scholarly journals Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Administered at a Fixed Dose Rate or in Combination With Cisplatin, Docetaxel, or Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: CALGB 89904

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (33) ◽  
pp. 5506-5512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew H. Kulke ◽  
Margaret A. Tempero ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
Donna R. Hollis ◽  
Hedy L. Kindler ◽  
...  

PurposeThe relative value of gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy therapy and prolonged infusions of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer remains controversial. We explored the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate or in combination with cisplatin, docetaxel, or irinotecan in a multi-institutional, randomized, phase II study.Patients and MethodsPatients with metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to one of the following four regimens: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2on days 1, 8, and 15 with cisplatin 50 mg/m2on days 1 and 15 (arm A); gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2at a rate of 10 mg/m2/min on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm B); gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2with docetaxel 40 mg/m2on days 1 and 8 (arm C); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2with irinotecan 100 mg/m2on days 1 and 8 (arm D). Patients were observed for response, toxicity, and survival.ResultsTwo hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled onto the study, of whom 245 were eligible and received treatment. Anticipated rates of myelosuppression, fatigue, and expected regimen-specific toxicities were observed. The overall tumor response rates were 12% to 14%, and the median overall survival times were 6.4 to 7.1 months among the four regimens.ConclusionGemcitabine/cisplatin, fixed dose rate gemcitabine, gemcitabine/docetaxel, and gemcitabine/irinotecan have similar antitumor activity in metastatic pancreatic cancer. In light of recent negative randomized studies directly comparing several of these regimens with standard gemcitabine, none of these approaches can be recommended for routine use in patients with this disease.

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4120-4120
Author(s):  
B. Kobrossy ◽  
B. F. El-Rayes ◽  
A. F. Shields ◽  
U. Vaishampayan ◽  
L. Heilbrun ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4120-4120
Author(s):  
B. Kobrossy ◽  
B. F. El-Rayes ◽  
A. F. Shields ◽  
U. Vaishampayan ◽  
L. Heilbrun ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15530-e15530
Author(s):  
G. Tonini ◽  
B. Vincenzi ◽  
E. Vasile ◽  
V. Catalano ◽  
V. Virzì ◽  
...  

e15530 Background: The aims of this phase II trial are to determine the activity and the safety of the new combination modality with Gemcitabine fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion and Capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who had pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG PS < 2 and measurable disease were enrolled. Gemcitabine (800 mg/mq IV infused in 80 minutes on days 1 and 8) and Capecitabine (650 mg/mq orally twice daily for 14 days) were administered and repeated every 21 days. Results: 47 patients were enrolled between January 2004 and October 2008. Median age was 66 (range: 37–79), 18 female and 29 male. A total of 299 cycles were administered, median cycles for patient were 6 (range: 1–17). CR was observed in one patient (2.1 %) and 10 patients achieved PR (21.3 %) giving an overall response rate of 23.4 % in intention-to-treat population. 22 pts (46.8 %) had stable disease obtaining an overall tumour control of 70.2 %. The median time to progression was 5.2 months (95 % CI, 2.4–7.6); the median overall survival was 8.4 months (95 % CI, 5.5–20). Grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 29.8 % of subjects, thrombocytopenia in 6.4 %. Grade 1–2 non-hematological toxicities were asthenia (61.7 %), diarrhea (29.8%), stomatitis (29.8 %) and hand foot syndrome (2.1 %). There were no treatment-related deaths. Gemcitabine was skipped at least once/reduced in 51/10.6 % of the patients, respectively. Capecitabine was skipped at least once/reduced in 16/8 % of the patients, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of FDR Gemcitabine and Capecitabine with this modality of infusion is feaseble, safe and seems to be active. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15596-15596 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Santini ◽  
B. Vincenzi ◽  
G. Masi ◽  
V. Catalano ◽  
V. Virzi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document