Off-Label Use of Medicines in Children Attending a Secondary Healthcare Facility in Federal Capital Territory

Before a new drug is approved for marketing in any country, it must have undergone three phases of clinical trials designed to assess its efficacy and safety when used according to an approved recommendation. After a drug has been tested and approved by the regulatory authorities, the drug is usually given a ‘label’ or ‘license’ which is a report describing the drug intended use and dosage. This study aimed at evaluating the use of medicines outside the terms stated in the label. The study was conducted using a data collection form to obtain information from patients’ case file. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The case notes of 449 patients were included in the study. The ages of the patients ranged from 4 days to 16 years. Females constituted 51.7% (232) and males 48.3% (217). A total of 1866 drugs were administered to patients, of which 469 (25.13%) were off-label prescriptions. The highest category of off-label drug was indication (45%). This study has revealed a considerable prevalence of off-label use of medicines, there is however need for proper pharmaceutical care to be emplaced in healthcare facilities so as to minimize off-label drug use and prevent adverse effect of drugs as a result of inappropriate use of medicines.

Switzerland’s Narcotics Regulation Jungle: Off-Label Use, Counterfoil Prescriptions, and Opioid Agonist Therapy in the French-Speaking Cantons

The word “narcotic” is often first associated with “illicit drugs”. Yet, many “narcotic” and psychotropic substances are, in fact, medicines. Controlled medicines (CM) are products that meet the legal definition of both a “narcotic” under the Swiss Narcotics Act and of a medicine under the Therapeutic Products Act. We aim to examine how similar and how different, respectively, the implementation of CM regulations is throughout French-speaking Switzerland. Based on a legal analysis of the cantonal regulations, we conducted semi-structured interviews with cantonal pharmacists and cantonal physicians. We asked them how they perceive and implement the federal legal requirements. We find that some of these requirements have fallen into disuse, notably the federal duty to notify off-label use of CM. We observe that counterfoil prescriptions in their current paper format are a veritable data graveyard in the sense that they are not actively used to monitor or supervise the market. Moreover, we detect different conditions for opioid agonist treatment authorization. Some cantons require additional physicians’ training or written commitments by the person treated. Our mapping of the CM regulation implementation can serve as a basis for cantons to review their practices.

Pharmacovigilance Data as a Trigger to Identify Antimicrobial Resistance and Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics: A Study Using Reports from The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre

(1) Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires urgent multidisciplinary solutions, and pharmacovigilance has the potential to strengthen current antimicrobial stewardship strategies. This study aimed to characterize AMR-relevant adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports submitted to The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre; (2) Methods: We carried out a descriptive analysis of ADR reports submitted to Lareb, coded with AMR-relevant MedDRA Preferred Terms (PTs); (3) Results: Between 1998 and January 2019, 252 AMR-relevant ADR reports were submitted to Lareb. The most frequent antibiotics were tobramycin (n = 89; 35%), colistin (n = 30; 11.9%), cipro-floxacin (n = 16; 6.3%), doxycycline (n = 14; 5.5%), and aztreonam (n = 12; 4.8%). The PTs used included off label use (n = 91; 36.1%), drug ineffective (n = 71; 28.2%), product use in unapproved indication (n = 28; 11.1%), pathogen resistance (n = 14; 5.6%), and drug resistance (n = 13; 5.2%). 54% of the reports were on Watch antibiotics and 19% were involved in the Reserve group. In the Watch group, “off label use” and “product use in unapproved indication” were the most frequent PTs and the majority of reports on Reserve antibiotics were coded as “Off label”. A sharp increase in the number of reports was observed in the three consecutive years with 21 in 2013, 54 in 2014, and 83 in 2015; (4) Conclusions: In addition to existing AMR monitoring strategies, pharmacovigilance databases can serve as a source of data on suspected resistance and inappropriate use. Future research should explore how these AMR-relevant MedDRA Terms are used in resource-limited settings with less capacity to generate laboratory-confirmed resistance data.

PEDT-9 A study of NovoTTF-100A to expand the regulatory indication for childhood glioblastoma through a pediatric clinical trial based on the Advanced Medical Care system

Background: Tumor-treating fields (TTF) are alternating electric fields applied continuously to the brain by attaching 2-pair arrays on the scalp. Although TTF therapy has demonstrated efficacy against supratentorial glioblastoma (GBM) in adults, its safety and efficacy in children have not been confirmed. In Japan, off-label use of medical devices is almost impossible because the national health insurance system does not cover the cost of off-label use of drugs and medical devices. Therefore, TTF therapy cannot be applied to the treatment of pediatric GBM. [Objectives] The investigator-initiated clinical trial aims to expand regulatory approval of TTF therapy for pediatric GBM treatment based on safety and exploratory efficacy data. Methods: Patients aging between 5 and 17 years with histopathological diagnosis of GBM (either newly diagnosed or first-recurrence), which located in the supratentorial region would be included. All the patients will receive TTF therapy for 28 days per course for up to 26 courses until the end-of-therapy criteria are met. The primary endpoint is the adverse event rate with causality. The secondary endpoints include various time-to-event measures and QoL. In total ten patients will be enrolled. Current Status: Discussions with the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) led to a tentative consensus that the accumulated data on the efficacy of NovoTTF-100A for adult GBM may be extrapolatable to pediatric GBM if the trial is able to demonstrate efficacy equivalent to that found in previous, adult studies. On the other hand, the combination of the pediatric safety data gathered in this trial and the findings of international studies, including clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance studies, may expedite approval of the device for pediatric GBM treatment. The trial started patient enrollment in April, 2021 with the supervision of the Advanced Medical Care administration system and is currently awaiting the first eligible patient.