The Autologous Vein Grafts in Reconstructive Microsurgery for Lymph Stasis

Author(s):  
Corradino Campisi
2021 ◽  
pp. 153857442098061
Author(s):  
Florian K. Enzmann ◽  
Peter Metzger ◽  
Julio Ellacuriaga San Martin ◽  
Werner Dabernig ◽  
Fatema Akhavan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Despite advances of endovascular interventions, bypass surgery remains the gold standard for treatment of long and complex arterial occlusions in the lower limb. Autologous vein is regarded superior to other options. As the graft of first choice, the great saphenous vein (GSV) is often not available due to previous bypass, stripping or poor quality. Other options like arm veins (AV) are important alternatives. As forearm portions of AVs are often unusable, a graft created from the upper arm basilic and cephalic veins provides a valuable alternative. Patients and Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients treated at an academic tertiary referral center between 01/1998 and 07/2018 using arm veins as the main peripheral bypass graft. Study endpoints were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage and survival. Results: In the observed time period 2702 bypass procedures were performed at our institution for below-knee arterial reconstructions. Vein grafts used included the ipsilateral GSV (iGSV; n = 1937/71.7%), contralateral GSV (cGSV; 192/7.1%), small saphenous vein (SSV; 133/4.9%), prosthetic conduits (61/2.3%) and different configurations of AV (379/14%). In the majority of patients receiving AV grafts a complete continuous cephalic or basilic vein (CAV) was used (n = 292/77%). If it was not possible to use major parts of these 2 veins, either spliced arm vein grafts (SAV) (42/11%) or an upper arm basilic-cephalic loop graft (45/12%) were used. Median follow-up was 27 (interquartile range: 8-50) months. After 3 years secondary patency (CAV: 85%; SAV: 62%; loop: 66%; p = 0.125) and limb salvage rates (CAV: 79%, SAV: 68%; loop: 79%; p = 0.346) were similar between the 3 bypass options. Conclusion: The encouraging results of alternative AV configurations highlight their value in case the basilic or cephalic veins are not useable in continuity. Especially for infragenual redo-bypass procedures, these techniques should be considered to offer patients durable revascularization options.


Biomaterials ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.L.J. Hinrichs ◽  
H.-P. Zweep ◽  
S. Satoh ◽  
J. Feijen ◽  
Ch.R.H. Wildevuur
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Kopesky ◽  
Mrinal K. Dewanjee ◽  
Meng F. Lim ◽  
Michael P. Kaye

1991 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Yukizane ◽  
K. Okadome ◽  
H. Eguchi ◽  
Y. Muto ◽  
K. Sugimachi

2008 ◽  
Vol 172 (3) ◽  
pp. 839-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanpeng Diao ◽  
Steve Guthrie ◽  
Shen-Ling Xia ◽  
Xiaosen Ouyang ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 788-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.W. Landymore ◽  
M.S. Manku ◽  
M. Tan ◽  
M.A. MacAulay ◽  
B. Sheridan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document