A Comparison Between the Accumulated Oxygen Deficit and Anaerobic Work Capacity during Constant-load and All-out Tests

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Daniel Muniz Pumares ◽  
Charles Pedlar ◽  
Richard Godfrey ◽  
Mark Glaister
2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwan Leclair ◽  
Benoit Borel ◽  
Delphine Thevenet ◽  
Georges Baquet ◽  
Patrick Mucci ◽  
...  

This study first aimed to compare critical power (CP) and anaerobic work capacity (AWC), to laboratory standard evaluation methods such as maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) and maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD). Secondly, this study compared child and adult CP and AWC values. Subjects performed a maximal graded test to determine V̇O2max and maximal aerobic power (MAP); and four constant load exercises. In children, CP (W.kg−1) was related to V̇O2max (ml.kg−1.min−1; r = .68; p = .004). AWC (J.kg−1) in children was related to MAOD (r = .58; p = .018). Children presented lower AWC (J.kg−1; p = .001) than adults, but similar CP (%MAP) values. CP (%MAP and W.kg−1) and AWC (J.kg−1) were significantly related to laboratory standard evaluation methods but low correlation indicated that they cannot be used interchangeably. CP (%MAP) was similar in children and adults, but AWC (J.kg−1) was significantly lower in children. These conclusions support existing knowledge related to child-adults characteristics.


Proceedings ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phoebe Bickford ◽  
Vijay Sarthy M. Sreedhara ◽  
Gregory M. Mocko ◽  
Ardalan Vahidi ◽  
Randolph E. Hutchison

1998 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. H. V. van der Woude ◽  
W. H. Bakker ◽  
J. W. Elkhuizen ◽  
H. E. J. Veeger ◽  
T. Gwinn

2005 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dekerle ◽  
G. Brickley ◽  
A. J. P. Hammond ◽  
J. S. M. Pringle ◽  
H. Carter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document