scholarly journals Clinical value of CT-based patient-specific 3D preoperative design combined with conventional instruments in primary total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Lei ◽  
Li Ming Liu ◽  
Yi Xiang ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
Hua Quan Fan ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the operation and early clinical effect in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) about the novel combination of CT-based patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) preoperative design and conventional osteotomy instruments, compared with the conventional method. Methods After a 1:1 propensity score-matching (PSM), patients were matched to the novel technique group and the conventional group, 109 cases in each group. The conventional group adopted a preoperative design based on a full-length radiograph (FLX) and received TKA with conventional osteotomy instruments. The novel technique group used a CT-based patient-specific 3D preoperative design combined with conventional osteotomy instruments; during the surgery, the femoral entry point, femoral valgus osteotomy angle, the fix point of tibial plateau extramedullary guide pin, and the position of tibial extramedullary positioning rod were accurately selected according to the preoperative 3D design to ensure accurate intraoperative implementation. The lower limb alignment, component position, operation time, tourniquet time, hospital stay, blood loss volume, incidence of postoperative complications, visual analog scale (Vas) score, and New Knee Society Score System (NEW-KSS) at 1 day before operation and 1, 6, and 12 months after operation were recorded and compared. Results The novel technique group was significantly better than the conventional group in controlling lateral tibial component angle (LTC) (P < 0.001), and the novel technique group had lower percentages of hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) outliers (P < 0.001) and overcorrection (P = 0.003). The operation time, tourniquet time, and hospital stay of the novel technique group was shorter (P < 0.05). In 1 month after the operation, the novel technique group achieved a significantly better VAS score (P < 0.05), but a similar NEW-KSS score (P > 0.05) when compared with the conventional group. But in 6 and 12 months after surgery, no statistical differences were seen in the above two scores (P > 0.05). Conclusion The novel technique of CT-based patient-specific 3D preoperative design combined with conventional instruments can improve the accuracy of osteotomy in primary total knee arthroplasty, with benefits of significantly reducing pain and rapid recovery during the early postoperative period, but having no obvious effect on outcome after a 1-year follow-up.

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 3617-3623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio M. Navarro ◽  
Eric Y. Wang ◽  
Heather S. Haeberle ◽  
Michael A. Mont ◽  
Viktor E. Krebs ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHAO Fengchao ◽  
LIU Lei ◽  
Zha Guochun ◽  
Yang Guanjie ◽  
Xu Shizhuang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To investigate the changes of prosthesis position after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the dominant and non-dominant sides. Methods A retrospective analysis was made of 132 patients (148 knees) who underwent primary TKA from December 2016 to December 2018 in our hospital. The patients were divided into dominant group (right side) and non-dominant group (left side) according to the position of the three right-handed surgeons. Total operation time, posterior distal femur angle (PDFA), posterior proximal tibia angle (PPTA), malposition rate of femoral prostheses in sagittal, postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were compared between the two groups. Results The mean total operation time was in dominant group was 111.8(111.8±26.9) and in non-dominant group was 113.7(113.7±26.1) (P>0.05). Postoperative sagittal alignment, the mean PDFA was 90.2(90.2°±3.3°) in dominant group and 88.8(88.8°±3.6°) in non-dominant group (P<0.05). The mean PPTA was 84.8(84.8°±2.8°) in dominant group and 85.4(85.4°±3.7°) in non-dominant group (P>0.05). The incidence of malposition of sagittal femoral prosthesis in dominant group was 6/76 (7.9%) and that in non-dominant was 15/72 (20.8%). There was a significant difference between the two groups (χ2=5.083,P=0.024). Postoperative coronal alignment, the mean angle of components placement was 2.1°±4.2° for HKA, 88.7°±2.7° for mLDFA, 89.5°±2.7° for mMPTA in dominant group and 1.6°±4.1° for HKA, 89.0°±2.8° for mLDFA, 89.9°±2.7° for mMPTA in non-dominant group, respectively. There were no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.804 P=0.423, t=-0.564 P= 0.574, t=-1.011 P= 0.314). Conclusion Our study suggests that surgeon handedness is likely to be one of factors that affect the sagittal placement of femoral component. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the potential problems and consider taking extra precautions to mitigate the risk before performing surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document