Diffraction Imaging with Geometric-mean Reverse Time Migration

Author(s):  
Jianhang Yin ◽  
Norimitsu Nakata
Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. S355-S364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhang Yin ◽  
Nori Nakata

Diffracted waves contain a great deal of valuable information about small-scale subsurface structure such as faults, pinch-outs, karsts, and fractures, which are closely related to hydrocarbon accumulation and production. Therefore, diffraction separation and imaging with high spatial resolution play an increasingly critical role in seismic exploration. We have applied the geometric-mean reverse time migration (GmRTM) method to diffracted waves for imaging only subsurface diffractors based on the difference of the wave phenomena between diffracted and reflected waves. Numerical tests prove the advantages of this method on diffraction imaging with higher resolution as well as fewer artifacts compared to conventional RTM even when we only have a small number of receivers. Then, we developed a workflow to extract diffraction information using a fully data-driven method, called common-reflection surface (CRS), before we applied GmRTM. Application of this workflow indicates that GmRTM further improves the quality of the image by combining with the diffraction-separation technique CRS in the data domain.


Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. S185-S198
Author(s):  
Chuang Li ◽  
Jinghuai Gao ◽  
Zhaoqi Gao ◽  
Rongrong Wang ◽  
Tao Yang

Diffraction imaging is important for high-resolution characterization of small subsurface heterogeneities. However, due to geometry limitations and noise distortion, conventional diffraction imaging methods may produce low-quality images. We have adopted a periodic plane-wave least-squares reverse time migration method for diffractions to improve the image quality of heterogeneities. The method reformulates diffraction imaging as an inverse problem using the Born modeling operator and its adjoint operator derived in the periodic plane-wave domain. The inverse problem is implemented for diffractions separated by a plane-wave destruction filter from the periodic plane-wave sections. Because the plane-wave destruction filter may fail to eliminate hyperbolic reflections and noise, we adopt a hyperbolic misfit function to minimize a weighted residual using an iteratively reweighted least-squares algorithm and thereby reduce residual reflections and noise. Synthetic and field data tests show that the adopted method can significantly improve the image quality of subsalt and deep heterogeneities. Compared with reverse time migration, it produces better images with fewer artifacts, higher resolution, and more balanced amplitude. Therefore, the adopted method can accurately characterize small heterogeneities and provide a reliable input for seismic interpretation in the prediction of hydrocarbon reservoirs.


Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. KS51-KS60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nori Nakata ◽  
Gregory C. Beroza

Time reversal is a powerful tool used to image directly the location and mechanism of passive seismic sources. This technique assumes seismic velocities in the medium and propagates time-reversed observations of ground motion at each receiver location. Assuming an accurate velocity model and adequate array aperture, the waves will focus at the source location. Because we do not know the location and the origin time a priori, we need to scan the entire 4D image (3D in space and 1D in time) to localize the source, which makes time-reversal imaging computationally demanding. We have developed a new approach of time-reversal imaging that reduces the computational cost and the scanning dimensions from 4D to 3D (no time) and increases the spatial resolution of the source image. We first individually extrapolate wavefields at each receiver, and then we crosscorrelate these wavefields (the product in the frequency domain: geometric mean). This crosscorrelation creates another imaging condition, and focusing of the seismic wavefields occurs at the zero time lag of the correlation provided the velocity model is sufficiently accurate. Due to the analogy to the active-shot reverse time migration (RTM), we refer to this technique as the geometric-mean RTM or GmRTM. In addition to reducing the dimension from 4D to 3D compared with conventional time-reversal imaging, the crosscorrelation effectively suppresses the side lobes and yields a spatially high-resolution image of seismic sources. The GmRTM is robust for random and coherent noise because crosscorrelation enhances signal and suppresses noise. An added benefit is that, in contrast to conventional time-reversal imaging, GmRTM has the potential to be used to retrieve velocity information by analyzing time and/or space lags of crosscorrelation, which is similar to what is done in active-source imaging.


Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-52
Author(s):  
Tong Bai ◽  
Bin Lyu ◽  
Paul Williamson ◽  
Nori Nakata

Geometric-mean Reverse-time migration (GmRTM), a powerful cross-correlation-based imaging method, generates higher-resolution source images and is more robust to noise compared to conventional time-reversal imaging. The price to pay is the higher computational costs. Alternatively, we can adopt hybrid strategies by dividing the receivers into different groups. Conventional time reversal (i.e., wavefield summation) is performed inside each group, followed by the application of cross-correlation imaging condition among different groups. Such hybrid strategies can retain the advantages of both GmRTM and time-reversal, and are often more practical than pure GmRTM. Yet, designing appropriate grouping strategy is not trivial. Here, we propose two grouping strategies (adjacent and scattered) and use synthetic and field-data examples to evaluate their performance with various group numbers. In addition to the spatial resolution of the source image, robustness to random noise is another important assessment criterion, for which we consider two distribution patterns, such as concentrated and scattered, of traces contaminated with strong random noise. We also evaluated their effectiveness to visualize events (in the image domain) that are not completely recorded by all receivers. Our comprehensive tests illustrate the respective advantages of the two grouping strategies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Silvestrov ◽  
Reda Baina ◽  
Evgeny Landa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document