Forecasting in the Presence of Instabilities: How We Know Whether Models Predict Well and How to Improve Them

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1135-1190
Author(s):  
Barbara Rossi

This article provides guidance on how to evaluate and improve the forecasting ability of models in the presence of instabilities, which are widespread in economic time series. Empirically relevant examples include predicting the financial crisis of 2007–08, as well as, more broadly, fluctuations in asset prices, exchange rates, output growth, and inflation. In the context of unstable environments, I discuss how to assess models’ forecasting ability; how to robustify models’ estimation; and how to correctly report measures of forecast uncertainty. Importantly, and perhaps surprisingly, breaks in models’ parameters are neither necessary nor sufficient to generate time variation in models’ forecasting performance: thus, one should not test for breaks in models’ parameters, but rather evaluate their forecasting ability in a robust way. In addition, local measures of models’ forecasting performance are more appropriate than traditional, average measures. (JEL C51, C53, E31, E32, E37, F37)

Author(s):  
Mohd Tahir Ismail ◽  
Zaidi Isa

Many financial and economic time series undergo episodes where the behaviour of the series seems to change quite dramatically. Such phenomena’s are referred to as regime shifts and cannot be modelled by a single equation linear model. Therefore to overcome this problem a nonlinear time series model is typically designed to accommodate this nonlinear feature in the data. In this paper, we use a univariate 2-regime Markov switching autoregressive model (MSAR) to capture regime shifts behaviour in both the mean and the variance in Malaysia ringgit exchange rates against four other countries namely the British pound sterling, the Australian dollar, the Singapore dollar and the Japanese yen between 1990 and 2005. The MS-AR model is found to successfully capture the timing of regime shifts in the four series and this regime shifts occurred because of financial crises such as the European financial crisis in 1992 and the Asian financial crisis in 1997. Furthermore, the significant result of the likelihood ratio test (LR test) justified the used of nonlinear MS-AR model rather than linear AR model.


1987 ◽  
Vol 82 (400) ◽  
pp. 1064-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C. Hillmer ◽  
Abdelwahed Trabelsi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document