significantly more frequently than JPsA patients without uveitis. On multivariable analysis of a subgroup of 655 patients, mean cJADAS during study documentation was significantly associated with uveitis development. Children with early onset of JPsA were significantly more frequently ANA positive (48.4% vs 35.7% for those younger than 5 years at JPsA onset versus those aged 5 years and older, p<0.001), less often affected by skin disease (55.3% vs 61.0%, p=0.032), but more frequently by uveitis (17.3% vs 3.8%, p<0.001), and required DMARD treatment more frequently (52.9% vs 43.8%, p<0.001). Conclusion The characteristics of JPsA patients developing uveitis are similar to those of patients with uveitis in other JIA categories, such as oligoarticular JIA. Especially those children with early onset of JPsA seem to be at a higher risk for ocular involvement. Our data support the notion of a major clinical difference between those patients with early versus late onset of JPsA.


2022 ◽  
pp. jrheum.211148
Author(s):  
Jessica Widdifield ◽  
Lihi Eder ◽  
Simon Chen ◽  
Jeffrey C. Kwong ◽  
Carol Hitchon ◽  
...  

Objective We assessed COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) and the Ontario general population. Methods We studied all residents 16 years and older who were alive and enrolled in Ontario's universal health insurance plan as of December 14, 2020 when vaccination commenced (n=12,435,914). Individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (PsO), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were identified using established disease-specific case definitions applied to health administrative data. Vaccination status was extracted from the provincial COVaxON registry. Weekly cumulative proportions of first and second doses up until October 3, 2021 were expressed as the vaccinated percentage of each disease group, and compared to the general Ontario population, and stratified by age. Results By October 3, 2021, the cumulative percentage with at least one dose was 82.1% for the general population, 88.9% for RA, 87.4% for AS, 90.6% for PsA, 87.3% for PsO, and 87.0% for IBD. There was also a higher total cumulative percentage with two doses among IMIDs (83.8-88.2%) vs the general population (78.0%). The difference was also evident when stratifying by age. Individuals with IMIDs in the youngest age group initially had earlier uptake than the general population but remain the lowest age group with two doses (70.6% in the general population vs. 73.7-79.2% across IMID groups). Conclusion While implementation of COVID-19 vaccination programs has differed globally, these Canadian estimates are the first to reassuringly show higher COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals with IMIDs.


2022 ◽  
pp. jrheum.210863
Author(s):  
Marco Fornaro ◽  
Vincenzo Venerito ◽  
Florenzo Iannone ◽  
Fabio Cacciapaglia

Vaccination today represents the first defence against the effects of the Coronavirus disease 2019, mainly in rheumatic patients, where an increased risk for hospitalization and death has been reported (1,2). The previous studies on the safety and tolerability of BNT162b2 mRNA-SARS-CoV-2 (3) vaccine in patients affected with rheumatic diseases(RDs) included predominantly patients with inflammatory arthritis (4-6). This study was focused on patients affected with rare RDs and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to assess the safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and possible disease flares after vaccination.


2022 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
Markus Bredemeier ◽  
Roberto Ranza ◽  
Adriana M. Kakehasi ◽  
Aline Ranzolin ◽  
Inês G. da Silveira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document