scholarly journals Sustainability of collaborative care management for depression in primary care settings with academic affiliations across New York State

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Moise ◽  
Ravi N. Shah ◽  
Susan Essock ◽  
Amy Jones ◽  
Jay Carruthers ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah J. Bowen ◽  
Ashley Heald ◽  
Erin LePoire ◽  
Amy Jones ◽  
Danielle Gadbois ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Collaborative Care Model is a well-established, evidence-based approach to treating depression and other common behavioral health conditions in primary care settings. Despite a robust evidence base, real world implementation of Collaborative Care has been limited and very slow. The goal of this analysis is to better understand the relationship between training, technical assistance, and implementation in the largest state-led Collaborative Care program in the nation—the New York State Collaborative Care Medicaid Program.Data are presented using the RE-AIM model, examining the proportion of clinics in each of the model’s five stages from 2014 to 2019.MethodsWe used the RE-AIM model to shape our data presentation, focusing on the proportion of clinics moving into each of the five stages of this model over the years of implementation. Data sources included: a New York State Office of Mental Health clinic tracking database, billing applications, quarterly reports, and Medicaid claims.ResultsA total lf 84% of clinics with which OMH had an initial contact [n = 611clinics (377 FQHCs and 234 non-FQHCs)] received some form of training and technical assistance. 51% went on to complete a billing application, 41% reported quarterly data at least once, and 20% were able to successfully bill Medicaid. 79% of clinics that reported data maintained Collaborative Care for one year or more. The receipt of any training and technical assistance was significantly associated with our implementation indices: (completed billing application, data reporting, billing Medicaid, and maintaining Collaborative Care). The average percent of patient improvement for depression and anxiety across 155 clinics that had at least one quarter of data was 44.81%. Training and technical assistance source (Office of Mental Health, another source, or both) and intensity (high/low) were significantly related to implementation indices and were observed in FQHC versus non-FQHC samples.ConclusionsOffering Collaborative Care training and technical assistance, particularly high intensity training and technical assistance, increases the likelihood of implementation. Other state-wide organizations might consider the provision of training and technical assistance when assisting clinics to implement Collaborative Care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah J. Bowen ◽  
Ashley Heald ◽  
Erin LePoire ◽  
Amy Jones ◽  
Danielle Gadbois ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Collaborative Care Model is a well-established, evidence-based approach to treating depression and other common behavioral health conditions in primary care settings. Despite a robust evidence base, real world implementation of Collaborative Care has been limited and very slow. The goal of this analysis is to better describe and understand the progression of implementation in the largest state-led Collaborative Care program in the nation—the New York State Collaborative Care Medicaid Program. Data are presented using the RE-AIM model, examining the proportion of clinics in each of the model’s five steps from 2014 to 2019. Methods We used the RE-AIM model to shape our data presentation, focusing on the proportion of clinics moving into each of the five steps of this model over the years of implementation. Data sources included: a New York State Office of Mental Health clinic tracking database, billing applications, quarterly reports, and Medicaid claims. Results A total of 84% of clinics with which OMH had an initial contact [n = 611clinics (377 FQHCs and 234 non-FQHCs)] received some form of training and technical assistance. Of those, 51% went on to complete a billing application, 41% reported quarterly data at least once, and 20% were able to successfully bill Medicaid. Of clinics that reported data prior to the first quarter of 2019, 79% (n = 130) maintained Collaborative Care for 1 year or more. The receipt of any training and technical assistance was significantly associated with our implementation indices: (completed billing application, data reporting, billing Medicaid, and maintaining Collaborative Care). The average percent of patient improvement for depression and anxiety across 155 clinics that had at least one quarter of data was 44.81%. Training and technical assistance source (Office of Mental Health, another source, or both) and intensity (high/low) were significantly related to implementation indices and were observed in FQHC versus non-FQHC samples. Conclusions Offering Collaborative Care training and technical assistance, particularly high intensity training and technical assistance, increases the likelihood of implementation. Other state-wide organizations might consider the provision of training and technical assistance when assisting clinics to implement Collaborative Care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81
Author(s):  
Young Joo Park ◽  
Stephen Weinberg ◽  
Lindsay W. Cogan

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd I. Sederer ◽  
Marisa Derman ◽  
Jay Carruthers ◽  
Melanie Wall

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 743-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jemma Alarcón ◽  
Eric J. Cleghorn ◽  
Edwin M. Rodriguez ◽  
Stephen E. Hughes ◽  
Margaret J. Oxtoby

2021 ◽  
pp. 152715442110181
Author(s):  
Edward Joseph Timmons ◽  
Conor Norris ◽  
Grant Martsolf ◽  
Lusine Poghosyan

The demand for primary care services may surpass the supply of primary care providers, exacerbating challenges with access, quality, and cost in the U.S. health care system. Expanding the supply of, and access to, nurse practitioner (NP) care has been proposed as one method to alleviate these challenges. New York State (NYS) changed its regulatory environment for NPs in 2015. We estimate the impact of expanded NP scope of practice (SOP) regulations in NYS on total care days received by Medicaid beneficiaries from 2015 to 2018 using a model derived from national historical data from 1999 to 2011. We used a longitudinal data policy analysis framework and a generalized difference-in-differences model to identify the effect of changes in NP SOP regulations on total care days. The model included controls for state income and unemployment rates. Our results suggest that the policy change increased total care days provided to patients, but that this difference was not statistically significant and became negligible after computing the number of days per beneficiary. In addition, our results suggest that had NYS moved to a full practice environment, more care days could have been provided to Medicaid patients, and this difference was found to be statistically significant. Our results suggest that states should adopt full NP SOP practice environments to realize measurable benefits of expanded NP SOP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document