Return to primary service among bone marrow transplant rehabilitation inpatients: An index for predicting outcomes.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19509-e19509
Author(s):  
Jack Brian Fu ◽  
Jay Ted Lee ◽  
Dennis Wesley Smith

e19509 Background: Inpatient rehabilitation bone marrow transplant patients can be challenging due to their medical fragility. Methods: One hundred forty-seven bone marrow transplant patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation at a major national cancer hospital between January 1, 2002, and April 15, 2009, regardless of the patient’s primary cancer were retrospectively studied. Return to primary service and factors including age, gender, race, presence of graft-versus-host disease, type of hematopoietic stem cell transplant, type of primary cancer, white blood cell count upon rehabilitation admission, platelet count, albumin level, prealbumin level, creatinine level, and presence of antimicrobial agents were analyzed. Results: Forty-one percent (61/147) of bone marrow transplant patients were transferred from the inpatient rehabilitation unit back to the primary service. Of those transferred back, 38% died after being transferred back to the primary service; 53%, 36%, and 39% of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma transplant patients were transferred back to the primary service, respectively. No breast, germinoma, renal, testicular, or Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients were transferred back to primary service. Significant relationships were found with a platelet count < 43 (p<.01), a creatinine level > 0.9 (p<.05), the presence of an antibacterial agent (p<.05), the presence of an antifungal agent (p<.05) and leukemia, lymphoma or multiple myeloma type (p<.05). Using these 4 of these factors the Fu index was formulated to determine the likelihood of return to the primary team. Conclusions: Bone marrow transplant patients have a high rate of transfer from the inpatient rehabilitation unit back to the primary service and many of them eventually died while in the hospital. A low platelet count, a high creatinine level, the presence of an antibacterial agent, and the presence of an antifungal agent significantly increased the risk of return to primary. Close follow-up by the primary team while on the inpatient rehabilitation unit is recommended.

Author(s):  
Cameron K. Ledford ◽  
Alexander R. Vap ◽  
Michael P. Bolognesi ◽  
Samuel S. Wellman

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S198-S199
Author(s):  
P. Emerson ◽  
S. Mahendran ◽  
L. Stefani ◽  
T. Deshmukh ◽  
S. Trivedi ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan S Biel ◽  
Andreas Nitsche ◽  
Andreas Kurth ◽  
Wolfgang Siegert ◽  
Muhsin Özel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: We studied electron microscopy (EM) as an appropriate test system for the detection of polyomavirus in urine samples from bone marrow transplant patients. Methods: We evaluated direct EM, ultracentrifugation (UC) before EM, and solid-phase immuno-EM (SPIEM). The diagnostic accuracy of EM was studied by comparison with a real-time PCR assay on 531 clinical samples. Results: The detection rate of EM was increased by UC and SPIEM. On 531 clinical urine samples, the diagnostic sensitivity of EM was 47% (70 of 149) with a specificity of 100%. We observed a linear relationship between viral genome concentration and the proportion of urine samples positive by EM, with a 50% probability for a positive EM result for urine samples with a polyomavirus concentration of 106 genome-equivalents (GE)/mL; the probability of a positive EM result was 0% for urine samples with &lt;103 GE/mL and 100% for urine samples containing 109 GE/mL. Conclusions: UC/EM is rapid and highly specific for polyomavirus in urine. Unlike real-time PCR, EM has low sensitivity and cannot quantify the viral load.


BMJ ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 1 (5739) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. O. Solberg ◽  
H. J. Meuwissen ◽  
R. N. Needham ◽  
R. A. Good ◽  
J. M. Matsen

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohail Khattak ◽  
John W. Rogan ◽  
E. Fred Saunders ◽  
Jochen G. W. Theis ◽  
Gerald S. Arbus ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-159
Author(s):  
Kay Washington ◽  
William Peters ◽  
Marcia R. Gottfried

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Russell ◽  
W. B. Blahey ◽  
T. A. Stuart ◽  
G. Edwards ◽  
R. T. Card

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document