scholarly journals Public hospitals’ finance management systems, and accountability mechanisms in the context of decentralized health systems in low- and middle-income countries – A thematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Hassan Leli ◽  
Osman Addulahi ◽  
Benjamin Tsofa

Background: Health sector decentralization, defined as the transfer of decision making over health sector resources from a central to a peripheral entity; has been and continues to be a widely adopted health system reforms in many low and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, its reported effects have been varied. Nevertheless, decentralization reforms aimed at providing public hospital management autonomy are increasing in prevalence in many LMICs. The range and form of this autonomy because of these reforms has often produced mixed effects. We set out to understand the range of financial management autonomy that has been granted to public hospitals in decentralized health systems in LMICs, and what forms of accountability arrangements have been used to facilitate this autonomy. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and CINAHL databases for published articles on this subject. We only included articles that reported empirical findings on hospital level financing and financial management in the context of decentralization in LMICs and/or those that included findings on hospital level finance management accountability arrangements. After a systematic search we found four articles that met our inclusion criteria. We undertook a thematic synthesis of the data and narrative reporting of our findings. Results: From the review – we find that decentralization reforms did not result in improved funding flows, finance management autonomy or accountability mechanisms and for public hospitals. These outcomes were irrespective of the mode and form of decentralization reform adopted. Conclusion: From our review, it is evident that though health sector decentralization reforms have been widely promoted and adopted in the past few decades across LMICs, there is minimal evidence that these reforms have improved funding flows to public hospitals, improved financial management autonomy or accountability mechanisms; so as to enhance the performance of these hospitals at sub-national level.

2017 ◽  
pp. jn242321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bireshwar Sinha ◽  
Ranadip Chowdhury ◽  
Ravi Prakash Upadhyay ◽  
Sunita Taneja ◽  
Jose Martines ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-73
Author(s):  
Micheal Kofi Boachie ◽  
Tatjana Põlajeva ◽  
Albert Opoku Frimpong

The issue of whether government health spending improves health outcomes has been a matter of contention over the years. There have been calls for governments to reduce their financing role in the health sector since such funding do not produce better health. This article examines the effect of public (i.e., government) health expenditure on infant mortality, a proxy of health outcomes, in low- and middle-income countries. We use data from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators database and employ fixed effects estimation technique, with three-stage least squares as a robustness check. The data cover the period 1995–2014. We find that public health expenditure improves health outcomes significantly, as it reduces infant mortality. The results further show that rising income and access to safe water are some of the reasons for improved health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. Based on these results and the expected redistributive impact of government spending, governments in low- and middle-income countries may consider increasing health spending for better healthcare systems and improved health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document