scholarly journals Effect of Treatment with Twin-Block Appliances on Body Posture in Class II Malocclusion Subjects: A Prospective Clinical Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 343-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalia Smailienė ◽  
Aistė Intienė ◽  
Irma Dobradziejutė ◽  
Gintaras Kušleika
Author(s):  
N.D. Pilipenko ◽  
S.Yu Maksyukov

This study is dedicated to a comparative analysis of effectiveness of using orthodontic appliances when treating class II malocclusion in children and adolescents. It was shown that treatment with the Invisalign system with a change of the lower jaw position is the most effective method for correcting class II malocclusion in growing patients. Using Invisalign aligners showed not only the best efficacy according to teleroentgenograms. but also made the treatment process comfortable for patients at all its stages. Moreover, higher level of compliance was demonstrated with treatment using the Invisalign system compared to the Twin-block appliance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Ahmed K. Afify ◽  
Amr E. El-Dakroury ◽  
Sherif A. El-Kordy ◽  
Mostafa M. El-Dawlatly

Objective: The aim of the present randomized clinical study was to evaluate the distalization and intrusion effect of an Infra-zygomatic mini-screws supported appliance and compare it with high pull headgear appliance in treatment of growing patients with class II malocclusion. Methodology: 22 growing boys aged between (10 to 12 years) with class II div 1 malocclusion randomly divided to 2 equal groups. The first group treated with high pull headgear with acrylic splint and the second one treated with an Infra-zygomatic mini-screws supported appliance. The treatment duration was 8 months for both groups. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after the treatment for each patient to be analyzed. Results: The maxillary first molar distalization was 2.58±2.31 mm in head gear group and 1.53±2.83 mm in mini-screws group. There was no significant maxillary first molar intrusion in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions: the mini-screws supported appliance can be used as the fixed replacement of the removable high pull headgear appliance with no need for patient cooperation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Huanca Ghislanzoni ◽  
Sofian Ameur ◽  
Gregory S Antonarakis ◽  
Stavros Kiliaridis

Summary Objective To accurately describe compliance in headgear wearing time by using a temperature- and force-sensitive device over an 8 month period of use in a prospective clinical manner. Materials and methods Twenty children with Class II malocclusion aged 8–12 years were randomly selected for treatment with cervical headgear. The headgears were equipped with an electronic module, which measured temperature and force, and patients were instructed to wear the headgear 12 hours daily. The recorded values were analysed to determine the number of days the headgear was used, the number of hours per day it was worn, and the percentage of compliance (100 per cent corresponding to 12 hours daily). Results The average treatment period was 8.4 months with 5.8 months of effective use. When effectively used, headgear was worn 8.7 hours a day (compliance of 73 per cent). Including days where it was not worn, compliance was 6.4 hours (54 per cent). The appliance was used on average 0.5 hours during the day (8 am–8 pm) and 5.9 hours during the night (8 pm–8 am). Very low compliance was recorded during July and August. Conclusion The average compliance with cervical headgear use was 54 per cent of the 12 hour prescription. The headgear was effectively used only 5.8 months over the study period, with roughly 30 per cent of no use. Headgear was used almost exclusively during evening and night-time. During the summer period, compliance was particularly poor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inmaculada Entrenas ◽  
Elena González‐Chamorro ◽  
Covadonga Álvarez‐Abad ◽  
Juan Muriel ◽  
Iván Menéndez‐Díaz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S Ajami ◽  
A Morovvat ◽  
B Khademi ◽  
D Jafarpour ◽  
N Babanouri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document