Pepaxto: A New Peptide-Drug Conjugate for Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Objective: The objective of this article was to review existing data of melflufen (Pepaxto) as an additional treatment option for heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Data sources: A PubMed search was completed using the search terms melphalan flufenamide; melflufen; melflufen AND relapsed refractory multiple myeloma; melphalan flufenamide and relapsed refractory multiple myeloma between January 1, 2013, and October 18, 2021. Additional information was obtained from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trial Registry, Federal Drug Administration (FDA) web updates, and Pepaxto prescribing information. Study selection/data extraction: Clinical trials including melflufen in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma and trials related to safety and clinical pharmacology were included. Data synthesis: The findings of this review show melflufen in combination with dexamethasone can be used as a treatment option for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have previously received greater than 4 previous lines of therapy, and documented resistance to a proteosome inhibitor, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and an immunomodulator. Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: Melflufen in combination with dexamethasone is a reasonable option for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least 4 previous lines of therapy and considered ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant. Further clinical utilization in earlier lines of therapy is under review, pending the in-depth safety analysis by the FDA. Conclusions: The FDA approval of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone provides an additional therapy option for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Case Report: Combination of Olaparib With Chemotherapy in a Patient With ATM-Deficient Colorectal Cancer

Poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are constantly increasing in their indications for use as anti-cancer treatment in various neoplasms, the majority of which are linked with BRCA deficiency. Preclinical data support the investigation of PARP inhibitors in other neoplasms exhibiting “BRCAness” or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) as monotherapy as well as in combination with chemotherapy. With the current report we present the case of a heavily pretreated 55-year-old male patient diagnosed with stage IV ATM-deficient CRC, who was effectively treated with an off-label olaparib-irinotecan combination after exhaustion of all available treatment choices; furthermore, we discuss the existing data providing evidence for the use of PARP inhibitors in ATM-deficient CRC and encourage the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with no other available treatment options.

Target therapy of luminal HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with PIK3CA mutation: combination of alpelisib plus fulvestrant in real clinical practice

Introduction. Сombination of alpelisib plus fulvestrant is approved in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC) after progression on hormonotherapy. Efficacy data of alpelisib in heavily pretreated patients with HR+/HER-2-, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer are limited, only results from phase I trial are available. Here we report our results of alpelisib efficacy in 19 heavily pretreated patients.Object: to evaluate efficacy and safety of combination alpelisib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR+/HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer in initial and later lines of therapy in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. Combination of alpelisib plus fulvestrant was investigated in 19 patients with HR+/HER2-, PIK3CAmutated ABC, alpelisib at a dose of 300 mg per day plus fulvestrant at a dose of 500 mg i.m. every 28 days and once on day 15. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.Results. From February 2021 19 patients with HR+/HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer were treated with alpelisib plus fulvestrant. The data cut off is October 2021. Median lines of treatment in advanced disease was five, including 19 (100%) patients received CDK4/6, 14 (74%) – fulvestrant and/or everolimus and 15 (79%) – chemotherapy. 4 (21%) received alpelisib in a second line, 15 (79%) – in subsequent lines. Median progression-free survival was 7 months. The response was evaluated in 18 patients: partial response was achieved in 5 (28%) patients, stable disease – in 9 (50%), disease progression – 4 (22%). The most frequent adverse events were hyperglycemia – 74% (grade 3 – 22%), creatinine increased – 42% and rash – 37% (grade 3 – 22%). Only one patient has discontinued the treatment due to Quincke`s edema.Conclusions. Combination of alpelisib with fulvestrant is an effective option both in initial and later lines of therapy in patients with HR+/HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer including fulvestrant, CDK4/6 inhibitors and/or everolimus – pretreated patients.

An Exploration of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Pretreated Advanced Gastric Cancer

Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and irinotecan are treatment options for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer but with limited efficacies. We investigated the combination of FTD/TPI and irinotecan for such patients.Methods: Patients who refractory to fluoropyrimidine, platinum and taxane were enrolled into four cohorts (Level 1A/1B/2A/2B) used an escalated dose of irinotecan [100 (Level 1) or 125 mg/m2 (Level 2) on days 1 and 15] with 2 schedules of FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2/dose: twice daily, on days 1-5 and 8-12 (Level A) or on days 1-5 and days 15-19 (Level B) of a 28-day cycle. The primary and secondary objectives were determination of maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) , and evaluation of disease control rate (DCR), respectively. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled; 2 at Level 1A, 3 at Level 1B and 6 at Level 2B. DLTs occurred in 2/2 patient at Level 1A, and 2/6 patients at Level 2B. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (90.9%), leukopenia (54.5%), anemia (45.5%) and febrile neutropenia (18.2%). One patient at Level 2B achieved partial response and the DCR was 72.7% (95% CI 39.0- 94.0%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival was 3.0 months (95% CI 0.92- not reached) and 10.2 months (95% CI 2.2- not reached), respectively.Conclusion: The RP2D of FTD/TPI combined with irinotecan was determined to be Level 1B with manageable hematologic toxicities and feasible non-hematologic toxicities. Further evaluation for its efficacy in the RP2D is necessary. Mini-abstract: A phases Ib study of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with irinotecan for advanced gastric cancer determined the recommended dose with manageable hematologic toxicities and feasible non-hematologic toxicities.

Promising Antigens for the New Frontier of Targeted Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma

The incorporation of novel agents in recent treatments in multiple myeloma (MM) has improved the clinical outcome of patients. Specifically, the approval of monoclonal antibody (MoAb) against CD38 (daratumumab) and SLAMF7 (elotuzumab) in relapsed and refractory MM (RRMM) represents an important milestone in the development of targeted immunotherapy in MM. These MoAb-based agents significantly induce cytotoxicity of MM cells via multiple effector-dependent mechanisms and can further induce immunomodulation to repair a dysfunctional tumor immune microenvironment. Recently, targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), an even MM-specific antigen, has shown high therapeutic activities by chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), as well as bispecific antibody (BiAb), with some already approved for heavily pretreated RRMM patients. New antigens, such as orphan G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) and FcRH5, were identified and rapidly moved to ongoing clinical studies. We here summarized the pathobiological function of key MM antigens and the status of the corresponding immunotherapies. The potential challenges and emerging treatment strategies are also discussed.

A New Kid on the Block: Sacituzumab Govitecan for the Treatment of Breast Cancer and Other Solid Tumors

Human trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is a membrane glycoprotein involved in cell proliferation and motility, frequently overexpressed in epithelial tumors. Thus, it represents an attractive target for anticancer therapies. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a third-generation antibody-drug conjugate, consisting of an anti-Trop-2 monoclonal antibody (hRS7), a hydrolyzable linker, and a cytotoxin (SN38), which inhibits topoisomerase 1. Specific pharmacological features, such as the high antibody to payload ratio, the ultra-toxic nature of SN38, and the capacity to kill surrounding tumor cells (the bystander effect), make SG a very promising drug for cancer treatment. Indeed, unprecedented results have been observed with SG in patients with heavily pretreated advanced triple-negative breast cancer and urothelial carcinomas, and the drug has already received approval for these indications. These results are coupled with a manageable toxicity profile, with neutropenia and diarrhea as the most frequent adverse events, mainly of grades 1–2. While several trials are exploring SG activity in different tumor types and settings, potential biomarkers of response are under investigation. Among these, Trop-2 overexpression and the presence of BRCA1/2 mutations seem to be the most promising. We review the available literature concerning SG, with a focus on its toxicity spectrum and possible biomarkers of its response.

Pembrolizumab in Combination with Bevacizumab and Oral Cyclophosphamide in Heavily Pretreated Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely implemented in the treatment of solid tumors. Although epithelial ovarian carcinoma is considered as scarcely immunogenic, the presence of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) in the ovarian tumor microenvironment (TME) could increase sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Combinations of ICIs with chemotherapy, anti-VEGF compounds and PARP inhibitors are under evaluation in ovarian cancer. Recently, a Phase II study evaluated the efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Combination with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant, or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer.Methods: Herein, we present a retrospective study of all patients who received pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide for recurrent platinum-resistant heavily pretreated ovarian cancer in the Oncology Unit of Alexandra University Hospital.Results: Median age at diagnosis was 54.5 years (SD; 8.9; range: 44–72). All patients were diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). Initial disease stage was FIGO IIIC (8/10; 80%), IIIB (1/10; 10%) and IIC (1/10; 10%)). Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 6 (range: 4–9) prior lines of systemic therapy. All patients have experienced disease progression on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and median PFS to first-line treatment was 20.1 months (95%CI; 11.4 – 28.7). Patients received a median of 4 cycles of pembrolizumab in combination with cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab (range 2-11). ORR was 20% (2/10) with two patients achieving partial response (PR) and two patients achieving stable disease (SD) while disease control rate (DCR) was 40% (4/10). Median PFS was 2.7 months (95%; 0.6 – 4.8) and 6-month PFS rate 20%. Conclusions: Though our data reflect a small population, we here demonstrate that the combination of pembrolizumab with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide is an effective alternative in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian carcinoma. This novel combination provides a promising alternative in heavily pretreated patients that have otherwise limited treatment options.

Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone in the Management of Heavily Pretreated Multiple Myeloma

Pomalidomide is a new generation IMID, with a very good compliance, thanks to oral administration, which can be used also in heavily pretreated patients, in a domestic setting. In this retrospective observational trial, It has been evaluated efficacy and tolerance of pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (PD) as salvage regimen in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory MM (rrMM), whose prognosis is particularly severe. 57 patients (31 M/26 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 69 years (r. 52-86), and median age at start of treatment 76 years (r.56-90) treated with several lines of treatments (median 7, r. 2-11), every refractory to all the drugs previously received (also Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Lenalidomide), received Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (Pomalidomide 4 mg for 21 days, Dexamethasone 40 mg days 1,8,15,22, pegfilgrastim day +8) every 28 days, until progression. ISS was equally distributed, and cytogenetic at relapse was evaluable in 14 patients. All the patients had previously been treated with schedule containing bortezomib and IMIDs. 63% (36/57) had undergone at least to a single ASCT. All patients were relapsed and refractory to last therapies received before PD. Pomalidomide was well tolerated, with grade 3-4 transfusion-dependent anemia in 58% (33/57) of patients, 44% (23/57) grade 3-4 neutropenia (pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis was given, no hospitalization was required, no septic shocks were observed), 40% (23/57) grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia without hemorrhagic events and transfusion-dependence. No severe extra-hematologic toxicity was observed. According to IMWG, ORR1 (≥PR) was 47.3% (27/57: 5 CR, 11 VGPR, 7 PR, 4 MR), but, considering that we are evaluating a cohort of heavily pretreated patients, with poor prognosis, another parameter should be considered, ORR2 (≥SD), considering stable disease as a successful result in progressive MM. ORR2 was 77.1% (17 SD). These can be considered as impressive result in this subset of patients. Oral treatment gives a really good compliance, in frail and unfit patients, and response, when present, is always really fast (median time to response: 2 months (r.1-6)), median OS from diagnosis was 94 months (range 21-234), median OS from start of pomalidomide was 9 months (range 1-25). Nine patients have surprisingly achieved a notable response (3 VGPR, 4 PR, 2 MR) after failure of novel agents (i.e. Carfilzomib, Daratumumab and Pomalidomide). Pomalidomide-dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy and a very good compliance, thanks to oral administration, in a particularly severe setting of heavily pretreated patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, also after failure of novel agents. Disclosures Martinelli: Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene /BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.