Age-related differences in patterns of return to work and compensation costs following work-related injury or illness

Work ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca E. Gewurtz ◽  
Stephanie Premji ◽  
D. Linn Holness

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-104
Author(s):  
Eun-Ju Jo ◽  
◽  
Dong-Hee Noh ◽  
Seung-Hyup Han ◽  
Kyung-Yoon Kam

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Dong-Hee Noh ◽  
◽  
Eun-Ju Jo ◽  
Yun-Jun Cha ◽  
Seung-Hyup Han ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hee Tae Kang ◽  
Hyoung June Im ◽  
Yong Kyu Kim ◽  
Young Su Ju ◽  
Hwa Pyung Lee ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0022
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Idarraga ◽  
Adam Wright-Chisem ◽  
Daniel D. Bohl ◽  
Simon Lee ◽  
Johnny Lin ◽  
...  

Category: Hindfoot, Ankle, Midfoot/Forefoot, Injury and Rehabilitation Introduction/Purpose: The functional capacity evaluation (FCE) is used to determine a worker’s physical ability after treatment of a work-related injury. This evaluation is a critical determinant in the administration of benefits and the decision to return to work (RTW). The purpose of this study is to characterize FCE results and ability to RTW among patients treated for work- related orthopaedic injuries to the foot or ankle. Methods: A retrospective medical record review from the practices of four orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons was conducted. Inclusion criteria were (1) treatment of a work-related injury to the foot or ankle, (2) at least 2 years of follow-up from the injury, and (3) documentation of an associated FCE. The FCE report and clinic notes were used to determine the patient’s pre-injury job requirement (Department of Labor Office category: light, medium, or heavy), post-injury FCE-determined work ability (light, medium, or heavy), specific FCE- or physician-imposed work restrictions, and clearance for RTW. Patients were considered cleared to RTW if their FCE-determined work ability met or exceeded their pre-injury job requirement and if there were no additional restrictions imposed by the FCE or physician that would prevent them from functioning in their pre-injury role. Results: A total of 188 patients met inclusion criteria. Missteps/rotational injuries (44.1%), falls from height (22.3%), and crush injuries (20.7%) were the most common mechanisms. 74.4% of patients had FCE-determined work abilities at or above their pre- injury job requirements, and 63.3% of patients were eventually cleared for RTW. The median time from injury to clearance for RTW was 2.0 ± 1.3 years. Reasons for not being cleared to RTW included failure to meet the pre-injury job requirement (67.2%), specific FCE-imposed limitations (28.3%), or specific physician-imposed limitations (4.5%). Less strenuous pre-injury job requirement was positively associated with both FCE-determined work ability meeting pre-injury job requirement and clearance for RTW (p<0.001 and p=0.034, respectively; Table 1). Conclusion: Approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing FCE after a work-related foot or ankle injury are cleared to RTW. However, it takes a median of two years to achieve this clearance. Patients with jobs that are more physically strenuous are less likely to be able to return to those jobs after injury to the foot or ankle.


1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-6
Author(s):  
Reginald J. Alston

This article discusses the importance of counseling in the rehabilitation of persons with work related injury. Counseling interventions that rehabilitation counselors can use to facilitate the industrially injured person's adjustment to the injury and return to work are described. Special focus is on the adjustment issues of frustration and anger, motivation, and self-concept. Case studies are provided to accentuate the discussions. Implications for rehabilitation practice and research are presented.


2020 ◽  
pp. injuryprev-2020-043663
Author(s):  
Kyung-Eun Lee ◽  
Jinhee Kim ◽  
Jihye Lee

ObjectiveWith population ageing, the number of older workers is increasing and the number of work-related injuries in older people is also increasing. Occupational patterns and work-related injury patterns vary with age. This study aimed to compare the incidence and characteristics of work-related injuries in older and younger workers in Korea.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of the characteristics of workers hospitalised with work-related injuries from January 2010 to December 2014, using data from the National Hospital Discharge In-Depth Injury Survey in South Korea. The analysis was stratified by age into older (aged ≥65 years) and younger (aged 20–64 years) workers.ResultsThe hospitalisation rate in older workers was double that of younger workers (2014 IRR: 2.06, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.76). Compared with workers of conventional working-age, a higher proportion of injured older workers were female (33.1% vs 13.6%, p<0.001), injured due to falls (40.8% vs 28.5%) and injured while working on a farm (46.5% vs 6.3%, p<0.001). In older workers, work-related injuries were seasonal and peaked during summer, but there was little seasonality in injuries among younger workers.ConclusionOlder workers are more vulnerable to work-related injuries and have a different profile of work-related injuries from younger workers. Age-related differences in the injury profile need to be considered when developing workplace injury prevention policies and programmes, and the specific vulnerabilities of older workers need to be addressed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document