Aggressive resource defense spans from the transient monopolization of a resource up to the long-term maintenance of a territory. While such interference competition is common in nectar-feeding birds, reports in nectar-feeding bats are rare. Glossophaga bats have been observed to temporarily defend flowers but the extent of this monopolization, its effects on nectar intake, and underlying sexual differences remain unknown. We investigated resource defense behavior of Glossophaga mutica in the laboratory. We presented bats with two patches of computer-controlled artificial flowers and tracked individual nectar intake. Furthermore, we established an automated method for detecting aggressive interactions at the artificial flowers. Theoretical models of interference competition predict more aggressive interactions when resources are spatially more clumped. To test this, we varied resource distribution across two patches from clumped to distributed and monitored bats' interactions in one male, one female, and four mixed-sex groups. Males engaged in aggressive interactions more often than females and in each group some individuals defended clumped artificial flowers against others. Subordinate males experienced a substantial decrease in nectar intake, while females were only marginally affected by male aggression. These results suggest that aggressive interactions and their effect on nectar intake are sex-dependent in G. mutica. Furthermore, aggressive interactions were more frequent and resource defense was only successful when resources were clumped. Our experimental set-up allowed us to perform an automated test of models of interference competition with a mammal under controlled laboratory conditions. This approach may pave the way for similar studies with other animals.
Sex-dependent resource defense in a nectar-feeding bat
