Experience with cetuximab plus paclitaxel/carboplatinum in primary platinum-resistant recurrent head and neck cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6077-6077 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Buentzel ◽  
A. de Vries ◽  
O. Micke

6077 Background: In patients with platinum-resistant recurrent head and neck cancer the Anti-EGF-receptor antibody cetuximab could be used as a treatment option. Little is known about results of this therapeutic option. The objective of this study was to evaluate therapeutic benefit of this indication. Methods: 23 patients with histological confirmed recurrent head and neck cancer (18 male, 3 female, median age was 57 years) were included in this exploratory study. All recurrences had occurred after chemotherapy with platinum- derivates. 19 patients received radiation therapy during primary treatment. No surgical or radiotherapeutic option in recurrent disease was possible. Two patients were diagnosed with lung metastasis. The 2nd-line therapy consisted of carboplatinum (200 mg/m2) + paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) every three weeks (week 1, 4, and 7) and additionally cetuximab, which was given with 400 mg/m2 as loading dose in week 1 and 250 mg/m2 in week 2–6. Results: A significant tumor response was observed in 13/23 patients (56%). 7 partial, 5 minor and one complete remission were registered. The median survival time was 8 month (range 3–10), 4 patients are still alive. Median time to progression was 5 month (range 2–8). Side effects were rash (16/22), fever (9/22) and typical chemotherapy induced toxicities as neuropathy (7/22) and cytopenia (4/22). All side effects were moderate and easy to handle. Conclusions: The described combined chemoimmuntherapy with cetuximab and paclitaxel + carboplatinum seems to offer new strategies in 2nd and 3rd line chemotherapy for patients with platinum-resistant head and neck cancer, potentially overcoming primary platinum resistance. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2011 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. S26
Author(s):  
B. Tschechne ◽  
J. Borghardt ◽  
I. Wildfang ◽  
D. Schroder ◽  
H. Niebuhr ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1910
Author(s):  
Kaley Woods ◽  
Robert K. Chin ◽  
Kiri A. Cook ◽  
Ke Sheng ◽  
Amar U. Kishan ◽  
...  

This study evaluates the potential for tumor dose escalation in recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients with automated non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning (HyperArc). Twenty rHNC patients are planned with conventional VMAT SBRT to 40 Gy while minimizing organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. They are then re-planned with the HyperArc technique to match these minimal OAR doses while escalating the target dose as high as possible. Then, we compare the dosimetry, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the two plan types. Our results show that the HyperArc technique significantly increases the mean planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) doses by 10.8 ± 4.4 Gy (25%) and 11.5 ± 5.1 Gy (26%) on average, respectively. There are no clinically significant differences in OAR doses, with maximum dose differences of <2 Gy on average. The average TCP is 23% (± 21%) higher for HyperArc than conventional plans, with no significant differences in NTCP for the brainstem, cord, mandible, or larynx. HyperArc can achieve significant tumor dose escalation while maintaining minimal OAR doses in the head and neck—potentially enabling improved local control for rHNC SBRT patients without increased risk of treatment-related toxicities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S855
Author(s):  
J. von der Grün ◽  
A. Altay-Langguth ◽  
P. Balermpas ◽  
C. Brandts ◽  
S. Balster ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (10) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A K Abdel Razek

AbstractObjectiveTo assess arterial spin labelling and diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of recurrent head and neck cancer from post-radiation changes.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted of 47 patients with head and neck cancer, treated with radiotherapy, who underwent magnetic resonance arterial spin labelling and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Tumour blood flow and apparent diffusion co-efficient of the lesion were calculated.ResultsThere was significant difference (p= 0.001) in tumour blood flow between patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (n= 31) (47.37 ± 16.3 ml/100 g/minute) and those with post-radiation changes (n= 16) (18.80 ± 2.9 ml/100 g/minute). The thresholds of tumour blood flow and apparent diffusion co-efficient used for differentiating recurrence from post-radiation changes were more than 24.0 ml/100 g/minute and 1.21 × 10−3mm2/second or less, with area under the curve values of 0.94 and 0.90, and accuracy rates of 88.2 per cent and 88.2 per cent, respectively. The combined tumour blood flow and apparent diffusion co-efficient values used for differentiating recurrence from post-radiation changes had an area under the curve of 0.96 and an accuracy of 90.2 per cent.ConclusionCombined tumour blood flow and apparent diffusion co-efficient can differentiate recurrence from post-radiation changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document