أثر إعادة ترتيب بدائل الاستجابة في صعوبة فقرة الاختيار من متعدد = The Effect of Reordering Response Options on the Difficulty Level of Multiple Choice Test Items

Author(s):  
باسل خميس سالم أبو فودة
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-20
Author(s):  
Kartika Pramudita ◽  
R. Rosnawati ◽  
Socheath Mam

The study was aimed at describing five methods of the development of parallel test items of the multiple-choice type in mathematics at Yogyakarta (primary education level). The study was descriptive research involving 22 mathematics teachers as the respondents. Data collection was conducted through interviews and document reviews concerning the developed test packages. A questionnaire was used to gather data about the procedure the teachers employed in developing the tests. Findings show that the teachers used five methods in developing the test item; namely (1) randomizing the item numbers; (2) randomizing the sequences of response options; (3) writing items using the same contexts but different figures; (4) using anchor items; and (5) writing different items based on the same specification table. All of the respondents stated that they developed the table of the specification before developing the test items and that most of them (77%) did the validation of the instruments in content and language.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra L. Clifton ◽  
Cheryl L. Schriner

1988 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rand R. Wilcox ◽  
Karen Thompson Wilcox ◽  
Jacob Chung

1967 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald D. Wynne ◽  
Herbert Gerjuoy ◽  
Harold Schiffman ◽  
Norman Wexler

Normal Ss were given 54 Kent-Rosanoff word-association-test items in one of two different orders; antonym-eliciting items were concentrated either (a) near the beginning or (b) near the end of the list. For each order, testing was administered under three different test conditions: (a) standard free-association instructions, (b) instructions to give the response “most people” would give, and (c) “most people” instructions with a multiple-choice test format. The order starting with antonym-eliciting items elicited more popular antonym responses than did the other order. Popularity-set instructions, particularly with the multiple-choice format, elicited more non-antonym popular responses than did free-association test conditions. With repeated testing, popular antonyms became more frequent. For some sequences of test conditions, there was also an increase in non-antonym popular responses with repeated testing.


2019 ◽  
Vol IV (II) ◽  
pp. 203-210
Author(s):  
Nasreen Akhter ◽  
Ahmad Akhtar Usmani ◽  
Sabiha Iqbal

This study overviews development and validity of a pool of multiple choice test items of geometry part of Mathematics for secondary level. A table of specifications was prepared and a pool of 48 multiple-choice type test items was developed from the test universe. The content validity and face validity of test items was determined with the help of a team of experts. Sample of the study was 488 students of class 10. After determining the validity and reliability through item analysis and quantitative and qualitative analysis of the test, it was concluded that 30 out of 48 items in the test were valid, reliable and suitable for measurement of the learning achievements in the course. Therefore, these items are useful in the boards of examinations for 9th class in Punjab (Pakistan).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document