Abstract
BackgroundThe influence of additional surgery on the prognosis of early gastric cancer who underwent noncurative endoscopic resection was controversial. Different results were observed in different studies. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate whether additional surgery could produce survival benefits for these patients.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases for relevant articles published until 31 March 2021 to investigate the differences in long-term results between the additional surgery group and the observation group. ResultsSixteen studies including 3877 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results had shown that the surgery group were younger and more male, higher undifferentiated type, higher rate of SM2, lymphatic and vascular invasion, lower recurrence and metastasis than the observation group. Good survival benefits were observed in additional surgery group with obvious significant differences in the 5-year OS, 5-year DSS and 5-year DFS. Similar results were obtained in the subgroup analysis, such as elderly patients (aged ≥70 years) in 5-year OS. ConclusionThis meta-analysis illustrated that significant survival benefits, including 5-year OS, 5-year DSS and 5-year DFS, could be obtained with additional gastrectomy in patients with EGC after noncurative ER, and patients ≥70 years could also benefit from surgery.
Endoscopic resection versus surgery for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions: a meta-analysis
