Closed-Loop System Improves Glucose Control

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 42-43
Author(s):  
MIRIAM E. TUCKER
Author(s):  
Martin de Bock ◽  
Anirban Roy ◽  
Julie Dart ◽  
Barry Keenan ◽  
Elizabeth Davis ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0243465
Author(s):  
Anna Laura Herzog ◽  
Jonas Busch ◽  
Christoph Wanner ◽  
Holger K. von Jouanne-Diedrich

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves treatment with lower blood glucose levels and less patient effort. In combination with continuous insulin application, glycemic control improves and hypoglycemic episodes should decrease. Direct feedback of CGM to continuous subcutaneous insulin application, using an algorithm is called a closed-loop (CL) artificial pancreas system. Commercial devices stop insulin application by predicting hypoglycemic blood glucose levels through direct interaction between the sensor and pump. The prediction is usually made for about 30 minutes and insulin delivery is restarted at the previous level if a rise in blood glucose is predicted within the next 30 minutes (hybrid closed loop system, HCL this is known as a predictive low glucose suspend system (PLGS)). In a fully CL system, sensor and pump communicate permanently with each other. Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems, which require the user to estimate the meal size and provide a meal insulin basis, are commercially available in Germany at the moment. These systems result in fewer hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic episodes with improved glucose control. Open source initiatives have provided support by building do-it-yourself CL (DIYCL) devices for automated insulin application since 2014, and are used by a tech-savvy subgroup of patients. The first commercial hybrid CL system has been available in Germany since September 2019. We surveyed 1054 patients to determine which devices are currently used, which features would be in demand by potential users, and the benefits of DIYCL systems. 9.7% of these used a DIYCL system, while 50% would most likely trust these systems but more than 85% of the patients would use a commercial closed loop system, if available. The DIYCL users had a better glucose control regarding their time in range (TIR) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 499-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa H. Lee ◽  
Sara Vogrin ◽  
Barbora Paldus ◽  
Hannah M. Jones ◽  
Varuni Obeyesekere ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Petrovski ◽  
Fawziya Al Khalaf ◽  
Judith Campbell ◽  
Khalid Hussain ◽  
Hannah Fisher ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbora Paldus ◽  
Melissa H. Lee ◽  
Hannah M. Jones ◽  
Sybil A. McAuley ◽  
Jodie C. Horsburgh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1521-1546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayhan A Lal ◽  
Laya Ekhlaspour ◽  
Korey Hood ◽  
Bruce Buckingham

Abstract Recent, rapid changes in the treatment of type 1 diabetes have allowed for commercialization of an “artificial pancreas” that is better described as a closed-loop controller of insulin delivery. This review presents the current state of closed-loop control systems and expected future developments with a discussion of the human factor issues in allowing automation of glucose control. The goal of these systems is to minimize or prevent both short-term and long-term complications from diabetes and to decrease the daily burden of managing diabetes. The closed-loop systems are generally very effective and safe at night, have allowed for improved sleep, and have decreased the burden of diabetes management overnight. However, there are still significant barriers to achieving excellent daytime glucose control while simultaneously decreasing the burden of daytime diabetes management. These systems use a subcutaneous continuous glucose sensor, an algorithm that accounts for the current glucose and rate of change of the glucose, and the amount of insulin that has already been delivered to safely deliver insulin to control hyperglycemia, while minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia. The future challenge will be to allow for full closed-loop control with minimal burden on the patient during the day, alleviating meal announcements, carbohydrate counting, alerts, and maintenance. The human factors involved with interfacing with a closed-loop system and allowing the system to take control of diabetes management are significant. It is important to find a balance between enthusiasm and realistic expectations and experiences with the closed-loop system.


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 234-OR
Author(s):  
MELISSA H. LEE ◽  
SARA VOGRIN ◽  
BARBORA PALDUS ◽  
DALE MORRISON ◽  
DESSI ZAHARIEVA ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 986-P
Author(s):  
BARBORA PALDUS ◽  
MELISSA H. LEE ◽  
HANNAH JONES ◽  
SYBIL A. MCAULEY ◽  
JODIE C. HORSBURGH ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document