scholarly journals Seismic velocity estimation: A deep recurrent neural-network approach

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. U21-U29
Author(s):  
Gabriel Fabien-Ouellet ◽  
Rahul Sarkar
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Recurrent Neural Networks ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Interval Velocity ◽  
Velocity Model Building ◽  
3D Velocity Model

Applying deep learning to 3D velocity model building remains a challenge due to the sheer volume of data required to train large-scale artificial neural networks. Moreover, little is known about what types of network architectures are appropriate for such a complex task. To ease the development of a deep-learning approach for seismic velocity estimation, we have evaluated a simplified surrogate problem — the estimation of the root-mean-square (rms) and interval velocity in time from common-midpoint gathers — for 1D layered velocity models. We have developed a deep neural network, whose design was inspired by the information flow found in semblance analysis. The network replaces semblance estimation by a representation built with a deep convolutional neural network, and then it performs velocity estimation automatically with recurrent neural networks. The network is trained with synthetic data to identify primary reflection events, rms velocity, and interval velocity. For a synthetic test set containing 1D layered models, we find that rms and interval velocity are accurately estimated, with an error of less than [Formula: see text] for the rms velocity. We apply the neural network to a real 2D marine survey and obtain accurate rms velocity predictions leading to a coherent stacked section, in addition to an estimation of the interval velocity that reproduces the main structures in the stacked section. Our results provide strong evidence that neural networks can estimate velocity from seismic data and that good performance can be achieved on real data even if the training is based on synthetics. The findings for the 1D problem suggest that deep convolutional encoders and recurrent neural networks are promising components of more complex networks that can perform 2D and 3D velocity model building.

Time-to-depth conversion and velocity estimation by image-wavefront propagation

Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. U75-U85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro da S. Sadala Valente ◽  
Henrique B. Santos ◽  
Jessé C. Costa ◽  
Jörg Schleicher
Keyword(s):  
Ray Tracing ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Time Step ◽  
Velocity Anomaly ◽  
Interval Velocity ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Wavefront Propagation ◽  
Velocity Model Building

A new strategy for time-to-depth conversion and interval-velocity estimation is based entirely on image-wavefront propagation without the need to follow individual image rays. The procedure has three main features: (1) It computes the velocity field and the traveltime directly, allowing us to dispense with dynamic ray tracing; (2) it requires only the knowledge of the image wavefront at the previous time step; and (3) it inherently smooths the image wavefront, inhibiting the formation of caustics. As a consequence, the method tends to be faster than the usual techniques and does not carry the constraints and limitations inherent to common ray-tracing strategies. Synthetic tests using a Gaussian velocity anomaly as well as the Marmousi velocity model, and two smoothed versions of it show the feasibility of the method. A field-data example demonstrates the use of different numerical procedures. Our results indicate that the present strategy can be used to construct reasonable depth-velocity models that can be used as reliable starting models for velocity-model building in depth migration or for tomographic methods.

Seismic Velocity Model Building Using Neural Networks: Training Data Design and Learning Generalization

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-73
Author(s):  
Hani Alzahrani ◽  
Jeffrey Shragge
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Training Process ◽  
Training Models ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Velocity Model Building ◽  
Layer Velocity

Data-driven artificial neural networks (ANNs) offer a number of advantages over conventional deterministic methods in a wide range of geophysical problems. For seismic velocity model building, judiciously trained ANNs offer the possibility of estimating high-resolution subsurface velocity models. However, a significant challenge of ANNs is training generalization, which is the ability of an ANN to apply the learning from the training process to test data not previously encountered. In the context of velocity model building, this means learning the relationship between velocity models and the corresponding seismic data from a set of training data, and then using acquired seismic data to accurately estimate unknown velocity models. We ask the following question: what type of velocity model structures need be included in the training process so that the trained ANN can invert seismic data from a different (hypothetical) geological setting? To address this question, we create four sets of training models: geologically inspired and purely geometrical, both with and without background velocity gradients. We find that using geologically inspired training data produce models with well-delineated layer interfaces and fewer intra-layer velocity variations. The absence of a certain geological structure in training models, though, hinders the ANN's ability to recover it in the testing data. We use purely geometric training models consisting of square blocks of varying size to demonstrate the ability of ANNs to recover reasonable approximations of flat, dipping, and curved interfaces. However, the predicted models suffer from intra-layer velocity variations and non-physical artifacts. Overall, the results successfully demonstrate the use of ANNs in recovering accurate velocity model estimates, and highlight the possibility of using such an approach for the generalized seismic velocity inversion problem.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document