Can we quantitatively image complex structures with rays?

Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1223-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stéphane Operto ◽  
Sheng Xu ◽  
Gilles Lambaré

Ray‐based prestack depth migration fails to image quantitatively complex structures when a single arrival—for example, the first or the strongest one—is taken into account. In this paper, we investigate whether accounting for multiple arrivals in ray‐based preserved amplitude prestack depth migration allows one to improve quantitative imaging of complex media. The asymptotic ray‐Born migration/inversion, originally designed to process one single arrival, is extended to the case of multiple arrivals by accounting for the cross‐contributions of all the source and receiver raypaths. Multiple arrivals in the folded ray fields are computed by a dynamic ray tracing based on a wavefront construction technique. With an application to the complex Marmousi model, we demonstrate that ray‐Born inversion can provide a reliable quantitative estimation of the relative impedance perturbation even in the complex deep part of the model, for which the amplitudes were underestimated drastically when only a single arrival was used, either the first or the strongest one. This 2-D case study shows that complex structures can be imaged quantitatively with rays. Future studies will require the optimizing of the implementation of ray‐Born migration/inversion with multiple arrivals before considering 3-D applications.

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 246-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oong K. Youn ◽  
Hua‐wei Zhou

Depth imaging with multiples is a prestack depth migration method that uses multiples as the signal for more accurate boundary mapping and amplitude recovery. The idea is partially related to model‐based multiple‐suppression techniques and reverse‐time depth migration. Conventional reverse‐time migration uses the two‐way wave equation for the backward wave propagation of recorded seismic traces and ray tracing or the eikonal equation for the forward traveltime computation (the excitation‐time imaging principle). Consequently, reverse‐time migration differs little from most other one‐way wave equation or ray‐tracing migration methods which expect only primary reflection events. Because it is almost impossible to attenuate multiples without degrading primaries, there has been a compelling need to devise a tool to use multiples constructively in data processing rather than attempting to destroy them. Furthermore, multiples and other nonreflecting wave types can enhance boundary imaging and amplitude recovery if a full two‐way wave equation is used for migration. The new approach solves the two‐way wave equation for both forward and backward directions of wave propagation using a finite‐difference technique. Thus, it handles all types of acoustic waves such as reflection (primary and multiples), refraction, diffraction, transmission, and any combination of these waves. During the imaging process, all these different types of wavefields collapse at the boundaries where they are generated or altered. The process goes through four main steps. First, a source function (wavelet) marches forward using the full two‐way scalar wave equation from a source location toward all directions. Second, the recorded traces in a shot gather march backward using the full two‐way scalar wave equation from all receiver points in the gather toward all directions. Third, the two forward‐ and backward‐propagated wavefields are correlated and summed for all time indices. And fourth, a Laplacian image reconstruction operator is applied to the correlated image frame. This technique can be applied to all types of seismic data: surface seismic, vertical seismic profile (VSP), crosswell seismic, vertical cable seismic, ocean‐bottom cable (OBC) seismic, etc. Because it migrates all wave types, the input data require no or minimal preprocessing (demultiple should not be done, but near‐surface or acquisition‐related problems might need to be corrected). Hence, it is only a one‐step process from the raw field gathers to a final depth image. External noise in the raw data will not correlate with the forward wavefield except for some coincidental matching; therefore, it is usually unnecessary to do signal enhancement processing before the depth imaging with multiples. The input velocity model could be acquired from various methods such as iterative focusing analysis or tomography, as in other prestack depth migration methods. The new method has been applied to data sets from a simple multiple‐generating model, the Marmousi model, and a real offset VSP. The results show accurate imaging of primaries and multiples with overall significant improvements over conventionally imaged sections.


2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 528-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Hawkins ◽  
Richard Leggott ◽  
Gareth Williams ◽  
Herman Kat

Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 508-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Chavent ◽  
René‐Edouard Plessix

In order to define an optimal true‐amplitude prestack depth migration for multishot and multitrace data, we develop a general methodology based on the least‐squares data misfit function associated with a forward model. The amplitude of the migrated events are restored at best for any given geometry and any given preliminary filtering and amplitude correction of the data. The migrated section is then the gradient of the cost function multiplied by a weight matrix. A study of the Hessian associated with this data misfit shows how efficiently to find a good weight matrix via the computation of only few elements of this Hessian. Thanks to this matrix, the resulting migration operator is optimal in the sense that it ensures the best possible restoration of the amplitudes among the large class of least‐squares migrations. Applied to a forward model based on Born, ray tracing, and diffracting points approximation, this optimal migration outperforms or at least equals the classic Kirchhoff formula, since the latter belongs to the class of least‐squares migrations and is only optimal for one shot and an infinite aperture. Numerical results illustrate this construction and confirm the above expectations.


2001 ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
Philippe Berthet ◽  
Paul Williamson ◽  
Paul Sexton ◽  
Joachim Mispel

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asdrúbal Bernal ◽  
Enrique Novoa ◽  
Andrés Pilloud ◽  
Omar Uzcátegui

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document