scholarly journals Medically unexplained symptoms in primary care

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 432-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Else Guthrie

Adult patients with medically unexplained symptoms (somatisation) in primary care are numerous and make disproportionately high demands on health services. Most of these individuals are open to the suggestion that their illness reflects psychological needs. Empowering explanations from doctors can enable patient and doctor to work collaboratively in managing the problem and can reduce healthcare contacts. Parental medically unexplained symptoms, sexual and physical abuse in childhood and childhood neglect are associated with a greater risk of medically unexplained symptoms in adulthood. The overall prognosis for the majority of primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms is very good. The two most common approaches to dealing with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care are stepped-care approaches and teaching general practitioners new skills to manage consultations more effectively.

2005 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Smith ◽  
Joseph C. Gardiner ◽  
Judith S. Lyles ◽  
Corina Sirbu ◽  
Francesca C. Dwamena ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Kellett ◽  
Kimberley Webb ◽  
Nic Wilkinson ◽  
Paul Bliss ◽  
Tom Ayers ◽  
...  

Background: There are national policy drivers for mental health services to demonstrate that they are effectively meeting the psychological needs of people with long-term health conditions/medically unexplained symptoms (LTC/MUS). Aims: To evaluate the implementation of a stepped-care service delivery model within an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service for patients with depression or anxiety in the context of their LTC/MUS. Method: A stepped-care model was designed and implemented. Clinical and organizational impacts were evaluated via analyses of LTC/MUS patient profiles, throughputs and outcomes. Results: The IAPT service treated N = 844 LTC and N = 172 MUS patients, with the majority (81.81%) receiving a low intensity intervention. Dropout across the service steps was low. There were few differences between LTC and MUS outcome rates regardless of step of service, but outcomes were suppressed when compared to generic IAPT patients. Conclusions: The potential contribution of IAPT stepped-care service delivery models in meeting the psychological needs of LTC/MUS patients is debated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document