scholarly journals Biodegradable pin fixation of elbow fractures in children. A randomised trial

1991 ◽  
Vol 73-B (6) ◽  
pp. 965-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
PG Hope ◽  
DM Williamson ◽  
CJ Coates ◽  
WG Cole
1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 419 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. G. Hope ◽  
D. M. Williamson ◽  
C. J. Coates

2004 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 702-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID L. SKAGGS ◽  
MICHAEL W. CLUCK ◽  
AMIR MOSTOFI ◽  
JOHN M. FLYNN ◽  
ROBERT M. KAY

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 706-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mininder S. Kocher ◽  
James R. Kasser ◽  
Peter M. Waters ◽  
Donald Bae ◽  
Brian D. Snyder ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 1177-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wade Shrader ◽  
Mark D. Campbell ◽  
David J. Jacofsky

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Ota ◽  
Soichiro Itoh ◽  
Yoshihiko Matsuyama

Background: We compared the treatment results for displaced mallet finger fractures in children between low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) stimulation and Ishiguro’s method, which involves extension block and arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint with pinning. Methods: Eleven cases (5 females and 6 males; average age, 13.5 years) of mallet finger were operated with Ishiguro’s method, and 8 cases (3 females and 5 males; average age, 13.0 years) were treated with LIPUS stimulation. Lateral radiographs were used to determine the distance of fragment displacement and the percentage of the articular surface involved in the fragments. Functional outcomes in flexion and extension and those estimated using Crawford’s evaluation criteria at the final visits were assessed in each group. Results: The duration needed for fracture healing was longer, however, active extension and flexion of the DIP joint were significantly larger in the LIPUS group compared with those in the pinning group. Functional recovery was excellent in all cases in the LIPUS group; however, recovery was good in 3 cases and excellent in 8 cases in the pinning group. Extension of the DIP joint was significantly larger when pins were removed in 35 or lesser days postoperatively compared with cases in which pin fixation was continued for more than 35 days. Conclusions: LIPUS therapy may be recommended as an option to treat type I mallet finger in children for whom initiation of treatment was delayed up to 8 weeks. When Ishiguro’s method is applied to the displaced mallet fracture in children, arthrodesis of the DIP joint for more than 5 weeks should be avoided to prevent flexion contracture.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 516-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Okubo ◽  
M. Nakasone ◽  
M. Kinjo ◽  
K. Onaka ◽  
C. Futenma ◽  
...  

Purpose Elbow fractures are common in children and occur during daily activities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the epidemiology of paediatric elbow fractures over a two-year period in Okinawa, a southern subtropical island in Japan. Methods This was a retrospective study of 488 elbow fractures in children younger than 15 years old treated at 11 hospitals in Okinawa. Data included age, gender, calendar month, type of fracture, operation rate, mechanism of injury, and aetiology. Results The most frequent age was 6 years old, with 47.5% of all elbow fractures occurring in an age range from 6 to 10 years old. The fracture rate for boys was 1.6 times higher than that for girls. The incidence was the highest in May (56 fractures) and the lowest in August (25 fractures). Supracondylar fractures were the most common type (44%), followed by lateral condyle fractures (22%); 45% of all fractures were treated operatively. Medial epicondyle fractures had the highest rate of operative treatment (91%). In the 6 to 10-year-old group, 19% of all fractures occurred while skateboarding or caster-boarding, the most frequent aetiology. Conclusions Supracondylar fractures are the most common fracture type in 4 to 7-year-old boys. In the 6 to 10-year-old group, skateboarding and caster-boarding are the most frequent and increasing cause of elbow fractures. Therefore, some preventive measures are needed. Level of evidence Level IV, case series


2012 ◽  
Vol 98 (7) ◽  
pp. 808-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Yaokreh ◽  
T.H. Odehouri-Koudou ◽  
S. Tembely ◽  
A.G. Dieth ◽  
D.B. Kouamé ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document