scholarly journals ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ, ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΩΝ ΣΤΡΩΜΑΤΟΤΥΠΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΝ ΑΠΟΛΥΤΩΝ ΟΡΙΩΝ. ΠΡΟΣΦΑΤΕΣ ΑΝΑΟΕΩΡΗΣΕΙΣ ΤΗΣ ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΗΣ ΧΡΟΝΙΚΗΣ ΚΛΙΜΑΚΑΣ

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Μ. Δ. Δερμιτζάκης
Keyword(s):  
Time Scale ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Quality Of Data ◽  
Geological Time ◽  
Geological Time Scale ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Science Community ◽  
University Of Oslo ◽  
The University

In the last 150 years, the limits of the so called "formal" geochronological/ chronostratigraphical units were determined by several rock researchers using geohistorical events in several ways. The lack of standardisation made them useless for a global scale correlation. During the last two decades, the development of the field and laboratories techniques, the studies of radiogenic and stable isotopes, the improved evaluation of fossil files, the evaluation of paleomagnetic data and the application of cyclostratigraphy, improved the quality of data and contributed to the creation of the most upto-date International Chronostratigraphic Scale, including new subdivisions and determination of the boundaries of geological periods. The compiled New Geological Time Scale GTS 2004 integrates the most recent results of these new methods and was constructed by the International Union of Stratigraphy (ICS), in 2004, presiding F.M. Gradstein, from the University of Oslo, along with 38 other specialists. The new revised Geological Scale encompasses selected new methods that provide the most reliable information. The last Geological Time Scale incorporates important changes and is based on the application of the Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP). Almost 50 GSSP have been defined up to now. Despite the enormous efforts for the construction of the most complete Geological Time Scale, a modified version needs the support and consent of the entire geological science community.

Neogene and Quaternary coexisting in the geological time scale: The inclusive compromise

2009 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian McGowran ◽  
Bill Berggren ◽  
Frits Hilgen ◽  
Fritz Steininger ◽  
Marie-Pierre Aubry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Scale ◽  
Geological Time ◽  
Geological Time Scale

scholarly journals The origins of modern biodiversity on land

2010 ◽  
Vol 365 (1558) ◽  
pp. 3667-3679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Benton
Keyword(s):  
Regional Scale ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Time Range ◽  
Geological Time ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Evolution Of Life ◽  
History Of ◽  
Extinction Events ◽  
Mass Extinction Events

Comparative studies of large phylogenies of living and extinct groups have shown that most biodiversity arises from a small number of highly species-rich clades. To understand biodiversity, it is important to examine the history of these clades on geological time scales. This is part of a distinct ‘phylogenetic expansion’ view of macroevolution, and contrasts with the alternative, non-phylogenetic ‘equilibrium’ approach to the history of biodiversity. The latter viewpoint focuses on density-dependent models in which all life is described by a single global-scale model, and a case is made here that this approach may be less successful at representing the shape of the evolution of life than the phylogenetic expansion approach. The terrestrial fossil record is patchy, but is adequate for coarse-scale studies of groups such as vertebrates that possess fossilizable hard parts. New methods in phylogenetic analysis, morphometrics and the study of exceptional biotas allow new approaches. Models for diversity regulation through time range from the entirely biotic to the entirely physical, with many intermediates. Tetrapod diversity has risen as a result of the expansion of ecospace, rather than niche subdivision or regional-scale endemicity resulting from continental break-up. Tetrapod communities on land have been remarkably stable and have changed only when there was a revolution in floras (such as the demise of the Carboniferous coal forests, or the Cretaceous radiation of angiosperms) or following particularly severe mass extinction events, such as that at the end of the Permian.

Biostratigraphy of Paleocene-Eocene deposits of the Ukrainian Carpathians based on planktonic foraminifera

2021 ◽  
Vol 3-4 (185-186) ◽  
pp. 56-64
Author(s):  
Svitlana Hnylko
Keyword(s):  
Benthic Foraminifera ◽  
Time Scale ◽  
Planktonic Foraminifera ◽  
Complete Sequence ◽  
Geological Time ◽  
Geological Time Scale ◽  
The Carpathians ◽  
Geological Maps ◽  
Sponge Spicules

Paleogene deposits are the main reservoir of hydrocarbon resources in the Carpathians and creation of the modern stratigraphic scheme of these deposits is the basis for improving the efficiency of geological search works. The reliable stratification is a necessary precondition for the preparation of geological maps. Stratification of the Paleocene–Eocene sediments is provided by foraminifera, nannoplankton, dinocysts, radiolarians, sponge spicules, palynoflora. Planktonic foraminifera is the main stratigraphic group of the Paleogene fauna. In the predominantly non-calcareous flysch of the Paleocene–Eocene of the Carpathians, mainly agglutinated benthic foraminifera of siliceous composition are developed. Planktonic foraminifera are distributed locally – in calcareous facies. The most complete sequence of Paleocene–Eocene planktonic foraminifera is represented in the Metova Formation (the Vezhany nappe of the Inner Carpathians). The results of own researches of natural sections of sediments distributed within the Magursky, Monastyretsky and Vezhany nappes of the Ukrainian Carpathians together with the analysis of literature sources are used. The article presents a generalized biozonal division of the Paleocene–Eocene of the Ukrainian Carpathians by planktonic foraminifera. On the basis of certain correlation levels, a comparison with the Geological Time Scale was made. The Parvularugoglobigerina eugubina Zone (lowermost Danian), Globoconusa daubjergensis Zone (middle Danian), Praemurica inconstans Zone (upper Danian); Morozovella angulata Zone (lower Selandian); Globanomalina pseudomenardii Zone fnd Acarinina acarinata Zone (upper Selandian–Thanetian); Morozovella subbotinae Zone (lower Ypresian), Morozovella aragonensis Zone (upper Ypresian); Acarinina bullbrooki Zone (lower Lutetian), Acarinina rotundimarginata Zone (upper Lutetian); Hantkenina alabamensis Zone (Bartonian); Globigerinatheka tropicalis Zone (lower Priabonian) and Subbotina corpulenta Zone (upper Priabonian) based on planktonic foraminifera are characterized in studied deposits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document