Obinutuzumab (GA101) Monotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma or Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the Phase II GAUGUIN Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (23) ◽  
pp. 2912-2919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Andre Morschhauser ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Philippe Solal-Céligny ◽  
Corinne Haioun ◽  
...  

Purpose Obinutuzumab (GA101), a type II, glycoengineered, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was superior to rituximab in human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) xenograft models. In phase I of our study, obinutuzumab (GA101) exhibited encouraging activity but no clear dose-response relationship, and few patients had aggressive histologies. The efficacy and safety of two doses of obinutuzumab (GA101) were explored in our randomized phase II trial in patients with heavily pretreated DBLCL and MCL. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive eight cycles of obinutuzumab (GA101) either as a flat dose of 400 mg for all infusions (days 1 and 8 of cycle 1; day 1 of cycles 2 to 8) or 1,600 mg on days 1 and 8 of cycle 1 and 800 mg on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8. Results Forty patients were enrolled: 21 patients in the 400/400-mg treatment arm (DLBCL, n = 10; MCL, n = 11) and 19 patients in the 1,600/800-mg arm (DLBCL, n = 15; MCL, n = 4). End-of-treatment response was 28% (32% and 24% in the 1,600/800-mg and 400/400-mg study arms, respectively). Best overall response rates were 37% in the 1,600/800-mg arm and 24% in the 400/400-mg study arm (DLBCL, eight [32%] of 25 patients; MCL, four [27%] of 15 patients). Five (20%) of 25 rituximab-refractory patients exhibited treatment response, including four of 12 in the 1,600/800-mg group. The most common adverse events were infusion-related reactions (IRRs), which were manageable. Three patients had grade 3/4 IRRs. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in only one patient. Conclusion Obinutuzumab (GA101) 1,600/800 mg achieves early steady-state concentration and clinical activity with an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory DLBCL and MCL, supporting further exploration.

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 569-575.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Yazbeck ◽  
Danielle Shafer ◽  
Edward B. Perkins ◽  
Domenico Coppola ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
...  

Hematology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 2004 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard I. Fisher ◽  
Thomas P. Miller ◽  
Owen A. O'Connor

Abstract The aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas can be cured in more than half of the cases. However, there has been great variation in the results reported from individual clinical Phase II trials. This variation in result can be attributed to unrecognized heterogeneity in this group of diseases. Recent clinical and molecular studies have enabled us to define more homogenous population in which new therapies can be studied. For patients with advanced stages of diffuse large B cell lymphoma, a new standard of therapy exists. For patients with localized aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, heterogeneity in patient selection prevents us from defining a new standard of care. Finally, in mantle cell lymphoma, new opportunities in drug discovery may permit advances in the treatment of this uniformly fatal malignancy. In Section I, Dr. Richard Fisher reviews the development of combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Because of great heterogeneity in patients enrolled in Phase II studies, large randomized Phase III studies were required in the 1980s to define CHOP has the standard of care. This heterogeneity has now been defined carefully in the international prognostic factor index and more recently by gene array studies. It will now need to be incorporated prospectively into studies or retrospectively analyzed to understand clinical trial results. The addition of rituximab to CHOP has now been demonstrated to improve survival in two large Phase III studies in elderly patients. A recently presented study in younger patients suggests a similar benefit. Thus CHOP/rituximab has become the established standard of care for all patients with advanced stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Other concepts being evaluated to further improve on these results include: dose intensification; initial treatment with chemotherapy plus allogeneic stem cell transplantation; and infusional chemotherapy. Finally, the status of the treatment for relapsed patients will be defined. In Section II, Dr. Thomas Miller defines the treatment for limited stage aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Randomized trials have demonstrated the critical importance of initial chemotherapy for treatment of these patients. The amount of chemotherapy given needs to be increased for patients with bulky tumors. In most circumstances radiotherapy after the completion of chemotherapy has been shown to be advantageous. A modification of the international prognostic factor index for patients with early stage disease is presented to permit comparisons among different populations. Recently reported early-stage studies need to be analyzed in terms of the heterogeneity of the patients involved to understand the reported results. The addition of monoclonal antibodies, as well as radioimmunotherapy, are being tested in an effort to improve on the results for the poor prognosis patients. In Section III, Dr. Owen O’Connor describes the pathology immunophenotype and natural history of mantle cell lymphoma. Conventional treatment strategies with combination chemotherapy achieved objective responses in approximately half of the patients but no significant impact on survival. The addition to rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy or other treatment strategies appears to improve the remission rate; however, no major changes in survival have also been reported. Excellent single institution results have been reported with HyperCVAD plus rituximab regimen, which is currently being tested in a national cooperative group trial. The most excitement in this field currently relates to the variety of new agents which appear to have significant activity in relapsed patients with mantle cell lymphoma. This includes the proteosome inhibitor, bortezomib, which is shown to have approximately a 50% response rate with some CRs and reasonable durability in early single institution Phase II studies. Larger national multi-center trials are ongoing. In addition, agents such as thalidomide, flavopiridol, and piroxantrone will be reviewed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 690-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Ruan ◽  
Peter Martin ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Shing M. Lee ◽  
Ken Cheung ◽  
...  

PurposeThe proteasome inhibitor bortezomib may enhance activity of chemoimmunotherapy in lymphoma. We evaluated dose-escalated bortezomib plus standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) plus rituximab (R) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).Patients and MethodsSeventy-six subjects with untreated DLBCL (n = 40) and MCL (n = 36) received standard CHOP every 21 days (CHOP-21) with R plus bortezomib at 0.7 mg/m2(n = 4), 1.0 mg/m2(n = 9), or 1.3 mg/m2(n = 63) on days 1 and 4 for six cycles.ResultsMedian age was 63 years (range, 20 to 87), and International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores were generally unfavorable (39% with IPI of 2, and 49% with IPI of 3 to 5), as were Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores in patients with MCL (28% intermediate risk and 39% high risk). Toxicity was manageable, including neuropathy in 49 subjects (8% grade 2 and 4% grade 3) and grade 3/4 anemia (13%), neutropenia (41%), and thrombocytopenia (25%). For DLBCL, the evaluable overall response rate (ORR) was 100% with 86% complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu; n = 35). Intent-to-treat (ITT, n = 40) ORR was 88% with 75% CR/CRu, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 64% (95% CI, 47% to 77%) and 2-year overall survival (OS) of 70% (95% CI, 53% to 82%). For MCL, the evaluable ORR was 91% with 72% CR/CRu (n = 32). The ITT (n = 36) ORR was 81% with 64% CR/CRu, 2-year PFS 44% (95% CI, 27% to 60%) and 2-year OS 86% (95% CI, 70% to 94%). IPI and MIPI correlated with survival in DLBCL and MCL, respectively. Unlike in DLBCL treated with R-CHOP alone, nongerminal center B cell (non-GCB) and GCB subtypes had similar outcomes.ConclusionBortezomib with R-CHOP-21 can be safely administered and may enhance outcomes, particularly in non-GCB DLBCL, justifying randomized studies.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1718-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas Younes ◽  
Gilles Salles ◽  
R. Gregory Bociek ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Dolores Caballero ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), which includes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), is associated with a high unmet need in the relapsed and refractory setting. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway has been shown to play a key role in the pathogenesis of NHL. Overexpression of PIK3CD (encoding the PI3Kd isoform) is common in B-cell malignancies and is therefore widely viewed as a therapeutic target in NHL. PIK3CA and PIK3CB are also expressed in B-cell malignancies, with PIK3CA overexpression seen particularly at relapse, thereby justifying exploration of pan-PI3K inhibitors in the relapsed or refractory setting. Buparlisib (BKM120) is an oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor which has demonstrated activity in patients with solid tumors as well as in in vitro and in vivo models of hematologic malignancies. Methods: The primary objective of this Phase II study (NCT01693614) was to evaluate the efficacy of buparlisib in three parallel cohorts of adult patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL, FL, or MCL. Secondary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability, progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival. Inclusion criteria were: patients with relapsed or refractory disease who have received at least one prior line of therapy; at least one measurable nodal lesion (≥2 cm); ECOG performance status ≤2; and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Patients with DLBCL must have received, or be ineligible for, autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant. All patients received single-agent buparlisib 100 mg orally QD continuously until progression, intolerance, or patient withdrawal. Tumor response was evaluated by investigators per standard criteria (Cheson, 2007). Results: At data cut-off (June 19, 2014), 64 patients had been enrolled; 26 DLBCL, 24 FL, and 14 MCL. Here, results are presented for the DLBCL cohort only. Updated results from the DLBCL cohort including biomarker analyses and results for the FL cohort will be presented at the meeting. The MCL cohort is currently enrolling. For the DLBCL cohort, median age (range) was 63.5 (28–81) years and 69% were male. The median (range) number of prior therapy regimens was 3 (1–12). Specific prior therapies included: rituximab (n=25, 96%) and bendamustine/carmustine (n=8, 31%); all patients had received prior anthracycline and an alkylating agent (e.g. cyclophosphamide), and 6 (23%) patients had undergone prior stem cell transplantation. The most common (≥15%) AEs (all grades) regardless of causality were hyperglycemia and nausea (39% each), depression (31%), anxiety and fatigue (23% each), vomiting and diarrhea (19% each), and abdominal pain (15%). Alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase elevations were rare (4% each, with no Grade 3/4 AEs). The most common (>5%) Grade 3/4 AEs regardless of causality were hyperglycemia (23%), and nausea, depression, anxiety, urinary tract infection, and neutropenia (8% each). Six (23%) patients discontinued therapy due to AEs (potentially treatment-related). Seven on-treatment deaths were reported: 6 were disease-related and 1 was suspected to be treatment-related (unexplained death following a gastrointestinal [GI] bleed in a patient with massive GI lymphoma involvement). Overall response rate was 12% (95% CI = 2.4, 30.2) with 3 responses: 1 complete response (4%) and 2 partial responses (8%). Five patients had stable disease (19%). Eight patients (31%) experienced some decrease in tumor burden (Figure 1). At data cut-off, 2 patients demonstrated durable responses, as they were still on study treatment after 9.2 and 7.4 months, respectively. Figure 1 Figure 1. Conclusions: Early results from this Phase II study of the pan-PI3K inhibitor, buparlisib, demonstrate encouraging clinical activity, and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. These data suggest that targeting all 4 PI3K isoforms in DLBCL is a viable strategy and worthy of further exploration in patients with NHL. Future combination studies with buparlisib will take a mechanism-based approach. Disclosures Younes: Novartis, Curis, J&J: Research Funding; Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Incyte, Janssen R&D: Honoraria; Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda Millenium: Honoraria. Mukherjee:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. India: Employment. Williams:Novartis: Employment. Herbst:Novartis: Employment. Tavorath:Novartis: Employment. Kim:Novartis, Celgene, Takeda: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1662-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Rigacci ◽  
Benedetta Puccini ◽  
Enrico Orciuolo ◽  
Alfonso D'Arco ◽  
Sergio Storti ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1662 Poster Board I-688 Introduction Bendamustine is an alkylating agent with a nitrogen mustard group and a purine like benzimidazol group. Recently this drug was introduced in Italy. We analized all pts treated in sixteen haematological Italian centers with Bendamustine alone or in combination with anti-CD20 antibody. Patients and methods On an intention to treat basis pts who have received at least one complete cycle were evaluable for response and toxicity. The treatments consisted of: Bendamustine 60-90 mg/m2 days 1,2 alone or in combination with Rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 0, every 21 or 28 days. 173 pts were analized, median age was 67 (range 31-87), 114 were male, 63 chronic lymphatic leukaemia 41 indolent non-follicular lymphoma, 26 diffuse large B cell lymphoma, 26 follicular lymphoma, 15 mantle cell lymphoma, 2 Peripheral T cell lymphoma. Pts were heavily pretreated, the median number of previous treatments was 3,5 (range 1-8), 121 pts have experienced more than three chemotherapy schemes. One hundred and twenty-seven pts were previously treated with Rituximab and 24 performed an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The Bendamustine pre-treatment condition was: 70 relapsed pts, 40 with refractory disease and 63 with a progressive disease after partial response. The median number of Bendamustine cycles was 4.3 (range 1-11). Results All patients were evaluable for response: 48 pts (28%) obtained a complete remission, 78 (45%) a partial response or stable disease with an overall response rate of 73% and 47 were non responders. According to histotype we observed that 10/15 pts (67%) with mantle cell lymphoma obtained a response (6 CR;4 PR), 37/41 (9 CR; 28 PR) indolent non follicular lymphoma and 25/26 (96%) follicular lymphoma obtained a response (12 CR;13 PR), 46/63 CLL obtained a response and 8/26 (31%) DLBCL obtained a response to therapy (4 CR;4 PR), none of the two T lymphoma pts responded to therapy. With a median period of observation of 12 months (1-46) 121 (70%) pts are alive and 83 pts are in complete remission or with stable disease without any other treatment. The overall survival was 82%, 72%, 68% and 27% respectively for indolent, CLL, mantle cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The progression free survival was 31%, 27%, 15% and 10% respectively for indolent, CLL, mantle cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Fifthy-two pts died, 47 for progressive disease, 11 due to infection and sepsis (6%) and 2 due to other causes not related with therapy or disease. In this group of heavily pretreated pts 760 cycles were performed. The extrahematological toxicity was mild the most important problem were infections (Herpes Zooster, pneumonia, enteritis) reported in 16 pts, hepatic in 4 and cardiologic in 2 pts. The hematological toxicity was trombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 20 pts (12%), neutropenia grade 3-4 in 40 pts (23%) and anemia grade 3-4 in 19 pts (11%). Discussion In conclusion this retrospective study shows that treatment with Bendamustine alone or in combination with Rituximab is a safe and efficacy regimen in a subset of pluriresistent patients. This data shows also that the best results could be obtained in indolent lymphoma and CLL incouraging data in mantle cell lymphoma are reported. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 184 (4) ◽  
pp. 647-650
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Hudson ◽  
David Rizzieri ◽  
Samantha M. Thomas ◽  
Thomas W. LeBlanc ◽  
Zachary Powell ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 779-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beata Holkova ◽  
Edward B. Perkins ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
Kristy L. Richards ◽  
Samir Parekh ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 779FN2 Numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic interactions between proteasome and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors which interact to induce cell death in various human tumors, particularly indolent B-cell malignancies such as multiple myeloma. Furthermore, recent phase I studies have shown promising results for proteasome/HDAC inhibitor regimens in myeloma. The primary objective of this phase II study was to estimate the response rates of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), or relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib administered in conjunction with the pan-HDAC inhibitor vorinostat. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 cohorts: (A) bortezomib - naïve MCL; (B) bortezomib - exposed MCL; and (C) relapsed or refractory DLBCL. The schedule of administration was vorinostat 400 mg administered orally on days 1–5 and 8–12, and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; on a 21 day cycle. Fifty-one patients have been enrolled and 47 treated, 17 in cohort A, 4 in cohort B, and 26 in cohort C. Cohort B was closed due to inadequate accrual. Patient characteristics included male/female n = 33 (70%)/14 (30%), median age = 62 years [range 33–83]. ECOG performance scores ranged from 0–2. The median number of prior therapies was 2 [range 0–8]. Common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue, dizziness, leukopenia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, elevated creatinine, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and chills. Common grade 3 and 4 toxicities (CTCAE v4) included anemia, diarrhea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, dehydration, hyponatremia, and hypotension. Two deaths have occurred: 1 associated with neutropenic sepsis and felt possibly related to study treatment, and 1 due to disease progression after discontinuation of study treatment. Patients were accrued according to a 2-stage Simon minimax design. Investigator-reported responses (CR + PR) have been achieved in cohort A (8 out of 17, 47%) and cohort C (3 out of 26, 12%). Both of these response rates met the thresholds to proceed from the 1st to the 2nd stage of enrollment.CohortTotalABCResponseComplete Response (CR)2–13Partial Response (PR)6–28Stable Disease (SD)32510Progressive Disease (PD)521522Too Early To Evaluate1––1Not Assessed––33Total1742647 Correlative studies are ongoing and are designed to determine whether the combination of bortezomib and vorinostat is more active in lymphomas in which baseline activation of NF-kappa B can be detected. Sample analysis and results are pending. These findings indicate that combined treatment with vorinostat and bortezomib is active in patients with MCL, or relapsed or refractory DLBCL, particularly for MCL where the 47% response rate greatly exceeds the 29% (8 of 28) needed to proceed to stage 2. Disclosures: Sokol: Medimmune: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Allos: Consultancy. Richards:Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document