scholarly journals Teoria Queer e Relações Internacionais: análise da permeabilidade acadêmica de gênero no Brasil | Queer Theory and International Relations: analysis of gender academic permeability in Brazil

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Leonardo Mercher
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Queer Theory ◽  
Social Group ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Post Graduate ◽  
Academic Activism ◽  
Gender Space ◽  
Gender Theories

O presente artigo utiliza-se da teoria queer para investigar a permeabilidade de teorias e temáticas de gênero em Relações Internacionais no Brasil. Para investigá-la, fez-se a análise do grupo social acadêmico de Relações Internacionais: por meio do conteúdo bibliográfico presentes nos editais de seleção de pós-graduação; nos temas tratados pelas teses doutorais, produzidas nos 16 programas de Relações Internacionais e Ciência Política, de 2010 a 2018; e do espaço ao tema na ABRI, ABCP e ISA. Os resultados obtidos indicam baixa permeabilidade de gênero nas Relações Internacionais no Brasil: com baixa presença temática na bibliografia de seleção; ausência de espaço institucionalizado na ABRI, em relação à ABCP e ISA; e número reduzido de teses publicadas no tema, 5 de 405 em Relações Internacionais. O resultado vai de encontro com a percepção do atual ativismo acadêmico do MulheRIs por maior espaço de gênero no grupo social.ABSTRACTThis article uses queer theory to investigate the permeability of gender theories and themes in International Relations in Brazil. To investigate it, the analysis of the academic social group of International Relations was made: through the bibliographic content present in the post-graduate selection papers; in the topics covered by the doctoral theses, produced in the 16 programs of International Relations and Political Science, from 2010 to 2018; and from space to theme at ABRI, ABCP and ISA. The results indicate low permeability of gender in International Relations in Brazil: with low thematic presence in the selection bibliography; absence of institutionalized space in ABRI, in face of ABCP and ISA; and a reduced number of theses published in the theme, 5 of 405 in International Relations. The result agrees with the perception of the current MulheRIs academic activism for gender space in our social group.Palavras-chave: Gênero. Queer. Permeabilidade.Keywords: Gender. Queer. Permeability.Recebido em 28 de Maio de 2018 | Received May 28, 2018Aceito em 27 de Agosto de 2018 | Accepted on August 27, 2018DOI

Teaching About Terrorism

1985 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Michael Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Student Interest ◽  
Science Majors

During the fall 1983 semester, I experimented with a terrorism simulation that seemed to engage student interest and heighten their awareness about the nature of terrorism.I used the simulation in Political Science 221 — Introduction to International Relations. There were two sections of this course, which met three hours weekly for approximately 15 weeks. About half the students were political science majors; most were freshmen and sophomores. For purposes of conducting the simulation, however, it makes little difference what year students are in or what majors they follow. With the exception of a two-week unit on terrorism, the course devoted about one week to each of the standard topics normally studied by students in international relations.

scholarly journals When Capitalists Collide: Business Conflict and the End of Empire in Egypt. By Robert Vitalis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995

1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Kirk Beattie
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Political Science ◽  
University Of California

When Capitalists Collide: Business Conflict and the End of Empire in Egypt. By Robert Vitalis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995. 282 pp. Reviewed by Kirk Beattie, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Simmons College, Boston, MA.

THE FIRST MODERN REALIST: FELIX GILBERT'S MACHIAVELLI AND THE REALIST TRADITION IN INTERNATIONAL THOUGHT

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
NICOLAS GUILHOT
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Political Science ◽  
International Relations Theory ◽  
Security Studies ◽  
Historical Scholarship ◽  
Global Power ◽  
The Us ◽  
New Interpretation ◽  
International Thought

In the disciplines of political science and international relations, Machiavelli is unanimously considered to be “the first modern realist.” This essay argues that the idea of a realist tradition going from the Renaissance to postwar realism founders when one considers the disrepute of Machiavelli among early international relations theorists. It suggests that the transformation of Machiavelli into a realist thinker took place subsequently, when new historical scholarship, informed by strategic and political considerations related to the transformation of the US into a global power, generated a new picture of the Renaissance. Focusing on the work of Felix Gilbert, and in particular hisMachiavelli and Guicciardini, the essay shows how this new interpretation of Machiavelli was shaped by the crisis of the 1930s, the emergence of security studies, and the philanthropic sponsorship of international relations theory.

scholarly journals The Communication of Ideas across Subfields in Political Science

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (02) ◽  
pp. 468-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin R. Graham ◽  
Charles R. Shipan ◽  
Craig Volden
Keyword(s):  
Network Analysis ◽  
International Relations ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Comparative Politics ◽  
Diffusion Processes ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Shed Light ◽  
Levels Of Integration

ABSTRACTWhat factors inhibit or facilitate cross-subfield conversations in political science? This article draws on diffusion scholarship to gain insight into cross-subfield communication. Diffusion scholarship represents a case where such communication might be expected, given that similar diffusion processes are analyzed in American politics, comparative politics, and international relations. We identify nearly 800 journal articles published on diffusion within political science between 1958 and 2008. Using network analysis we investigate the degree to which three “common culprits”—terminology, methodological approach, and journal type—influence levels of integration. We find the highest levels of integration among scholars using similar terms to describe diffusion processes, sharing a methodological approach (especially in quantitative scholarship), and publishing in a common set of subfield journals. These findings shed light on when cross-subfield communication is likely to occur with ease and when barriers may prove prohibitive.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document