Personalized risk stratification for patients with early prostate cancer (PRONTO): A Canadian team biomarker project.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
David Monty Berman ◽  
Robert Lesurf ◽  
Anna YW Lee ◽  
Palak Patel ◽  
Tamara Jamaspishvili ◽  
...  

109 Background: Current practice stratifies men with prostate cancer into risk groups based primarily on Gleason grade. When applied to biopsy samples, the Gleason grading is inaccurate due to sampling error and inter-observer variation. The result is that men either receive unnecessary surgical treatment, or they don’t receive adequate treatment, leading to worse outcomes. Previously published genomic tests have not successfully distinguished indolent low grade (G6 or GG1) cancers from their more aggressive intermediate grade (G7 or GG2 and 3) counterparts. PRONTO is specifically aimed at creating a multi-modal risk stratification tool to improve treatment stratification following a core biopsy diagnosis. Methods: PRONTO links 7 projects, each with novel diagnostic assays for risk stratification that focus on analysis of copy number variations (CNV), DNA hypermethylation, trans-differentiation, cancer metabolism, or the tumor microenvironment. We merged the best transcripts from each project into a single NanoString gene expression assay, measuring 393 transcripts, in a cohort of 365 cases of radical prostatectomy from low-to-intermediaterisk patients. To minimize sampling error, we took multiple samples, and obtained high grade, low grade and benign areas for each radical prostatectomy case. Results: Our primary goal was to develop a multivariate molecular classifier of grade that distinguished G6 from G7 (3+4 or 4+3). Cases were randomly partitioned into five equally sized groups. A supervised machine learning algorithm (random forests) was trained on samples from four of the groups, and then evaluated by testing on the fifth group. This process was repeated for each of the five groups, yielding a combined clinical and molecular classifier. DNA methylation profiles and CNV profiles are currently being integrated into our classifier Conclusions: We have developed a multivariate classifier that distinguishes low grade from intermediate grade prostate cancer. It will be clinically validated in biopsy samples from large cohorts of early prostate cancer patients.

Author(s):  
Rianne J. Hendriks ◽  
Marloes M. G. van der Leest ◽  
Bas Israël ◽  
Gerjon Hannink ◽  
Anglita YantiSetiasti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Risk stratification in men with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) requires reliable diagnostic tests, not only to identify high-grade PCa, also to minimize the overdetection of low-grade PCa, and reduction of “unnecessary” prostate MRIs and biopsies. This study aimed to evaluate the SelectMDx test to detect high-grade PCa in biopsy-naïve men. Subsequently, to assess combinations of SelectMDx test and multi-parametric (mp) MRI and its potential impact on patient selection for prostate biopsy. Methods This prospective multicenter diagnostic study included 599 biopsy-naïve patients with prostate-specific antigen level ≥3 ng/ml. All patients underwent a SelectMDx test and mpMRI before systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSGB). Patients with a suspicious mpMRI also had an in-bore MR-guided biopsy (MRGB). Histopathologic outcome of TRUSGB and MRGB was used as reference standard. High-grade PCa was defined as ISUP Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2. The primary outcome was the detection rates of low- and high-grade PCa and number of biopsies avoided in four strategies, i.e., (1) SelectMDx test-only, (2) mpMRI-only, (3) SelectMDx test followed by mpMRI when SelectMDx test was positive (conditional strategy), and (4) SelectMDx test and mpMRI in all (joint strategy). A positive SelectMDx test outcome was a risk score of ≥−2.8. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess clinical utility. Results Prevalence of high-grade PCa was 31% (183/599). Thirty-eight percent (227/599) of patients had negative SelectMDx test in whom biopsy could be avoided. Low-grade PCa was not detected in 35% (48/138) with missing 10% (18/183) high-grade PCa. Yet, mpMRI-only could avoid 49% of biopsies, not detecting 4.9% (9/183) of high-grade PCa. The conditional strategy reduces the number of mpMRIs by 38% (227/599), avoiding biopsy in 60% (357/599) and missing 13% (24/183) high-grade PCa. Low-grade PCa was not detected in 58% (80/138). DCA showed the highest net benefit for the mpMRI-only strategy, followed by the conditional strategy at-risk thresholds >10%. Conclusions SelectMDx test as a risk stratification tool for biopsy-naïve men avoids unnecessary biopsies in 38%, minimizes low-grade PCa detection, and misses only 10% high-grade PCa. Yet, using mpMRI in all patients had the highest net benefit, avoiding biopsy in 49% and missing 4.9% of high-risk PCa. However, if mpMRI availability is limited or expensive, using mpMRI-only in SelectMDx test positive patients is a good alternative strategy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 1278-1284
Author(s):  
Kyungeun Kim ◽  
Pil June Pak ◽  
Jae Y. Ro ◽  
Dongik Shin ◽  
Soo-Jin Huh ◽  
...  

Abstract Context.—The widespread use of the serum prostate-specific antigen test has increased the early detection of prostate cancer and consequently reduced grossly definable prostate cancers. Objective.—To find the most efficient gross sampling method for radical prostatectomy specimens not only preserving important prognostic factors but also being cost effective. Design.—We initially analyzed clinicopathologic features of the entire prostate sections from 148 radical prostatectomy specimens, which then were used to examine the impact of 5 partial sampling methods on tumor stage, Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, resection margin status, and paraffin block numbers. The methods included submission of (1) alternative slices, (2) alternative slices plus biopsy-positive posterior quarters, (3) every posterior half, (4) every posterior half plus one midanterior half, and (5) alternative slices plus peripheral 3-mm rim of the remaining prostate. Results.—Prostate cancers and their extraprostatic extension and resection margin involvement were commonly located in the right posterior portion of the prostate. Method 5 was most efficient, detecting all cases with extraprostatic extension and resection margin involvement and reducing 25% of paraffin blocks compared with the entire sampling of the prostate. The Gleason scores were retained in most of cases, except reversal of the primary and secondary Gleason grade component in only 2 cases (1%). Only 4 cases (3%) were downstaged within the same T2 stage. Conclusions.—These results demonstrate that sampling of alternative slices plus peripheral rim of the remaining prostate is the most efficient partial sampling method for radical prostatectomy specimens.


Radiology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 246 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Wang ◽  
Yousef Mazaheri ◽  
Jingbo Zhang ◽  
Nicole M. Ishill ◽  
Kentaro Kuroiwa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 151678
Author(s):  
Alexandre R. da Paz ◽  
Athanase Billis ◽  
Leandro L.L. Freitas ◽  
Larissa B.E. Costa ◽  
Icleia S. Barreto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document