Inductive loop installation and loop system sensitivity

Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Klein
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 470-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sheik Mohammed Ali ◽  
Lelitha Vanajakshi ◽  
Boby George

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 237-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Engvold ◽  
E. Jensen ◽  
B.N. Andersen

A detailed description of the development of loops connected with flares has been given by Bruzek (1964). Data on true mass motion as inferred from Doppler-effects are sparse in the literature as flare loop prominences are rare phenomena (Kleczek 1965). Jefferies and Orrall (1965) reported high velocities near the top of a loop system. Gurtovenko et al. (1969) observed large Doppler velocities in the loop system of July 11th. 1966.


1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (04) ◽  
pp. 108-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-J. Kaiser ◽  
U. Cremerius ◽  
O. Sabri ◽  
M. Schreckenberger ◽  
P. Reinartz ◽  
...  

Summary Aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) imaging in oncological patients with a dual head gamma camera modified for coincidence detection (MCD). Methods: Phantom studies were done to determine lesion detection at various lesion-to-background ratios, system sensitivity and spatial resolution. Thirty-two patients with suspected or known malignant disease were first studied with a dedicated full-ring PET system (DPET) applying measured attenuation correction and subsequently with an MCD system without attenuation correction. MCD images were first interpreted without knowledge of the DPET findings. In a second reading, MCD and DPET were evaluated simultaneously. Results: The phantom studies revealed a comparable spatial resolution for DPET and MCD (5.9 × 6.3 × 4.2 mm vs. 5.9 × 6.5 × 6.0 mm). System sensitivity of MCD was less compared to DPET (91 cps/Bq/ml/cmF0V vs. 231 cps/ Bq/ml/cmFOv). At a lesion-to-background ratio of 4:1, DPET depicted a minimal phantom lesion of 1.0 cm in diameter, MCD a minimal lesion of 1.6 cm. With DPET, a total of 91 lesions in 27 patients were classified as malignant. MCD without knowledge of DPET results revealed increased FDG uptake in all patients with positive DPET findings. MCD detected 72 out of 91 DPET lesions (79.1 %). With knowledge of the DPET findings, 11 additional lesions were detected (+12%). MCD missed lesions in six patients with relevance for staging in two patients. All lesions with a diameter above 18 mm were detected. Conclusion: MCD FDG imaging yielded results comparable to dedicated PET in most patients. However, a considerable number of small lesions clearly detectable with DPET were not detected by MCD alone. Therefore, MCD cannot yet replace dedicated PET in all oncological FDG studies. Further technical refinement of this new method is needed to improve image quality (e.g. attenuation correction).


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1376-P
Author(s):  
GREGORY P. FORLENZA ◽  
BRUCE BUCKINGHAM ◽  
JENNIFER SHERR ◽  
THOMAS A. PEYSER ◽  
JOON BOK LEE ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1066-P
Author(s):  
HALIS K. AKTURK ◽  
DOMINIQUE A. GIORDANO ◽  
HAL JOSEPH ◽  
SATISH K. GARG ◽  
JANET K. SNELL-BERGEON

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document