A lateral well in the Shublik Formation, Alaska North Slope, with implications for unconventional resource potential

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. SJ35-SJ49
Author(s):  
Allegra Hosford Scheirer ◽  
Kenneth J. Bird

Analyses of a horizontal well drilled in the Shublik Formation within the southern part of the Prudhoe Bay field provide the first glimpse of the unit’s potential as an unconventional resource. Drilled in 1996, the 1450 ft (442 m) long well, PBU X-19B L1, targeted the 17 ft (5 m) thick Shublik Zone B. More than 70% of the lateral well path sampled that target, a feat of precise geosteering years before the unconventional revolution. The well operator’s drilling plan focused on the middle subzone of Zone B. The well history ascribes the focus on the middle subzone to its high silt content, open fractures, and significant hydrocarbon shows. Contrary to the drilling narrative, cuttings from 41 intervals indicate that siltstone monotonically decreases in Shublik Zone B, on average, from 50% to 40% to 30% in the three subzones from top to base. The limestone concentration inversely varies with the siltstone concentration through Zone B, steadily increasing from top to base (40%, 50%, and 60%). Hydrocarbon shows in the upper and middle subzones of Zone B range from good to fair, whereas the shows in the lower Zone B are weaker. Unfortunately, scant geochemical analyses of oil produced from the Shublik flow test combined with engineering difficulties prevent a definitive conclusion as to the source of the oil — the fractured Shublik Formation or the underlying Ivishak Sandstone. However, on the basis of favorable lithology, hydrocarbon shows, and fracture density, the upper and middle subzones of Zone B should be targeted as a potential unconventional accumulation if and when a well is drilled in the pod of active source rock downdip.

Elements ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. T. Bryndzia ◽  
N. R. Braunsdorf

1999 ◽  
Vol 1999 (1) ◽  
pp. 1269-1272
Author(s):  
Ian Buist ◽  
James McCourt ◽  
Joseph V. Mullin ◽  
Nick W. Glover ◽  
Charlene Hutton ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT A series of research burns was carried out in the fall of 1997 in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, in a new wave tank purpose-built for oil spill research and training. These tests were the culmination of a 3-year research project by Alaska Clean Seas (ACS) and S.L. Ross into the effects of oil type, emulsification, temperature and waves on in situ burning in Arctic open water conditions. The 1997 experimental program involved conducting mid-scale burns with fresh and weathered Alaska North Slope (ANS) and Milne Pt. crude oils and emulsion slicks in waves, including tests involving the addition of emulsion breakers. Emulsion breakers are surface active chemicals which are added at very low dosages (1:500 to 1:5000) to petroleum emulsions to promote separation of the emulsion into discrete oil and water phases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document