Population-based implementation of behavioral health detection and treatment into primary care: Early data from New York State

Background The Collaborative Care Model is a well-established, evidence-based approach to treating depression and other common behavioral health conditions in primary care settings. Despite a robust evidence base, real world implementation of Collaborative Care has been limited and very slow. The goal of this analysis is to better understand the relationship between training, technical assistance, and implementation in the largest state-led Collaborative Care program in the nation—the New York State Collaborative Care Medicaid Program.Data are presented using the RE-AIM model, examining the proportion of clinics in each of the model’s five stages from 2014 to 2019.MethodsWe used the RE-AIM model to shape our data presentation, focusing on the proportion of clinics moving into each of the five stages of this model over the years of implementation. Data sources included: a New York State Office of Mental Health clinic tracking database, billing applications, quarterly reports, and Medicaid claims.ResultsA total lf 84% of clinics with which OMH had an initial contact [n = 611clinics (377 FQHCs and 234 non-FQHCs)] received some form of training and technical assistance. 51% went on to complete a billing application, 41% reported quarterly data at least once, and 20% were able to successfully bill Medicaid. 79% of clinics that reported data maintained Collaborative Care for one year or more. The receipt of any training and technical assistance was significantly associated with our implementation indices: (completed billing application, data reporting, billing Medicaid, and maintaining Collaborative Care). The average percent of patient improvement for depression and anxiety across 155 clinics that had at least one quarter of data was 44.81%. Training and technical assistance source (Office of Mental Health, another source, or both) and intensity (high/low) were significantly related to implementation indices and were observed in FQHC versus non-FQHC samples.ConclusionsOffering Collaborative Care training and technical assistance, particularly high intensity training and technical assistance, increases the likelihood of implementation. Other state-wide organizations might consider the provision of training and technical assistance when assisting clinics to implement Collaborative Care.