Time Domain Reflectometry as an Alternative in Solute Transport Studies

Soil Research ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Vogeler ◽  
S. Green ◽  
A. Nadler ◽  
C. Duwig

Time domain reflectometry (TDR) was used to monitor the transport of conservative tracers in the field under transient water flow in a controlled experiment under a kiwifruit vine. A mixed pulse of chloride and bromide was applied to the soil surface of a 16 m2 plot that had been isolated from the surrounding orchard soil. The movement of this solute pulse was monitored by TDR. A total of 63 TDR probes were installed into the plot for daily measurements of both the volumetric water content (θ) and the bulk soil electrical conductivity (σa). These TDR-measured σa were converted into pore water electrical conductivities (σw) and solute concentrations using various θ–σa–σw relationships that were established in the laboratory on repacked soil. The depth-wise field TDR measurements were compared with destructive measurement of the solute concentrations at the end of the experiment. These results were also compared with predictions using a deterministic model of water and solute transport based on Richards’ equation, and the convection–dispersion equation. TDR was found to give a good indication of the shape of the solute profile with depth, but the concentration of solute was under- or over-estimated by up to 50%, depending on the θ–σa–σw relationships used. Thus TDR can be used to monitor in situ transport of contaminants. However, only rough estimates of the electrical conductivity of the soil solution can so far be obtained by TDR.


2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris Vogeler ◽  
Céline Duwig ◽  
Brent E. Clothier ◽  
Steven R. Green

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Persson

During recent years, time domain reflectometry (TDR) has proved to be a valuable tool for both water content (θ) and bulk electrical conductivity (σa) measurements. To allow resident solute concentration (Cr) measurements, a calibration procedure is necessary for the relationship between σa and Cr. Two main calibration approaches exist. Direct calibration allows for Cr measurements with varying θ, while the indirect calibration method is used for conditions with constant θ. In this paper, three methods of achieving direct calibration parameters are presented and evaluated in three different soil types. Calibrations are made in both disturbed and undisturbed soil columns as well as in the field. It was shown that there were only small differences between calibration methods in homogeneous sand. In other soils, choosing the correct calibration is important. In clay soils solute transport measurements are difficult to take under conditions with varying θ, therefore it is suggested that only the indirect calibration approach should be used. When using TDR it is important to be aware of the accuracy of the TDR system in order to interpret data correctly. Some error sources are thus also briefly discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document