scholarly journals Clinical outcome comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and bypass surgery in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
ChuanNan Zhai ◽  
HongLiang Cong ◽  
Kai Hou ◽  
YueCheng Hu ◽  
JingXia Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Repeat Revascularization ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background The optimal revascularization technique in diabetic patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD), including left main CAD and multivessel coronary disease (MVD), remains controversial. The current study aimed to compare adverse clinical endpoints of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods Relevant studies were found from MEDLINE, OVID, Science Direct, Embase and the Cochrane Central database from January 2010 to April 2019. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to express the pooled effect on discontinuous variables. Outcomes evaluated were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events (MACCE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization. Results Sixteen studies were included (18,224 patients). PCI was associated with the increase risk for MACCE (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.38–1.85), cardiac death (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.11–2.80), MI (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.53–2.57), repeat revascularization (RR 2.61, 95% CI 2.08–3.29). The risks for all-cause mortality (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00–1.52) and stroke (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.48–1.03) were similar between two strategies. Stratified analysis based on studies design and duration of follow-up showed largely similar findings with the overall analyses, except for a significant increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04–1.67) in long-term group, and CABG was associated with a higher stroke rate compared to PCI, which are results that were found in RCTs (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.79) and mid-term groups (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23–0.66). Conclusions CABG was superior to PCI for diabetic patients with complex CAD (including left main CAD and/or MVD), but might be associated with a higher risk of stroke mid-term follow-up. Number of Protocol registration PROSPERO CRD 42019138505.

scholarly journals Impact of left ventricular function on clinical outcomes among patients with coronary artery disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1273-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
George CM Siontis ◽  
Mattia Branca ◽  
Patrick Serruys ◽  
Sigmund Silber ◽  
Lorenz Räber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Artery Disease

Aims To investigate the clinical relevance of contemporary cut-offs of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) including an intermediate phenotype with mid-range reduced ejection fraction among patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and results Patient-level data were summarized from five randomized clinical trials in which 6198 patients underwent clinically indicated percutaneous coronary intervention in different clinical settings. We assessed all-cause mortality as primary endpoint at five-year follow-up. According to the proposed LVEF cut-offs, 3816 patients were included in the preserved LVEF group (LVEF ≥ 50%), 1793 in the mid-range reduced LVEF group (LVEF 40–49%) and 589 patients in the reduced LVEF group (LVEF < 40%). Patients in the reduced LVEF group were at increased risk for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality compared with both, preserved and mid-range LVEF throughout five years of follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio 2.39 (95% confidence interval 1.75–3.28, p < 0.001) and 1.68 (95% confidence interval 1.34–2.10, p < 0.001), respectively). The risk of cardiac death and the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke were higher for patients in the reduced LVEF group compared with the preserved and mid-range reduced LVEF groups, but also for the mid-range LVEF compared with preserved LVEF group (adjusted p < 0.05 for all comparisons) throughout five years. Irrespective of clinical presentation at baseline (stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome), patients with reduced or mid-range LVEF were at increased risk of all-cause mortality and cardiac death up to five years compared with the other group (adjusted p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion Patients with reduced LVEF <40% or mid-range LVEF 40–49% in the context of coronary artery disease undergoing clinically indicated percutaneous coronary intervention are at increased risk of all-cause mortality, cardiac death and the composite of cardiac death, stroke and myocardial infarction throughout five years of follow-up. The recently proposed LVEF cut-offs contribute to the differentiation and risk stratification of patients with ischaemic heart disease.

P1737Influence of peripheral arterial disease on prognosis in patients with left main coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Martinez Leon ◽  
A Adeba Garcia ◽  
D Garcia Iglesias ◽  
P Florez Llano ◽  
A Flores Fuentes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract Introduction Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main (LM) coronary artery disease is acquiring an important role in the last years as an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in selected patients. The objective of the study was to evaluate predictors of mortality in patients with LM coronary artery disease treated with PCI. Methods Prospective and observational study of consecutive patients referred to our centre for coronary angiography, with LM coronary artery disease, whom PCI was decided in a “Heart team” as a strategy for revascularization between July 2015 and December 2017. Baseline clinical, analytical and coronary angiography data were collected. Follow-up was conducted in person or by telephone for a minimum of one year. We analysed the predictive variables of mortality by means of an uni and multivariate logistic regression model. In addition, a survival analysis was performed. Results A total of 191 patients were recruited. The average age was 72 years (±11.4), 79% males. 42% had previous documented coronary artery disease. PCI was performed in the context of acute coronary syndrome in 81% of them. The mean follow-up period was 17.9 months (± 8.3). After multivariate analysis, the following variables remained as independent predictors of mortality: the hemodynamic situation of the patient, assessed by the Killip-Kimball scale (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.03–2.43; p=0.04) and the presence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.03–6.67; p=0.04) (table 1). The ROC curve of the multivariate model showed an AUC of 0.796 (figure 1A). In the survival analysis, patients with PAD had a significantly lower survival, with a median survival of 6 months, compared to 13.9 months in those without PAD, with p=0.008 (figure 1B). Uni and multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p Killip-Kimbal scale 1.94 (1.39–2.72) 0 1.58 (1.03–2.43) 0.04 LVEF 0.96 (0.93–0.99) 0.01 0.99 (0.95–1.03) 0.46 Mitral regurgitation 2.54 (1.12–5.63) 0.02 1.60 (0.55–4.56) 0.38 Number of affected vessels 1.96 (1.24–3.29) 0.01 1.78 (1.03–3.37) 0.05 PAD 2.54 (1.16–5.49) 0.02 2.61 (1.03–6.67) 0.,04 Figure 1 Conclusion Although PCI revascularization of LM coronary artery disease is an attractive alternative to CABG in selected patients, a word of caution should be raised in patients with PAD, as in the present study this variable was an important predictor of short-medium term mortality.

scholarly journals Identify Unsuitable Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Intermediate SYNTAX Scores Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Zhang ◽  
Yaguang Zheng ◽  
Xinbin Liu ◽  
Yutong Cheng ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Syntax Score ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Repeated Revascularization

Background: With the follow-up extending to 5 years, the outcomes of SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) trial were comparable between coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in left-main (LM) patients with intermediate SYNTAX scores of 23–32. A subdivision depending on SYNTAX score will help to identify unsuitable LM patients with intermediate SYNTAX scores to receive PCI treatment.Methods: Between January 2011 and June 2013, 104 patients with LM Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) undergoing PCI were selected retrospectively. We compared clinical outcomes in patients with SYNTAX score <27 and ≥27. The follow-up time was 25.23 ± 7.92 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare various outcomes between two groups.Results: Higher rates of repeated revascularization (18.2% versus 4.2%, P = .027) and major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (MACCE) (24.2% versus 7.0%, P = .014) were shown in patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 27. After multivariate adjustment, a significant higher risk of repeated revascularization (hazard ratio: 6.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.48 to 26.37, P = .013) and MACCE (hazard ratio: 4.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.41 to 14.35, P = .011) were also found in patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 27.Conclusions: Based on the higher rate of repeated revascularization and MACCE, patients with LM CAD and intermediate SYNTAX scores will need a subdivision to identity the one not benefit from PCI. CABG is still the standard treatment method for patients of LM CAD with a SYNTAX score of ≥ 27.

scholarly journals Mortality after drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (34) ◽  
pp. 3228-3235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousif Ahmad ◽  
James P Howard ◽  
Ahran D Arnold ◽  
Christopher M Cook ◽  
Megha Prasad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Left Main Coronary Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Aims  The optimal method of revascularization for patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is controversial. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) has traditionally been considered the gold standard therapy, and recent randomized trials comparing CABG with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) have reported conflicting outcomes. We, therefore, performed a systematic review and updated meta-analysis comparing CABG to PCI with DES for the treatment of LMCAD. Methods and results  We systematically identified all randomized trials comparing PCI with DES vs. CABG in patients with LMCAD. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and unplanned revascularization. All analyses were by intention-to-treat. There were five eligible trials in which 4612 patients were randomized. The weighted mean follow-up duration was 67.1 months. There were no significant differences between PCI and CABG for the risk of all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–1.32; P = 0.779] or cardiac death (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.79–1.34; P = 0.817). There were also no significant differences in the risk of stroke (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.35–1.50; P = 0.400) or MI (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.96–1.56; P = 0.110). Percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with an increased risk of unplanned revascularization (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.49–2.02; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion  The totality of randomized clinical trial evidence demonstrated similar long-term mortality after PCI with DES compared with CABG in patients with LMCAD. Nor were there significant differences in cardiac death, stroke, or MI between PCI and CABG. Unplanned revascularization procedures were less common after CABG compared with PCI. These findings may inform clinical decision-making between cardiologists, surgeons, and patients with LMCAD.

scholarly journals Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Chinese Single-Center Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Hongliang Rui ◽  
Zhuhui Huang ◽  
Xiaoyu Xu ◽  
Taoshuai Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Repeat Revascularization ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Objectives Aims to compare the contemporary and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Design Observational cohort study, single-center.Setting The largest cardiac surgery center in China.Participants 823 CAD patients with advanced CKD (eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73m2) were collected, including 247 patients who underwent CABG and 576 patients received PCI from January 2010 to February 2019. Main outcome measures The primary end point was all-cause death. The secondary end points included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and revascularization.Results Multivariable Cox regression models were used for risk-adjustment and propensity score matching (PSM) was also performed. After PSM, the 30-day mortality rate in the CABG group was higher than that in the PCI group but without statistically significant (6.6%vs2.4%, p=0.0640). During the first year, patients referred for CABG had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41–3.01] for mortality compared with PCI. At the end of the 5-year follow-up, CABG group had a HR of 0.58 (95%CI, 0.38-0.86) for repeat revascularization, a HR of 0.77 (95%CI, 0.52-1.14) for survival rate and a HR of 0.88(95%CI, 0.56-1.18) for MACCE as compared to PCI. Conclusions Our study suggests that among advanced CKD patients，CABG showed obviously lower risk for repeat revascularization and slightly better prognosis regarding to mortality and other adverse events compared with PCI during the long-term follow-up. At a mean pooled follow-up of one year, both mortality and MACCEs were comparable in both cohorts.

scholarly journals 1510 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Hennessy ◽  
J A Henry
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Left Main Coronary Artery ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Aim There is still no consensus whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is as safe and effective as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Recent updates from key clinical trials necessitated an updated examination of the literature on this topic. Method A systematic search was performed of the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception to December 20th, 2020. Selected studies were analysed using the random effects model. Outcomes measured included all-cause mortality, MACCE, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and revascularization. Follow up points were 30 days, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years. Results Six RCTs with a total population of 4700 were included in the analysis. For all-cause mortality PCI was non-inferior to CABG at all time points. MACCE favoured PCI at 30 days, and CABG at 5 years. No difference was seen at 1 year and 10 years. MI favoured CABG at 5 years follow up, with no difference seen at 30 days, 1 year or five years. For stroke, PCI was favourable to CABG at 30 days and 1 year, with no difference at 5 years and 10 years. Revascularisation favoured CABG at 1 year and 5 years, with no difference at other time-points. Conclusions PCI may be considered as an alternative to CABG for uncomplicated LMCA disease. More complex lesions may still benefit from CABG. CABG may be of benefit where future revascularisation would rather be avoided. Further clinical trials examining this research question are needed.

P4733Risk of myocardial infarction with coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fifteen randomised trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P H Lee ◽  
H B Park ◽  
J S Lee ◽  
S W Lee ◽  
C W Lee
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Left Main Disease ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more effective in the prevention of myocardial infarction (MI). MI has been evaluated only as a secondary endpoint without a focused systematic review in multiple meta-analyses. Purpose To compare the risk of MI at the latest follow-up available between CABG versus PCI with stents in patients with multivessel or left main coronary artery disease in a pairwise meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT). Methods We searched EMBASE, Cochrane, and Pubmed databases for articles comparing CABG versus PCI for the treatment of multivessel or left main disease. We utilised random-effects model to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Fifteen trials with a total of 13,592 patients treated with either CABG (n=6,596) or PCI (n=6,996) were eligible and included. A multivariable random-effects meta-regression model, including variables such as age, sex, diabetes mellitus, publication year, follow-up duration, type of stent used, and type of coronary artery disease, was used to explore the source of potential heterogeneity of the primary result. Results After a weighted follow-up of 4.3 years, patients treated with CABG had a significantly lower risk of MI than patients treated with PCI (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58–0.96, P=0.024, I2=66%). The lower risk of MI with CABG as compared to PCI was more evident during a longer duration of follow-up (≥3 years, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52–0.91, P=0.008; ≥5 years, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48–0.86, P=0.003) and in diabetic population (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44–0.70, P<0.001). There was a statistically meaningful trend toward fewer MIs with CABG with a similar magnitude of risk reduction across patients with left main disease (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.47–1.15) and multivessel disease (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.99). Moderate inter-study heterogeneity could not be explained by the clinical and trial-based variables tested in meta-regression, and is likely because of differences in definitions of MI, risk profile of enrolled patients, and procedural specifics. Forest plots Conclusions In patients undergoing revascularization for multivessel or left main disease, the risk of MI was lower with CABG compared to PCI. The quality assurance for MI definition and treatment-specific procedures should be emphasized for future RCTs.

scholarly journals Outcomes of DES in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease after Risk Stratification by the SYNTAX Score

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. CMC.S37239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Loutfi ◽  
Mohamed A. Sadaka ◽  
Mohamed Sobhy
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Syntax Score ◽  
Repeat Revascularization ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Artery Disease

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of adverse outcomes after coronary revascularization. Controversy persists regarding the optimal revascularization strategy for diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD). Aim The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of drug-eluting stent (DES) insertion in DM and non-DM patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) after risk stratification by the percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score. Methods and Results We performed multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for 601 lesions in 243 DM patients and 1,029 lesions in 401 non-DM patients. All included patients had MVD and one or more lesions of type B2/C. The two-year outcomes and event rates were estimated in the DM and non-DM patients using Kaplan–Meier analyses. The baseline SYNTAX score was ≤22 in 84.8% vs. 84%, P = 0.804, and 23-32 in 15.2% vs. 16%, P = 0.804, of the DM and non-DM patients, respectively. The number of diseased segments treated (2.57 ± 0.75 vs. 2.47 ± 0.72; P = 0.066) and stents implanted per patient (2.41 ± 0.63 vs. 2.32 ± 0.54; P = 0.134) were similar in both groups. After a mean follow-up of 642 ± 175 days, there were no differences in the major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; 26.7% vs. 20.9%; P = 0.091), composite end point of all-cause death/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke (12.3% vs. 9%; P = 0.172), individual MACCE components of death (3.7% vs. 3.2%; P = 0.754), MI (6.6% vs. 4%; P = 0.142), and absence of stroke in the DM and non-DM patients. An increased need for repeat revascularization was observed in DM patients (18.5% vs. 10.2%; P = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, DM was an independent predictor of repeat revascularization (hazard ratio: 1.818; 95% confidence interval: 1.162-2.843; P = 0.009). Conclusions DES implantation provides favorable early and mid-term results in both DM and non-DM patients undergoing PCI for complex lesions. After a mean follow-up of two years, DM and non-DM patients with complex CAD treated by PCI using new-generation DES showed no differences with regard to MACCE and other secondary end points. However, higher rates of ischemia-driven repeat revascularization were observed in DM patients.

Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease in chronic kidney disease patients: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Jhand ◽  
R Bansal ◽  
R Dhawan ◽  
J.D Abbott ◽  
T Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Repeat Revascularization ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Limited data exist on the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in this population. Methods Multiple electronic databases were queried for studies comparing CABG and PCI in CKD patients undergoing LMCAD (&gt;50% diameter stenosis) revascularization. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate of &lt;60 ml/min/1.73 m2. The primary outcome was long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and repeat revascularization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, MI, stroke and repeat revascularization. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effect model. Results Six studies (4 observational, 2 randomized controlled trials) met inclusion criteria with a total of 2051 patients (CABG: 977, PCI: 1074). Patients undergoing CABG had a higher incidence of multi-vessel disease (74.7% vs 65.7%, p=0.01). At a mean follow-up of 3.4±1.1 years, MACCE was significantly lower in the CABG group (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57–0.87; p=0.001) (Figure 1). The odds of MI or repeat revascularization were lower with CABG, whereas the odds of stroke were higher; no statistically-significant difference was seen in all-cause mortality. Conclusion This meta-analysis shows that CABG is associated with lower rates of MACCE and MI but with a higher rate of stroke compared to PCI in LMCAD patients with CKD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document