Evaluating biomarkers in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with enzalutamide: PSA, circulating tumor cell counts, AR-V7 status and radiographic progression.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17569-e17569
Author(s):  
Shruti U. Gandhy ◽  
Fatima Karzai ◽  
Jennifer L. Marte ◽  
Marijo Bilusic ◽  
Sheri McMahon ◽  
...  

e17569 Background: Enzalutamideis ahighly effective treatment in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Although Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG) guidelines recommend continuing treatment until radiographic/clinical progression (rPD/cPD), many patients discontinue therapy for rising PSA alone. Methods: We conducted an open label, randomized phase 2 trial in mCRPC patients untreated with docetaxel, abiraterone, or enzalutamide, comparing enzalutamide alone or in combination with PROSTVAC, a therapeutic cancer vaccine designed to induce an anti-tumor immune response. The study discontinued accrual after planned interim analysis indicated no difference in progression between the two arms. Patients were followed beyond 1st of 3 confirmed PSA rises until rPD. 49 patients were analyzed for Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) count and AR-V7 status at 1st PSA rise and at rPD/cPD or last follow up. Results: 57 patients were enrolled with median follow up time of 55.4 mo. 49/57 (86%) patients had rising PSA; median time to 1st PSA rise for all patients was 6.4 mo (95% CI: 3.7-11.0 mo) after starting enzalutamide. 38/57 (67%) patients had progressive disease (majority with rPD; 1/38 (3%) with cPD); median time to progression for all patients was 23.3 mo (95% CI: 16.1-27.8 mo). 5 patients tested positive for AR-V7 within 30 days of rPD. In patients who experienced rPD/cPD, CTCs were detected in 11/24 (46%) samples taken at rPD vs. in only 3/24 (13%) samples taken at rising PSA. CTC counts were higher at rPD compared to samples taken at rising PSA (P = 0.004, Wilcoxon unpaired test). Of the 7 patients still being treated (median time on drug = 4.2 yrs), 2 experienced rising PSA; however none of the patients had detectable CTCs at a median of 30 days from last follow up. Conclusions: These data suggest that a rising PSA may not be a warning of near-term clinically significant disease progression in mCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide, given the 17-month difference between the first rise in PSA and ultimate rPD/cPD seen in this analysis. Further, CTCs and AR-V7 status associate strongly with rPD but not with rising PSA, adding biological rationale to the hypothesis that CTC counts and AR-V7 status are associated with disease progression. Collectively, these data highlight the need to continue to educate patients and providers on PCWG criteria for progression and appropriately-timed utilization of both therapies and diagnostic tests to maximize drug efficacy in mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT01867333 .

The Prostate ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (14) ◽  
pp. 1683-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Sartor ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Neil Mariados ◽  
Maria José Méndez Vidal ◽  
Daniel Keizman ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 2023-2029 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Shaffer ◽  
Margaret A. Leversha ◽  
Daniel C. Danila ◽  
Oscar Lin ◽  
Rita Gonzalez-Espinoza ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5042-5042
Author(s):  
David Lorente ◽  
David Olmos ◽  
Joaquin Mateo ◽  
Zafeiris Zafeiriou ◽  
Pasquale Rescigno ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Jie-Fu Chen ◽  
Hao Ho ◽  
Elisabeth Hodara ◽  
Ann Go ◽  
Alexander Ureno ◽  
...  

64 Background: Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who develop visceral metastasis (VM) have a poorer clinical outcome in comparison to those without VM. Their clinical course is aggressive and culminates in organ failure as this process is often discovered late in the disease course. There are no existing tests that identify men at risk for VM. Our team has identified an association between the presence of very small nuclear circulating tumor cells (vsnCTCs) and VM. We hypothesized that vsnCTC that can predict the development of VM and monitor the response to anticancer treatment. Methods: In our database we identified mCRPC patients who had progressed through next generation hormonal maneuvers such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, or an equivalent drug. Serial blood specimens were used for vsnCTC enumeration using published methods. The vsnCTC counts were related to the presence and development of VM as well as the response to anticancer treatment. Results: Blood specimens were identified from 28 patients who met the eligibility criteria; 16/28 patients presented with VM and 12/28 had bone-only disease at their first CTC enumeration. Five out of 12 non-VM patients developed VM during follow-up, and vsnCTCs were detected 86-196 days prior to radiographic detection of VM (true positive); 3/12 had vsnCTCs detected but no VM was found by the time of analysis (false positive). None of the vsnCTC(-) patients developed VM. vsnCTCs were detected in 21/21 VM patients compared to 3/12 non-VM patients. Reduction of vsnCTC count occurred at initiation of anticancer treatment; transition from vsnCTC(-) to vsnCTC(+) was seen prior to progression under the treatment. Conclusions: vsnCTC is associated with the presence of VM and is a potential biomarker for predicting the development of VM and monitoring the treatment response in mCRPC. Transition from vsnCTC(-) to vsnCTC(+) was associated with the development of VM and progression under the treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document