scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of preoperative 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and mitomycin C in combination with radiotherapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a long-term follow-up study

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Endo ◽  
Minoru Kitago ◽  
Koichi Aiura ◽  
Masahiro Shinoda ◽  
Hiroshi Yagi ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 315-315
Author(s):  
Taizo Hibi ◽  
Minoru Kitago ◽  
Koichi Aiura ◽  
Minoru Tanabe ◽  
Osamu Itano ◽  
...  

315 Background: Because of the high incidence of local recurrence and liver metastasis, long-term outcomes of patients following resection of advanced pancreatic cancer are extremely poor. Facilitation of curative resection and prevention of micrometastasis are the goals of neoadjuvant therapy. We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of our neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) protocol for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients. Methods: During the period between 2003 and 2011, 24 patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancers underwent NACRT comprising 5-FU (300 mg/body/day, day 1−5/week for 4 weeks), cisplatin (10mg/body day2, 9, 16, 23), mitomycin C (4mg/body/day, day 1, 8, 15, and 22), heparin (6000 IU/body/day for 4 weeks), and radiation (2 Gy/day, day 1−5/week for 4 weeks, total 40 Gy). They were reevaluated for resectability after therapy. Primary endpoints were toxicity and overall patient and disease-free survivals. Secondary endpoint was the ratio of microscopically margin negative resection. Results: All 24 patients completedNACRT. Grade 3−4 hematological adverse events were observed in 9 (38%) patients but none developed severe gastrointestinal toxicity. In 7 (29%) patients, restaging revealed distant metastasis or local disease progression not amenable to curative resection. The remaining 17 patients (71%) underwent surgery (pancreatoduodenectomy, 13 and distal pancreatectomy, 4) with zero 30-day postoperative or in-hospital mortality. The 5-year overall all patient and disease-free survival rates after pancreatectomy were 52.6% and 36.3%, respectively. Postoperative histopathological evaluation demonstrated a marked degenerative change in the specimen, achieving negative surgical margins in 15/17 (88%) patients and pathological complete response in the remaining 2 (12%) patients. Conclusions: Our NACRT protocol is feasible with a low toxicity profile and an excellent curative resection rate in the treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. It is a promising regimen associated with improved long-term prognoses than historical controls.


Clinics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jair Giampani Junior ◽  
Adriana Silva Borges-Giampani ◽  
José Carlos Eudes Carani ◽  
Ernst Werner Oltrogge ◽  
Remo Susanna Junior

2006 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bauer ◽  
E. Ben-Menachem ◽  
G. Kramer ◽  
W. Fryze ◽  
S. Da Silva ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 327-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vignesh ◽  
S. E. Hoffe ◽  
R. Shridhar ◽  
J. Klapman ◽  
J. S. Barthel

327 Background: Fiducial markers implanted into tumors that move with respiration facilitate planning for SBRT. To date, there is little evidence regarding the safety and utility of EUS implanted markers for “borderline resectable” pancreatic cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 13 patients (7 men and 6 women) with “borderline resectable” pancreatic cancer as per NCCN guidelines. EUS-guided fiducial placement for stereotactic body radiation therapy was performed between January 2009 and September 2010. Gold cylindrical fiducials (0.35mmx 10mm or 0.75 mm X 10 mm; VISICOIL) were loaded into a 22g or 19 g EUS needle. With the needle in the target, the fiducial was deployed by retracting the needle and advancing the stylet. EUS confirmed fiducial position after deployment. A mean of 3 fiducials were placed (range 1-6) per patient. Fiducial position was analyzed at 4D CT simulation and daily cone beam imaging prior to SBRT. Results: Fiducial placement was successful in all. Technical difficulty was encountered in 2 patients secondary to retained food in stomach and uncinate tumors. Smaller (10x0.35mm) fiducials were successfully placed in these 2 patients. 3 patients had abdominal pain lasting < 12 hours after fiducial placement but none had any acute complications. In 2 patients, change in fiducial position was noted on follow-up cone beam CT. This apparent change in position was related to biliary drainage, gastric distension and a pre-existing pseudocyst. Though this is not indicative of fiducial migration, it impacts radiation planning and delivery. No complications were noted at the end of a mean follow-up period of 6 months. Conclusions: EUS fiducial placement to assist with stereotactic body radiation for “borderline resectable” pancreatic cancer is safe, feasible, and technically successful in most cases. True migration did not occur but other factors may cause an apparent change in fiducial position. Further studies are planned to optimize the best configuration of fiducial placement by virtue of tumor location for SBRT planning and treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Endocrine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 386-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baldomero Gonzales-Virla ◽  
Guadalupe Vargas-Ortega ◽  
Karen-Belen Martínez-Vázquez ◽  
Ana Laura Espinosa de lo Monteros ◽  
Ernesto Sosa-Erosa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document