scholarly journals Natural History of Thyroid Function Tests over 5 Years in a Large Pediatric Cohort

2009 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 1678-1682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liora Lazar ◽  
Rachel Ben-David Frumkin ◽  
Erez Battat ◽  
Yael Lebenthal ◽  
Moshe Phillip ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e231337
Author(s):  
Michael S Lundin ◽  
Ahmad Alratroot ◽  
Fawzi Abu Rous ◽  
Saleh Aldasouqi

A 69-year-old woman with a remote history of Graves’ disease treated with radioactive iodine ablation, who was maintained on a stable dose of levothyroxine for 15 years, presented with abnormal and fluctuating thyroid function tests which were confusing. After extensive evaluation, no diagnosis could be made, and it became difficult to optimise the levothyroxine dose, until we became aware of the recently recognised biotin-induced lab interference. It was then noticed that her medication list included biotin 10 mg two times per day. After holding the biotin and repeating the thyroid function tests, the labs made more sense, and the patient was easily made euthyroid with appropriate dose adjustment. We also investigated our own laboratory, and identified the thyroid labs that are performed with biotin-containing assays and developed strategies to increase the awareness about this lab artefact in our clinics.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asami Hotta ◽  
Tomohiro Tanaka ◽  
Haruka Kato ◽  
Shota Kakoi ◽  
Yuki Shimizu ◽  
...  

We report of a case of Graves’ ophthalmopathy presented solely with symptoms of the eyes with normal thyroid function tests and negative immunoreactive TSH receptor autoantibody. 40-year-old male was referred to our hospital due to 2-month history of ocular focusing deficit without any signs or symptoms of hyper- or hypothyroidism. Serum thyroid function tests and 99mTc uptake were both within the normal range. Anti-thyroid autoantibodies were all negative except for the cell-based assay for serum TSH receptor stimulating activity. Since orbital CT scan and MRI gave typical results compatible with Graves’ ophthalmopathy, we treated the patients with corticosteroid pulse therapy and orbital radiation therapy, leading to a partial improvement of the symptoms. This case gives insights into the potential pathophysiologic mechanism underlying Graves’ ophthalmopathy and casts light upon the difficulties of establishing the diagnosis in a euthyroid case with minimal positive results for anti-thyroid autoantibodies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Pedro ◽  
Vanessa Gorito ◽  
Cristina Ferreras ◽  
Ferreira João Silva Maria ◽  
Sofia Ferreira ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Impaired sensitivity to thyroid hormone refers to any process that negatively affects its action, including defects in its transport, metabolism and action on the receptor. Resistance to thyroid hormone due to beta-receptor mutations (RTH-beta) is the most common form of this entity and is characterized by reduced response of peripheral tissues to the action of thyroid hormone. The genetic variability of cofactors involved in the action of thyroid hormone explains the heterogeneity of resistance among affected individuals. Generally, patients with this disorder, have increased levels of free T4 and free T3 in association with normal or high TSH. Clinical case: 11-year-old boy, with personal history of Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A pediatric endocrinology consultation was requested to evaluate abnormalities in his thyroid function tests. A few months earlier, his father was referred to endocrinology consultation because of thyroid function tests abnormalities: TSH - 3.01 μIU / mL (N: 0.35 - 4.94); Free T4 1.7 ng / dL (N: 0.7-1.48); Free T3 4.77 pg / mL (N: 1.71-3.71). Initially, two diagnostic hypotheses were considered: central hyperthyroidism or impaired sensitivity to thyroid hormone. The adult underwent pituitary magnetic resonance, which raised the hypothesis of a pituitary microadenoma, and TRH stimulation test, whose result was strongly suggestive of the second diagnostic possibility. A genetic study was requested and the presence of the c700 G> A variant (p. Ala 324 trh) in the THRB gene was identified, which confirmed the most likely hypothesis. At the time of the pediatric endocrinology consultation, the 11-year-old boy had the results of his lab tests: TSH - 6.67 μIU / mL (N: 0.35 - 5); T4L 2.27 ng / dL (N: 0.88-1.58); T3L 7.79 pg / mL (N: 2-4.20). Given his perfect height and weight evolution and the absence of symptoms suggestive of hypo or hyperthyroidism, it was decided not to start any medication, keeping only periodic surveillance. Conclusion: This case exemplifies unusual thyroid function tests. This discordance between serum thyroid hormone and TSH concentrations should raise the possibility of impaired sensitivity to thyroid hormone. In this condition, patients may present with symptoms of hypo or hyperthyroidism and the etiology of thyroid function tests abnormalities are not easily recognized. This can lead to misdiagnosis and consequently unnecessary treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Daneault Peloquin ◽  
Matthieu St-Jean

Abstract Clinical vignette ENDOCRINE SOCIETY 2020 Title: A case of T3 thyrotoxicosis induced by a dietary supplement. A 24 yo man consulted for a 2 weeks history of diaphoresis, fatigue, insomnia, palpitations and headache associated with a 20 pounds lost. The patient didn’t have a goiter or any signs of orbitopathy. The results revealed a free T3 level of 45.8 pmol/L upon arrival (normal (N) 3.4- 6.8 pmol/L), free T4 level of 6.4 pmol/L (N 11.0–22.0 pmol/L) and TSH level less than 0.005 mUI/L (N: 0.35 to 3.50 mUI/L). Facing those results, a complete review of the patient medication and natural product consumption was done. The patient revealed that he was using, since a month, a vegetable extracts nutritional supplement that didn’t included iodine. He was asked to stop the nutritional supplement and propranolol 10 mg twice daily was prescribed. Thyroid function tests were done 3 days after. The results demonstrate a fT3 level of 4.6 pmol/L, a fT4 level of 5.6 pmol/L and a TSH that still suppressed. A thyroid scintigraphy was performed 7 days later and showed a homogeneous uptake of 18.5% (N 7.0% – 35.0%). We saw the patient 2 weeks later and we ordered another thyroid function test with TSH receptor antibodies, TPO antibodies and thyroglobulin. The results were the following: fT3 of 5.1 pmol/L, fT4 of 12.1 pmol/L, TSH of 2.31 mUI/L, thyroglobulin of 19.8 ug/L (N: 1.4 – 78) and normal levels of antibodies against TPO and TSH receptors. To confirm the contamination of the nutritional supplement by fT3 we used a plasma pool of normal patients in which we measured thyroid function tests at baseline and after we have added the nutritional supplement powder to reflect the dose suggested by the manufacturer. The results showed that fT3 level increased by 36.5%, fT4 by 11.2% and TSH didn’t changed. The powder was then analyzed by an external laboratory that wasn’t able to demonstrate the presence of fT3 nor fT4. The two diagnostic possibility facing those results were that the powder induced an interference with immunoassay used to measure fT3 and fT4 but not TSH or thyrotoxicosis induced by the nutritional supplement with limitation in the technique that tried to identify fT3 in the powder. Given the presentation of the patient, we are convinced that this case represents a thyrotoxicosis induced by a nutritional supplement. In conclusion, Graves’ disease is responsible for 60–80% of the cases of hyperthyroidism. However, there are few cases reports of thyrotoxicosis induced by nutritional supplement1,2, but some studies demonstrate the presence of thyroid hormone in significant amounts in some commercially available health supplements3. This case highlights the importance of verifying exposition to medications and natural products when confronted to cases of thyrotoxicosis. 1.Regina A et al. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 2. Panikkath R et al. Am J Ther. 2014 3. Kang GY et al. Thyroid. 2013


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Eapen ◽  
Hooman Oktaei

Abstract Introduction: Thyroid conditions are among the most common endocrine disorders. Diagnosis is dependent on interpretation of laboratory tests. The challenge comes when the clinical picture is discordant with laboratory results. Case Report: Patient is a 53-year-old male with history of cardiac transplantation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, history of amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism. He was noted to have labs indicative of hyperthyroidism, while taking amiodarone, in 2016-2017, which was treated with methimazole. He was then noted to have abnormal thyroid function tests with low TSH to 0.3 IU/L, normal T3 and normal T4 levels. Thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin had been checked multiple times, and was normal, which is inconsistent with Graves’ disease. Prior radioactive iodine uptake scan, while off amiodarone, was noted to be normal. He was also scheduled for thyroidectomy at another hospital, which was cancelled due to normalization of thyroid function tests. Consultation was received for suppressed TSH to 0.323 IU/L, without symptoms of hyperthyroidism. He had been taking biotin during this time, which he subsequently stopped taking. Repeat TSH following discontinuation of biotin, was within normal range, most recent TSH 2.48 IU/L, free T4 1.03 ng/dL, free T3 2.7 pg/mL. Discussion: Thyroid function tests are commonly ordered. Interpretation of these tests relies on the provider’s understanding of thyroid physiology in addition to interferences with medications and other conditions. High doses of biotin, which people take as supplements for multiple sclerosis, or metabolic disorders, or for healthy nails and hair, can cause thyroid function test abnormalities. Streptavidin and biotin are used in some immunoassay platforms to capture antigens (TSH, free T4) or antibodies. High levels of serum biotin can inhibit the formation of T4 antibody complex, which results in a falsely high free T4 result. Conclusion: Thyroid Function tests should be interpreted very cautiously, especially in the setting of discordant clinical findings. Prior to ordering these tests, should attempt to obtain a detailed history of medications including over-the-counter supplements, which are commonly not reported during medication history. References:Elston, Marianne S., et al. “Factitious Graves’ Disease Due to Biotin Immunoassay Interference—A Case and Review of the Literature.” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 101, no. 9, 30 June 2016, pp. 3251-3255., doi:10.1210/jc.2016-1971. Koehler, Viktoria F., et al. “Fake News? Biotin Interference in Thyroid Immunoassays.” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 484, 30 May 2018, pp. 320-322., doi:10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.053. Soh, Shui-Boon, and Tar-Choon Aw. “Laboratory Testing in Thyroid Conditions - Pitfalls and Clinical Utility.” Annals of Laboratory Medicine, vol. 39, no. 1, 13 Jan. 2019, pp. 3-14., doi:10.3343/alm.2019.39.1.3.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catriona Hilton ◽  
Farhan Ahmed ◽  
Asif Ali

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document