scholarly journals The use of a pedicled buccal fat pad for reconstruction of posterior mandibular defects

Author(s):  
Hyen Woo Lee ◽  
Sung ok Hong ◽  
Heeyeon Bae ◽  
Youngjin Shin ◽  
Yu-jin Jee

Abstract Background The pedicled buccal fat pad has been used for a long time to reconstruct oral defects due to its ease of flap formation and few complications. Many cases related to reconstruction of defects in the maxilla, such as closing the oroantral fistula, have been reported, but cases related to the reconstruction of defects in the mandible are limited. Under adequate anterior traction, pedicled buccal fat pad can be a reliable and effective method for reconstruction of surgical defects in the posterior mandible. Case presentation This study describes two cases of reconstruction of surgical oral defects in the posterior mandible, all of which were covered by a pedicled buccal fat pad. The size of the flap was sufficient to perfectly close the defect without any tension. Photographic and radiologic imaging showed successful closure of the defects and no problems were noted in the treated area. Conclusion In conclusion, the pedicled buccal fat pad graft is a convenient and reliable method for the reconstruction of surgical defects on the posterior mandible.

Author(s):  
Jinyoung Park ◽  
Byung-do Chun ◽  
Uk-Kyu Kim ◽  
Na-Rae Choi ◽  
Hong-Seok Choi ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Maxillary bone grafts and implantations have increased over recent years despite a lack of maxillary bone quality and quantity. The number of patients referred for oroantral fistula (OAF) due to implant or bone graft failure has increased, and in patients with an oroantral fistula, the pedicled buccal fat pad is viewed as a robust, reliable option. This study was conducted to document the usefulness of buccal fat pad grafts for oroantral fistula closure. Materials and methods We retrospectively studied 25 patients with OAF treated with a buccal fat pad graft from 2015 to 2018. Sex, age, OAF location, cause, duration, presence of systemic disease, smoking, previous dental surgery, and side effects were investigated. Results A total of 25 patients were studied. Mean patient age was 54.8 years, and the male to female ratio was 19:6. Causes of oroantral fistula were cyst enucleation, tumor resection, implant removal, bone graft failure, and extraction. Excellent results were obtained in 23 (92%) of the 25 patients. In the other two patients that both smoked, a small fistula was observed during follow-up. No recurrence of oroantral fistula was observed after 2 months to 1 year of follow-up. Conclusions The incidence of oroantral fistula is increasing due to implant and bone graft failures. Oroantral fistula closure using a pedicled buccal fat pad was found to have a high success rate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Capalbo-Silva ◽  
Hiskell Francine Fernandes e Oliveira ◽  
Henrique Hadad ◽  
Bruno Coelho Mendes ◽  
Breno dos Reis Fernandes ◽  
...  

A comunicação bucosinusal trata-se da comunicação não natural da cavidade bucal com o seio maxilar, estando muitas vezes relacionada a extração dos dentes superiores posteriores. A literatura apresenta diversas opções de tratamento para esses casos, entre eles o fechamento com o retalho pediculado com o corpo adiposo bucal. O objetivo deste trabalho foi relatar um caso de fístula bucosinusal em paciente diabético, discutindo alternativas cirúrgicas correlacionadas com problema sistêmico do paciente e características locais do defeito. Paciente do sexo masculino, 55 anos de idade, com histórico de dez dias de exodontia do elemento 27, com queixa de passagem de ar ao meio bucal através do sítio cirúrgico. Com base nos exames, o diagnóstico definitivo foi de comunicação bucosinusal, sendo estipulado o tratamento cirúrgico para o fechamento da comunicação através de duas camadas com o corpo adiposo da bochecha seguido do retalho vestibular. No acompanhamento de 8 meses e meio o paciente não apresenta queixas e pode-se observar o fechamento completo da comunicação bucosinusal. O retalho pediculado do corpo adiposo bucal seguido do retalho vestibular mostrou-se efetivo no tratamento da fístula bucosinusal em paciente diabético controlado.Descritores: Fístula Bucoantral; Cirurgia Bucal; Diabetes Mellitus.ReferênciasLozano-Carrascal N, Salomó-Coll O, Gehrke SA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Hernández-Alfaro F, Gargallo-Albiol J. Radiological evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy: A cross-sectional study of 300 patients. Ann Anat. 2017;214:1-8.Jang JK, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Kim HC. Anatomical relationship of maxillary posterior teeth with the sinus floor and buccal cortex. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(8):617-25. Khandelwal P, Hajira N. Management of Oro-antral Communication and Fistula: Various Surgical Options. World J Plast Surg. 2017;6(1):3-8.Parvini P, Obreja K, Begic A, et al. Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula. Int J Implant Dent. 2019;5(1):13.Lin PT, Bukachevsky R, Blake M. Management of odontogenic sinusitis with persistent oro-antral fistula. Ear Nose Throat J. 1991;70(8):488-90.Al-Juboori MJ, Al-Attas MA, Magno Filho LC. Treatment of chronic oroantral fistula with platelet-rich fibrin clot and collagen membrane: a case report. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018; 10:245-49.Kiran Kumar Krishanappa S, Eachempati P, Kumbargere Nagraj S, Shetty NY, Moe S, Aggarwal H et al.  Interventions for treating oro-antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD011784. Darr A, Jolly K, Martin T, Monaghan A, Grime P, Isles M et al. Three-layered technique to repair an oroantral fistula using a posterior-pedicled inferior turbinate, buccal fat pad, and buccal mucosal advancement flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56(7):638-39.Parvini P, Obreja K, Sader R, Becker J, Schwarz F, Salti L. Surgical options in oroantral fistula management: a narrative review. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4(1):40. Lin PT, Bukachevsky R, Blake M. Management of odontogenic sinusitis with persistent oro-antral fistula. Ear Nose Throat J. 1991;70(8):488-90.Borgonovo AE, Berardinelli FV, Favale M, Maiorana C. Surgical options in oroantral fistula treatment. Open Dent J. 2012;6:94-8.Ribeiro FS, de Toledo CT, Aleixo MR, Durigan MC, Silva WC, Bueno SK et al. Treatment of Oroantral Communication Using the Lateral Palatal Sliding Flap Technique. Case Rep Med. 2015;2015:730623.Erdoğan O, Esen E, Ustün Y. Bony palatal necrosis in a diabetic patient secondary to palatal rotational flap. J Diabetes Complications. 2005;19(6):364-67.Tideman H, Bosanquet A, Scott J. Use of the buccal fat pad as a pedicled graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44(6):435-40.Yang S, Jee YJ, Ryu DM. Reconstruction of large oroantral defects using a pedicled buccal fat pad. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 40(1):7.Raldi FV, Sardinha SCS, Albergaria-Barbosa JR. Fechamento de comunicação bucossinusal usando enxerto pediculado com corpo adiposo bucal. BCI. 2000;7(25):60-3.Poeschl PW, Baumann A, Russmueller G, Poeschl E, Klug C, Ewers R. Closure of oroantral communications with Bichat's buccal fat pad. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(7):1460-66.Batra H, Jindal G, Kaur S. Evaluation of different treatment modalities for closure of oro-antral communications and formulation of a rational approach. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010;9(1):13-8. Weinstock RJ, Nikoyan L, Dym H. Composite three-layer closure of oral antral communication with 10 months follow-up-a case study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(2):266.e1-266.e2667.Candamourty R, Jain MK, Sankar K, Babu MR. Double-layered closure of oroantral fistula using buccal fat pad and buccal advancement flap. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2012;3(2):203-5.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Franklin Bouthenet ◽  
Samy Amroun ◽  
Narcisse Zwetyenga

Introduction: Chronic maxillary atelectasis refers to a persistent volume decrease of the maxillary sinus by inward bowing of its walls. When associated with hypoglobus or enophthalmos, some authors use the term “silent sinus syndrome”. We aimed to report a case of accidental diagnosis of chronic maxillary atelectasis while investigating and treating a recurrent oroantral fistula. Observation: CT imaging showed a large bone defect and stage II chronic maxillary atelectasis. Closure of the oroantral fistula was performed with a combined surgical approach: functional endoscopic surgery and buccal fat pad flap. The follow up at 2 months showed no signs of recurrent oroantral fistula. Commentaries: Chronic maxillary atelectasis is separated into three stages, membranous deformity (stage I), bony deformity (stage II), and clinical deformity (stage III). The term silent sinus syndrome should be abandoned for stage III chronic maxillary atelectasis to allow for better collaboration between medical practitioners. Recurrent oroantral fistulas should be treated with a combined approach including endoscopic antrostomy and local flap. Conclusion: The association of functional endoscopic surgery and buccal fat pad flap were the key to success in this case allowing for oroantral fistula closure and treatment of chronic maxillary atelectasis.


Author(s):  
Joo-Hyung Yoon ◽  
Young-Wook Park ◽  
Seong-Gon Kim

Abstract Background Pedicled buccal fat pad (PBFP) has been used for the reconstruction of small-sized maxillary defects but cannot be used without hard tissue support on the defect larger than 4 cm × 4 cm × 3 cm. Case presentation A 64-year-old man had a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the left maxilla. After removal of the posterior maxilla, a complex bone defect (size, 5 cm × 4 cm × 3 cm) was immediately reconstructed using PBFP combined with a titanium mesh. A pinpoint fistula was found in the left palatal region 1 month after the surgery and was treated with a palatal sliding flap. There were no further complications during the follow-up. Conclusion The present technique demonstrated that PBFP combined with a titanium mesh could be used for the reconstruction of complex maxillary defect (size, 5 cm × 4 cm × 3 cm) without additional bone graft.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 404
Author(s):  
Madan Mishra ◽  
Bharat Shukla ◽  
Gaurav Singh ◽  
Gourab Das ◽  
Abhishek Singh

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Ceyhun Aksakal ◽  
Serdar Akti ◽  
Betül Subaşi Aksakal

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Enrico Borgonovo ◽  
Frederick Valerio Berardinelli ◽  
Marco Favale ◽  
Carlo Maiorana

Oral fistula (OAF) is a pathological communication between the oral cavity and maxillary sinus which has its origin either from iatrogenic complications or from dental infections, osteomyelitis, radiation therapy or trauma. OAF closures can be achieved using different flaps which show both advantages and limitations. Therefore they all need careful consideration in order to select the best approach depending on the situation. The most widely employed flaps are of three types: vestibular flap, palatal flap and buccal fat pad Flap(BFP). The authors present three cases of OAF with the different techniques. It is suggested that the buccal flap is best applied in the case of large fistulas located in the anterior region, the palatal flap is suitable to correct premolar defects and the BFP flap for wide posterior OAFs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiv Prasad Sharma

Various techniques have been used for the repair of oroantral fistula (OAF) but majority of them have focused on the soft tissue closure alone, and most of the time, the osseous floor of the sinus was ignored. Existing literature supports that bone grafts supported by Buccal Fat Pad (BFP) heal well without undergoing significant resorption and necrosis. Through this case report, we wish to elaborate on the clinical success of using BFP and autogenous chin graft for simultaneous reconstruction of a large long-standing oroantral fistula with underlying osseous defect. The combination technique can prove beneficial for osseous regeneration of sinus floor and improve chances for future implant prosthetic rehabilitation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document