scholarly journals Patient access to orphan drugs in France

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Bourdoncle ◽  
Blandine Juillard-Condat ◽  
Florence Taboulet
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 923-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua P. Cohen ◽  
Josephine G. Awatin
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mari Minn

AbstractThis article analyses how the regulatory incentives provided by Regulation 141/2000 affect orphan drug development and generic market entry. It seeks to find out how the regulatory incentives work in combination with patent protection, and whether in combination they foster orphan drug innovation and overall patient access, or rather hinder the latter. The article argues that even though the regulatory incentives are targeted to fostering innovation and early generic market access, when combined with patent protection, the generic entry is likely blocked or delayed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim A. Kanters ◽  
W. Ken Redekop ◽  
Leona Hakkaart

Author(s):  
Michael F. Drummond ◽  
David A. Wilson ◽  
Panos Kanavos ◽  
Peter Ubel ◽  
Joan Rovira

Historically, patients with rare diseases have been underserved by commercial drug development. In several jurisdictions, specific legislation has been enacted to encourage the development of drugs for rare diseases (orphan drugs), which would otherwise not be commercially viable. However, because of the small market, these drugs are often very expensive. Under the standard methods of health technology assessment (HTA) incorporating economic evaluation, orphan drugs do not usually prove to be cost-effective and this, coupled with their high cost, means that funding and patient access may be limited. However, these restrictions may not be in line with societal preferences. Therefore, this study discusses whether the standard methods of HTA are adequate for assisting decisions on patient access to and funding of orphan drugs and outlines a research agenda to help understand the societal value of orphan drugs and issues surrounding their development, funding, and use.


2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-401 ◽  

To the Editor:In a recent study in this Journal, Drummond and colleagues (5) attempt to address the question “Whether the standard methods of HTA are adequate for assisting decisions on patient access to and funding of orphan drugs” before proposing “a research agenda to help understand the societal value of orphan drugs and issues surrounding their development, funding, and use.”


Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 296
Author(s):  
Jong Hyuk Lee

This study aimed to analyze four current pathways affecting the listing and post-listing prices of new orphan drugs (ODs) in South Korea. These mechanisms were: (1) essential OD, (2) pharmacoeconomic evaluation (PE) waiver OD, (3) weighted average price OD, and (4) PE OD. We analyzed the ratio of the listing price of 48 new ODs to the average adjusted price (AAP) of seven advanced countries and examined the change in the post-listing price. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the listing and post-listing price changes. The mean and median ratios of the listing price of total new OD to AAP were calculated to be 69.4% and 65.4%, respectively. Essential OD showed the highest mean (93.8%) and median (80.8%) ratios. The mean cumulative price discount rate of the new OD was 7.2% in the third year and 5.7% in the fifth year. The rarity of diseases impacts the listing price of OD, but the political effects of the benefits of OD on the post-listing price of these drugs could not be verified. Further research should be conducted to develop measures that facilitate the practical sharing of budget risks and increase patient access to new ODs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document