scholarly journals Improvement of glycemic control and reduction of major cardiovascular events in 18 cardiovascular outcome trials: an updated meta-regression

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Ida Maiorino ◽  
Miriam Longo ◽  
Lorenzo Scappaticcio ◽  
Giuseppe Bellastella ◽  
Paolo Chiodini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Major Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Q Statistic

Abstract Background Besides providing reassurance about cardiovascular (CV) safety of newer diabetes drugs, cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) have also shown encouraging benefits on some CV endpoints. The contribution of the better glycemic control in the reduction of major cardiovascular events (MACE) remains an open question. The aim of this study is to evaluate the associations between the reduction of HbA1c and risk of MACE, MACE components, hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and all-cause death in CVOTs. Methods An electronic search up to July 2021 was conducted to determine eligible trials. Systematic review identified eighteen CVOTs reporting prespecified CV outcomes. Pooled summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated according to the random effects model using the Paule-Mandel method; restricted maximum likelihood estimators were used to estimate model parameters in the metaregression. Results The eighteen CVOTs evaluated 161,156 patients and included four trials with dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), eight trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and six trials with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). Random-effects model meta-analysis showed an association between treatment and risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.86, 0.94, P < 0.001), with significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 45.2%, Q statistic P = 0.040). In meta-regression, there was an association between the reduction in HbA1c at the end of the trial and the HR reduction for MACE (beta =  − 0.298, P = 0.007), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 40%, Q statistic P = 0.04); this association was totally driven by the risk reduction of non-fatal stroke, which explained 100% of between-study variance (beta =  − 0.531, R2 = 100%), without heterogeneity (I2 = 24%, Q statistic P = 0.206). There was no association between the reduction in HbA1c and the HR for heart failure or all-cause death. Conclusions The reduction of HbA1c in eighteen CVOTs was significantly associated with reduction of non-fatal stroke, explaining all (R2 = 100%) of the between-study variance. While the contribution of glucose lowering in some CV benefits of newer agents does not influence their indications for the patient with type 2 diabetes, it may hopefully facilitate their use.

4113Glucose lowering drugs or strategies, major adverse cardiovascular events and heart failure outcomes, and association with weight loss - meta-analysis of large cardiovascular outcome trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O R Ghosh-Swaby ◽  
S G Goodman ◽  
L A Leiter ◽  
A Cheng ◽  
K Connelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Lower Weight ◽  
Meta Regression

Abstract Background Glucose lowering drugs or strategies (GLDS) have varied effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure (HF) in cardiovascular outcomes trials. Mechanisms driving cardiovascular risk reduction remain elusive. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and meeting abstracts up to 11/21/2018 for large GLDS cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) in patients with or at risk for type 2 diabetes. Primary endpoints of MACE and HF were evaluated with random effects risk ratios (RR) and explored by baseline CVD subgroups and meta-regression by weight change across treatment arms. Results In 27 GLDS CVOTs, a total 207,820 patients, median age 63 years, 64% male, 64% CVD and 11% with prior HF were studied over a mean 3.8 years with 20,118 (10%) patients having MACE and 7,212 (4%) a HF event. Compared with standard care, GLDS overall lowered MACE (RR 0.92, P<0.ehz745.01171) but not HF (RR 1.01, P=0.91). Across GLDS, the magnitude and directionality varied modestly for MACE RR (P-int=0.07) but markedly for HF (P-int<0.ehz745.01171). Meta-regression showed a change in HF RR by 6% (95% CI 3%-9%) per 1 kg weight gain/loss between treatment arms (P=0.0006; Figure). In 9 trials of GLDS that achieved marked weight loss (lifestyle, GLP1 agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors), MACE benefit was confined to patients with baseline CVD (RR 0.89 [0.84–0.95] versus without (RR 1.02 [0.91–1.15]; P-int=0.01) with consistent HF effect (RR 0.80 [0.72–0.88] vs RR 0.76 [0.56–1.03]; P-int=0.74). Heart Failure Risk and Changes in Weight Conclusion HF outcomes were improved with GLDS that lower weight. Among diabetes GLDS that lower weight, there was a robust risk reduction in atherothrombotic and heart failure events, with the MACE benefit confined to patients with established CVD. Acknowledgement/Funding Heart and Stroke Foundation

scholarly journals α-Linolenic Acid and Risk of Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiandi Wu ◽  
Min Qiu ◽  
Lichang Sun ◽  
Jiangxiong Wen ◽  
Dong-liang Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Linolenic Acid ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Measuring Method ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Hazard Ratios

Background: The α-linolenic acid is a plant origin n-3 fatty acid that may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the effect of α-linolenic acid (ALA) on the risk of heart failure (HF) remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the role of ALA in the risk of incident HF.Methods: Electronic databases were searched for studies up to August 10, 2021. Studies were included for meta-analysis if the adjusted risk of HF in different dietary intake or circulating levels of ALA was reported. We used the random-effects model to calculate the estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for higher ALA.Results: A total of 6 studies (7 cohorts) comprising 135,270 participants were included for meta-analysis. After a median follow-up duration of 10 years, 5,905 cases of HF were recorded. No significant heterogeneity was observed among all the included studies. Random-effects model analyses showed that there was no significant association between ALA and the risk of incident HF, either assessed as quintiles (highest quintile vs. lowest quintile: HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.86–1.06) or per 1 SD increment (HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.95–1.01). Furthermore, we did not observe any association between ALA and the risk of HF in subgroup analyses performed according to age, sex, follow-up duration, and measuring method of ALA.Conclusions: We found no association between ALA and the risk of incident HF, suggesting that ALA might not be effective in the prevention of HF.

scholarly journals Series: Cardiovascular outcome trials for diabetes drugs Liraglutide and LEADER

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-144
Author(s):  
Miles Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Major Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trial ◽  
Outcome Trial

LEADER (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results) was an FDA-mandated cardiovascular outcome trial with liraglutide and was the first trial with a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist to demonstrate a significant reduction in cardiovascular events. It compared liraglutide and placebo in 9,340 people with type 2 diabetes and either existing cardiovascular disease or age >60 years with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. LEADER demonstrated superiority for major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke), and cardiovascular deaths were significantly reduced, as was all-cause mortality. Hospitalisation for heart failure, which was a secondary outcome, was not significantly reduced. Compared with the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, the curves for major adverse cardiovascular events in LEADER separated later, and the absence of a clear effect on hospitalisation for heart failure or on estimated glomerular filtration rate suggests that the mechanism of cardiovascular benefit for liraglutide was different from that for empagliflozin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document