Nivolumab combined with hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation (HFSRT) for patients with recurrent high grade gliomas: A phase I trial (NCT02829931).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2084-TPS2084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solmaz Sahebjam ◽  
Peter A. J. Forsyth ◽  
John Arrington ◽  
Nam D. Tran ◽  
Michael Vishal Jaglal ◽  
...  

TPS2084 Background: Nivolumab is an IgG4 monoclonal antibody that targets the PD-1 immune checkpoint pathway and prevents binding of PD-1 with PD-L1 and PD-L2. Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 is found in the microenvironment of high grade gliomas and correlates with worse outcome providing a rationale for investigating nivolumab in this group of patients (pts) with very limited treatment options. Nivolumab monotherapy is well tolerated in recurrent glioblastoma pts. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that radiotherapy synergizes with anti PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and produces tumor regression and long-term survival in orthotopic murine models of glioma. This report describes an ongoing phase I trial of nivolumab in combination with HFSRT in pts with recurrent WHO grade III or IV gliomas. Methods: This phase I study includes a safety cohort of 6 pts followed by dose expansion cohort of 20 pts (NCT02829931). Pts with bevacizumab naïve recurrent WHO grade III or IV gliomas (maximum diameter of enhancing brain lesion ≤ 4 cm) are eligible. An interval of at least 6 months after the end of prior radiation therapy is required unless there is a new recurrence outside of the previous radiotherapy treatment field. Eligible patients will be treated with HFSRT to the recurrent tumor (30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions). Nivolumab will be started 5 days after HFSRT. It will be administered intravenously every 2 weeks (at 240 mg flat dose) for 4 months. After 4 months, nivolumab will be administered every 4 weeks at 480 mg flat dose. The primary study objectives are to determine safety and tolerability of nivolumab administered in combination with HFSRT to recurrent high grade gliomas. Secondary endpoints include determination of the preliminary antitumor activity (response rate, 6-months survival and 9-months survival rates), and exploring tissue and imaging biomarkers. Study Progress: At deadline for abstract submission, 5 patients have been treated on this study. Clinical trial information: NCT02829931.

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi5-vi5
Author(s):  
Solmaz Sahebjam ◽  
Peter Forsyth ◽  
Nam Tran ◽  
Arnold Etame ◽  
John Arrington ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND There is strong pre-clinical evidence that combining CTLA4 and PD-1/PDL-1 blockade with antiangiogenic agents and HFSRT independently enhance anti-tumor immune responses and tumor regression. METHODS This phase I study includes a safety cohort of 6 pts followed by dose expansion cohort of 26 pts. Pts with Bev naïve recurrent WHO grade III or IV gliomas (maximum diameter of enhancing brain lesion ≤ 4 cm) are eligible. An interval of at least 6 months after the end of prior RT is required unless there is a new recurrence outside of the previous RT treatment field. Eligible pts are treated with HFSRT to the recurrent tumor (30 Gy in 5 fractions) and 4 cycles of Nivo (3 mg/kg), Ipi (1 mg/kg) and Bev (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks followed by Nivo 240 mg and Bev 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for 4 months. After 4 months, Nivo is administered every 4 weeks at 480 mg flat dose and Bev is continued at every 2 week schedule. The primary study objectives are to determine safety and tolerability of above treatment. Secondary endpoints include response rate, 6 and 9-months survival rates, and exploring tissue and imaging biomarkers. RESULTS As of June 2019, safety cohort has been completed and accrual to dose expansion cohort is ongoing. Combination of HFSRT, Nivo, Ipi and Bev as above is well tolerated. The most common toxicities were grade 1 anorexia, grade 1 diarrhea, grade 1 elevation of alanine aminotransferase, grade 1 elevation of lipase and grade 1 infusion related reaction. One patient had grade 3 confusion which was reversible with use of corticosteroids. No dose limiting toxicity has been observed. CONCLUSIONS Combination of HFSRT with Nivo, Ipi and Bev was considered safe to be studied in expansion cohort. Updated safety and efficacy data will be presented.


2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 1484-1487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Stib ◽  
Michael Johnson ◽  
Alan Siu ◽  
M. Isabel Almira-Suarez ◽  
Zachary Litvack ◽  
...  

The authors describe the case of a large WHO Grade III anaplastic oligoastrocytoma extending through the anterior skull base and into the right nasal cavity and sinuses. Glial neoplasms are typically confined to the intracranial compartment within the brain parenchyma and rarely extend into the nasal cavity without prior surgical or radiation therapy. This 42-year-old woman presented with progressive headaches and sinus congestion. MR imaging findings revealed a large intracranial lesion with intranasal extension. Endoscopic nasal biopsy revealed pathology consistent with an infiltrating glioma. The patient subsequently underwent a combined transcranial/endonasal endoscopic approach for resection of this lesion. Pathological diagnosis revealed a WHO Grade III oligoastrocytoma. This report reviews the mechanisms of extradural glioma extension. To the authors' knowledge, it is the second report of a high-grade glioma exhibiting nasal extension without prior surgical or radiation treatment.


Author(s):  
Stephen J Price ◽  
Harry Bulstrode ◽  
Richard Mair

The term high-grade glioma (HGG) encompasses a number of histological entities that are considered by the WHO Classification as WHO Grade III and IV tumours. They have traditionally been considered as having similar behaviour and had been treated in a similar manner but recent advances in our understanding of tumour biology have led to the identification of molecular markers that are now central to the classification of these tumours. Normal human cells develop into cancer cells through a stepwise accumulation of genomic and epigenomic alterations and this chapter considers the molecular markers of gliomas and explains their significance before going on to discuss the optimal management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-445
Author(s):  
Sean J. Hipp ◽  
Stewart Goldman ◽  
Aradhana Kaushal ◽  
Andra Krauze ◽  
Deborah Citrin ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 535-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenyin Shi ◽  
Joshua D. Palmer ◽  
Maria Werner-Wasik ◽  
David W. Andrews ◽  
James J. Evans ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii81-iii81 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kono ◽  
Y. Arakawa ◽  
Y. Mineharu ◽  
F. Ohka ◽  
M. Kinoshita ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2029-2029
Author(s):  
Jennifer Leigh Clarke ◽  
Annette M Molinaro ◽  
Ashley A DeSilva ◽  
Jane E Rabbitt ◽  
Daryl C. Drummond ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina I. Jakacki ◽  
Allan Yates ◽  
Susan M. Blaney ◽  
Tianni Zhou ◽  
Robert Timmerman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document