501 Influence of Welding Residual Stress on Pitting Corrosion in Stainless Steels under Freezing and Thawing Corrosive Environment

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011.50 (0) ◽  
pp. 151-152
Author(s):  
Kazunori ISHITSUKA ◽  
Tuyoshi TAKAHASHI ◽  
Jun-ichi SHIBANO ◽  
Michiaki KOBAYASHI ◽  
Setsuo MIURA
2008 ◽  
Vol 2008.47 (0) ◽  
pp. 49-50
Author(s):  
Kazunori ISHITSUKA ◽  
Tuyoshi TAKAHASHI ◽  
Jun-ichi SHIBANO ◽  
Michiaki KOBAYASHI ◽  
Setsuo MIURA

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (0) ◽  
pp. _G041015-1-_G041015-4
Author(s):  
Kazunori ISHITSUKA ◽  
Tsuyoshi TAKAHASHI ◽  
Junichi SHIBANO ◽  
Setsuo MIURA ◽  
Michiaki KOBAYASHI

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (791) ◽  
pp. 1044-1055
Author(s):  
Kazunori ISHITSUKA ◽  
Tsuyoshi TAKAHASHI ◽  
Jun-ichi SHIBANO ◽  
Setsuo MIURA ◽  
Michiaki KOBAYASHI ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008.1 (0) ◽  
pp. 237-238
Author(s):  
Kazunori ISHITSUKA ◽  
Tuyoshi TAKAHASHI ◽  
Jun-ichi SHIBANO ◽  
Michiaki KOBAYASHI ◽  
Setsuo MIURA

Author(s):  
John E. Broussard

Paragraph IWB-3641 of Section XI [1] permits the use of Nonmandatory Appendix C or H to perform the analytical evaluation of flaws in austenitic and ferritic piping. When considering welded austenitic material, Appendix C does not include the welding residual stress as an input to the calculations for maximum allowable flaw length and depth. In contrast, Appendix H does include the welding residual stress when the K′r coordinate on the failure assessment diagram curve is calculated for austenitic materials. This paper calculates the maximum allowable axial and circumferential flaws in a welded austenitic component subject to internal pressure loads using Appendix C procedures and using Appendix H procedures. The results are compared to investigate cases where a flaw may be acceptable using one set of procedures and not acceptable using the other.


2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (776) ◽  
pp. 660-669
Author(s):  
Kazunori ISHITSUKA ◽  
Tsuyoshi TAKAHASHI ◽  
Jun-ichi SHIBANO ◽  
Setsuo MIURA ◽  
Michiaki KOBAYASHI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document