scholarly journals Can Patient Navigation Improve Receipt of Recommended Breast Cancer Care? Evidence From the National Patient Navigation Research Program

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (25) ◽  
pp. 2758-2764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Y. Ko ◽  
Julie S. Darnell ◽  
Elizabeth Calhoun ◽  
Karen M. Freund ◽  
Kristin J. Wells ◽  
...  

Purpose Poor and underserved women face barriers in receiving timely and appropriate breast cancer care. Patient navigators help individuals overcome these barriers, but little is known about whether patient navigation improves quality of care. The purpose of this study is to examine whether navigated women with breast cancer are more likely to receive recommended standard breast cancer care. Patients and Methods Women with breast cancer who participated in the national Patient Navigation Research Program were examined to determine whether the care they received included the following: initiation of antiestrogen therapy in patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer; initiation of postlumpectomy radiation therapy; and initiation of chemotherapy in women younger than age 70 years with triple-negative tumors more than 1 cm. This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter quasi-experimental study funded by the National Cancer Institute to evaluate patient navigation. Multiple logistic regression was performed to compare differences in receipt of care between navigated and non-navigated participants. Results Among participants eligible for antiestrogen therapy, navigated participants (n = 380) had a statistically significant higher likelihood of receiving antiestrogen therapy compared with non-navigated controls (n = 381; odds ratio [OR], 1.73; P = .004) in a multivariable analysis. Among the participants eligible for radiation therapy after lumpectomy, navigated participants (n = 255) were no more likely to receive radiation (OR, 1.42; P = .22) than control participants (n = 297). Conclusion We demonstrate that navigated participants were more likely than non-navigated participants to receive antiestrogen therapy. Future studies are required to determine the full impact patient navigation may have on ensuring that vulnerable populations receive quality care.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 72-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Ko ◽  
Tracy Ann Battaglia ◽  
Julie Darnell ◽  
Elizabeth Calhoun ◽  
Frederick Snyder ◽  
...  

72 Background: The discrepancy in breast cancer outcomes for underserved populations has been linked to lack of receipt of quality treatment. Patient navigation programs are being rapidly adopted as a model to improve cancer outcomes for these vulnerable populations, yet the effect of navigation on their quality of cancer care is unknown. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the National Patient Navigation Research Program (PNRP) data to assess the impact of navigation on receipt of quality care among women diagnosed with breast cancer. Data pooled from 7 PRNP sites were used to determine the proportion of newly diagnosed cancer patients whose care met National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) quality metrics: 1) hormonal therapy for HR+ patients 2) post-lumpectomy radiation therapy; and 3) chemotherapy for hormone negative, >1cm tumors, in patients <70 years of age. Chi-square tests were performed to compare probability of receiving recommended care among navigated and control patients. Results: A total of 1,006 breast cancer patients eligible for treatment were enrolled across all sites: 491 (49%) in the intervention arm, 515 (51%) in the control arm (mean age: 56 years; 38% African American, 23% Hispanic; 13% uninsured and 38% Medicaid). Among those eligible for hormone therapy, 283/357 (79%) navigated patients received hormonal therapy compared to 237/371 (64%) of controls (p < 0.001). Among those eligible for radiation therapy post lumpectomy, 235/277 (85%) of navigated patients received radiation compared to 270/324 (83%) of controls (p=0.62). Among those eligible for chemotherapy, 79/122 (65%) of navigated patients received chemotherapy compared to 81/100 (81%) of controls (p < 0.007). Logistic regression models to determine the odds of receiving recommended care for navigated and non-navigated patients, adjusting for patient demographics, will be conducted. Conclusions: Navigation had a positive effect for receipt of hormonal therapy, but not for radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Future studies are needed to assess the role navigation may play in ensuring quality care for the most vulnerable.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 95s-95s
Author(s):  
M. Jaganathan ◽  
N.H. Zainal ◽  
N. Rajaram ◽  
T. Soo Hwang ◽  
M.Y. Abdul Wahab

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Malaysia and it is anticipated that incidence will increase by 49% from 2012 to 2025. Unfortunately, survival remains poor because of late presentation and poor adherence to evidence-based medicine. Barriers to early presentation include inadequate knowledge about the disease, financial issues, negative influence of relatives and perceived poor quality of care and services in state-run hospitals. Poor adherence to treatment is also a common struggle, and is further exacerbated by the use of traditional, alternative healing methods. While patient navigation (PN) programs have been shown to improve breast cancer outcomes in the US, its implementation and performance in low and middle income countries is not well studied. Aim: We sought to determine the impact of a PN program in reducing treatment delays and improving adherence to treatment and patient satisfaction, as well as to evaluate the barriers faced by women seeking breast cancer care in Malaysia. Methods: We established a nurse-led patient navigation center at a secondary government hospital in Klang. This clinical team involved the surgery, pathology, radiology and nursing departments and provided patient-centered care, including patient tracking and call reminder systems, family counseling, health education and decision aids. The community team involved a Patient Navigator Program Coordinator and a Community Navigator. We compared treatment delays and adherence to treatment between navigated patients and patients registered in the year prior to the PN program. We used Student t-tests and Pearson χ2 or Fisher's Exact tests to compare timeliness between navigated patients and patients registered in the year prior. Results: Of the 136 Malaysian women enrolled in the PNP in 2015, 48.9% were diagnosed with advanced disease (stage 3 or 4). Women with advance disease had a lower median monthly household income compared with women with early disease (USD $350 vs $540, P = 0.023). Women with advance disease were also less likely to have personal transportation to the hospital (36.4% vs 56.5%, P = 0.048). Compared with the year before PN, more navigated patients underwent mammography within 7 days of their first visit (96.4% vs 74.4%, P < 0.001) and received their diagnosis within 14 days of their first visit (80.0% vs 58.5%, P < 0.001). The proportion of women who met timeliness to treatment initiation was similar for navigated patients and patients in the year prior. The proportion of defaulters were marginally lesser among navigated patients compared with the year prior (4.4% vs 11.5%, P = 0.048). Conclusion: We found that integrating PN within a breast clinic of a middle income country is feasible, and in the long run, could improve outcomes for breast cancer patients. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the impact of the PN program on improving treatment completion and survival.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Bukowski ◽  
Sandra Gioia ◽  
Yanin Chavarri-Guerra ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Jessica St. Louis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Didier Verhoeven ◽  
Cary S. Kaufman ◽  
Robert Mansel ◽  
Sabine Siesling

This book demonstrates the complexity of care surrounding breast cancer and the difficulty in choosing the ideal treatment, especially when local resource issues intrude on the desired choices. High-quality breast cancer care requires constant communication among the treatment team with ongoing monitoring of the level of care the team provides. Excellent communication with the patient throughout her journey is needed in addition to a well-organized programme providing the broad spectrum of care necessary for a patient to receive optimal treatment in today’s environment. Ten key messages were identified.


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 461-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandte Stanley ◽  
Kimberly Jacob Arriola ◽  
Shakiyla Smith ◽  
Marc Hurlbert ◽  
Carolyn Ricci ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 3251-3256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Weber ◽  
Debra C. Mascarenhas ◽  
Lisa S. Bellin ◽  
Rachel E. Raab ◽  
Jan H. Wong

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres H. Perez‐Bustos ◽  
Mavalynne Orozco‐Urdaneta ◽  
Raúl Erazo ◽  
Patricia Cordoba‐Astudillo ◽  
David Gallo ◽  
...  

Mastology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 186-192
Author(s):  
Sandra Gioia ◽  
◽  
Lucia Brigagão ◽  
Cristiane Torres ◽  
Alessandra de Lima ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document