scholarly journals In-depth comparison of two quality improvement collaboratives from different healthcare areas based on registry data—possible factors contributing to sustained improvement in outcomes beyond the project time

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrix Algurén ◽  
Annika Nordin ◽  
Boel Andersson-Gäre ◽  
Anette Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Registry Data ◽  
Sustained Improvement ◽  
Quality Improvement Collaboratives

scholarly journals Sustained improvement in nutritional outcomes at two paediatric cystic fibrosis centres after quality improvement collaboratives

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. i81-i89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne P Savant ◽  
LaCrecia J Britton ◽  
Kristofer Petren ◽  
Susanna A McColley ◽  
Hector H Gutierrez
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Sustained Improvement ◽  
Quality Improvement Collaboratives ◽  
Nutritional Outcomes

A national quality improvement effort: Cancer registry data

1995 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Kamell ◽  
Suzanna S. Hoyler ◽  
Jennifer E. Seiffert ◽  
John L. Young ◽  
Donald E. Henson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Registry Data ◽  
Quality Improvement Effort ◽  
Cancer Registry Data ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Improvement Effort

Improving Quality Improvement Collaboratives

2017 ◽  
pp. 243-254
Author(s):  
Priscilla A. Arling ◽  
Edward J. Miech ◽  
Greg W. Arling
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Electronic Communication ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Positive Patient ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Prevention Project ◽  
Geographical Dispersion ◽  
Quality Improvement Collaboratives

For several decades, researchers have studied the comparative effects of face-to-face and electronic communication. Some have claimed that electronic communication is detrimental to outcomes while others have emphasized its advantages. For members of healthcare quality improvement (QI) collaboratives, a mix of both of types of communication is often used, due to geographical dispersion. This chapter examines the outcomes of a specific QI collaborative, the Empira Falls Prevention project in Minnesota, USA. Levels of electronic communication between collaborative members were found to be associated with a positive patient outcome, specifically a reduction in falls. Electronic and face-to-face communication differed in their association with success measures for the collaborative. The findings suggest that the two modes of communication can be leverage to attain maximum benefits from participating in a quality improvement collaborative.

scholarly journals Can We Move the Needle on School Mental Health Quality Through Systematic Quality Improvement Collaboratives?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 478-492
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H. Connors ◽  
Mills Smith-Millman ◽  
Jill H. Bohnenkamp ◽  
Taneisha Carter ◽  
Nancy Lever ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
School Mental Health ◽  
Health Quality ◽  
Quality Improvement Collaboratives
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document