Comparison of Finite Difference, Finite Element and Boundary Element Methods for electrostatic charged particle optics

Author(s):  
D Cubric ◽  
B Lencova ◽  
F H Read
2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (S4) ◽  
pp. 182-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank H. Read

AbstractThe high accuracy that can be achieved by the Boundary Element Method when it is used to solve the Laplace and Poisson equations for electrostatic systems is discussed. Applications to charged particle optics are described, with the emphasis on the commercial CPO programs [1]. The BEM is a charge-based method and so is ideally suitable for systems that include space-charge and/or cathodes. It can deal easily with electrodes of very different sizes. These and other properties of the BEM are illustrated by a range of benchmark tests.


1991 ◽  
Vol 23 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 517-524
Author(s):  
M. Kanoh ◽  
T. Kuroki ◽  
K. Fujino ◽  
T. Ueda

The purpose of the paper is to apply two methods to groundwater pollution in porous media. The methods are the weighted finite difference method and the boundary element method, which were proposed or developed by Kanoh et al. (1986,1988) for advective diffusion problems. Numerical modeling of groundwater pollution is also investigated in this paper. By subdividing the domain into subdomains, the nonlinearity is localized to a small region. Computational time for groundwater pollution problems can be saved by the boundary element method; accurate numerical results can be obtained by the weighted finite difference method. The computational solutions to the problem of seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers are compared with experimental results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document