scholarly journals Iliac Crest Bone Grafting for the Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients with Glenoid Bone Loss: a Systematic Review of Contemporary Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael-Alexander Malahias ◽  
Dimitrios Chytas ◽  
Vasileios Raoulis ◽  
Efstathios Chronopoulos ◽  
Emmanouil Brilakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Iliac Crest ◽  
Contemporary Literature ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Iliac Crest Bone Grafting

Reporting of glenoid bone loss measurement in clinical studies and the need for standardization

2022 ◽  
Vol 104-B (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
Simon Weil ◽  
Magnus Arnander ◽  
Yemi Pearse ◽  
Duncan Tennent
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity

Aims The amount of glenoid bone loss is an important factor in deciding between soft-tissue and bony reconstruction when managing anterior shoulder instability. Accurate and reproducible measurement of glenoid bone loss is therefore vital in evaluation of shoulder instability and recommending specific treatment. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the range methods and measurement techniques employed in clinical studies treating glenoid bone loss. Methods A systematic review of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was undertaken to cover a ten-year period from February 2011 to February 2021. We identified clinical studies that incorporated bone loss assessment in the methodology as part of the decision-making in the management of patients with anterior shoulder instability. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) were used. Results A total of 5,430 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 82 studies met the final inclusion criteria. A variety of imaging methods were used: three studies did not specify which modality was used, and a further 13 used CT or MRI interchangeably. There was considerable heterogeneity among the studies that specified the technique used to quantify glenoid bone loss. A large proportion of the studies did not specify the technique used. Conclusion This systematic review has identified significant heterogeneity in both the imaging modality and method used to measure glenoid bone loss. The recommendation is that as a minimum for publication, authors should be required to reference the specific measurement technique used. Without this simple standardization, it is impossible to determine whether any published paper should influence clinical practice or should be dismissed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):12–18.

Management of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Loss: A Systematic Review to Assess Critical Bone Loss Amounts

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2484-2493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Brandon C. Cabarcas ◽  
Grant H. Garcia ◽  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bone Block ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
The Mean

Background: There is increasing evidence to suggest that the amount of glenoid bone loss to indicate bone block procedures may be lower than previously thought, particularly in the presence of a Hill-Sachs defect. Purpose: To better establish treatment recommendations for anterior shoulder instability among patients with bipolar bone lesions. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed with PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Studies evaluating outcomes of operative management in anterior shoulder instability that also reported glenoid bone loss in the presence of Hill-Sachs defects were included. Recurrence rates, glenoid bone loss, and humeral bone loss were pooled and analyzed with forest plots stratified by surgical procedure. Methods of quantification were analyzed for each article qualitatively. Results: Thirteen articles were included in the final analysis, with a total of 778 patients. The mean ± SD age was 24.9 ± 8.6 years. The mean follow-up was 30.1 months (range, 11-240 months). Only 13 of 408 (3.2%) reviewed bipolar bone loss articles quantified humeral and/or glenoid bone loss. Latarjet procedures had the greatest glenoid bone loss (21.7%; 95% CI, 14.8%-28.6%), followed by Bankart repairs (13.1%; 95% CI, 9.0%-17.2%), and remplissage (11.7%; 95% CI, 5.5%-18.0%). Humeral bone loss was primarily reported as percentage bone loss (22.2%; 95% CI, 13.1%-31.3% in Bankart repairs and 31.7%; 95% CI, 21.6%-41.1% in Latarjet) or as volumetric defects (439.1 mm3; 95% CI, 336.3-541.9 mm3 in Bankart repairs and 366.0 mm3; 95% CI, 258.4-475.4 mm3 in remplissage). Recurrence rates were as follows: Bankart repairs, 19.5% (95% CI, 14.5%-25.8%); remplissage, 4.4% (95% CI, 1.3%-14.0%); and Latarjet, 8.7% (95% CI, 5.0%-14.7%). Bankart repairs were associated with significantly greater recurrence of instability in included articles ( P = .013). Conclusion: There exists a need for universal and consistent preoperative measurement of humeral-sided bone loss. The presence of concomitant Hill-Sachs defects with glenoid pathology should warrant more aggressive operative management through use of bone block procedures. Previously established values of critical glenoid bone loss are not equally relevant in the presence of bipolar bone loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document