Rock physics study: Facies modeling of glacial channels

Author(s):  
Ahmed Al-Dawood ◽  
Salma Alsinan
Keyword(s):  
Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. B219-B230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinaldo J. Michelena ◽  
Kevin S. Godbey ◽  
Omar G. Angola

Modeling of rock types or facies in unconventional reservoirs presents numerous challenges that are not encountered in conventional reservoirs. Because the exploitation of unconventional reservoirs frequently relies on the use of large numbers of long, data-poor horizontal wells, routine tasks in conventional reservoirs, such as petrophysical analyses and rock-physics diagnostics, become problematic in unconventional reservoirs due to insufficient data. Similarly, the inability to generate synthetic seismograms in the horizontal section of the wells makes seismic well ties and time-depth conversions more difficult. Our approach for facies modeling in unconventional reservoirs attempts to overcome these challenges by using the abundant log information available along the vertical pilot well to extract discrete facies indicators (facies flags) from logging-while-drilling information along the horizontals. After performing a time-depth conversion constrained by geosteering information, we estimate facies probabilities using facies flags and prestack elastic inversion results also extracted along the horizontals. As opposed to the Bayesian formalism commonly used for facies probabilities estimation, our frequentist approach estimates probabilities directly from proportions derived from crossplots of inverted elastic properties without using the Bayes formula. No prior information is required. The margin of error in the probabilities is also estimated by applying a well-known formula used to estimate the margin of error in opinion polls. Finally, we use seismic probability results to select only points with high probability and high reliability, which are treated as hard constraints for stochastic facies modeling. The selection of the seismic constraints is also weighted by the vertical facies trend expected for the area of interest. Our final facies model closely follows horizontal and vertical well facies data, vertical proportion curves, and selected seismic constraints. The application of the methodology is illustrated in a carbonate-rich, unconventional reservoir in South Texas.


Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. M17-M28
Author(s):  
Wei Xie ◽  
Kyle T. Spikes

We have developed a technique to design and optimize reservoir lithofluid facies based on probabilistic rock-physics templates. Subjectivity is promoted to design possible facies scenarios with different pore-fluid conditions, and quantitative simulations and evaluations are conducted in facies model selection. This method aims to provide guidelines for reservoir-facies modeling in an exploration setting in which limited data exist. The work includes two parts: facies-model simulations and uncertainty evaluations. We have first derived scenarios with all possible fluid types using Gassmann fluid substitution. We designed models with different numbers of facies and pore-fluid conditions using site-specific rock-physics templates. Detailed facies simulations were conducted in the petroelastic, elastic, and seismic domains in a step-by-step framework to preserve the geologic interpretability. The use of probabilistic rock-physics templates allowed for multiple realizations of each facies model to account for different types and magnitudes of errors and to infer facies probability and uncertainty. For each realization, we used Bayesian classification to assign facies labels. Comparisons between the predicted and true labels provided the success rates and entropy indices to quantify the prediction errors and confidence degrees, respectively. This workflow was tested with well-log data from a clastic reservoir in the Gulf of Mexico. We simulated models with five to seven facies with different pore-fluid parameters. From the petroelastic, elastic, and seismic domains, the uncertainty of facies models significantly increased due to well-log measurement errors, data-model mismatch, and resolution differences. The facies model consisting of oil sand, gas sand, and shale was the optimal set based on the high success rates and low entropy indices. Facies profiles estimated from this optimal model presented significant consistency with well-log interpretations. The techniques and results demonstrated here could be applied to different types of clastic reservoirs, and they provide useful constraints for reservoir facies modeling during early oilfield exploration stages.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Teixeira ◽  
Fernanda Gobatto ◽  
Alexandre Maul ◽  
Nathalia Martinho Cruz ◽  
João Laquini ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Soroka ◽  
Taha Al-Dayyani ◽  
Christian J. Strohmenger ◽  
Hafez H. Hafez ◽  
Mahfoud Salah Al-Jenaibi

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiyu Xu ◽  
Ganglin Chen ◽  
Yaping Zhu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Michael Payne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document