scholarly journals Development and Feasibility ofHealth Mechanics: A Self-Management Program for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Meade ◽  
Brad Trumpower ◽  
Martin Forchheimer ◽  
Lisa DiPonio

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. P. Munce ◽  
Timothy C. Guetterman ◽  
Susan B. Jaglal

In the exploratory sequential design, the qualitative phase occurs first and is followed by the quantitative phase. The methodological purpose of this article is to demonstrate how an exploratory sequential approach, including the use of a joint display, can be used for complex intervention development. This article presents and integrates the qualitative and quantitative findings from a series of previously published studies on the considerations for a tailored self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury. This article serves as a reference for other researchers, clinicians, and/or other stakeholders on using the exploratory sequential design for complex intervention development. The exploratory sequential design should be used more broadly for the development of relevant and sustainable interventions.



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonya Allin ◽  
John Shepherd ◽  
Teri Thorson ◽  
Jennifer Tomasone ◽  
Sarah Munce ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at high risk of experiencing secondary conditions like pressure injuries. Self-management programs may reduce the risk of complications, but traditional programs have proven to be insufficiently tailored to the needs of people with SCI. To overcome barriers to self-management support, a web-based, self-management program was developed for Canadians with SCI called <i>SCI &amp; U</i>. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and potential impact of the <i>SCI &amp; U</i> program in the context of a mixed methods pilot study. METHODS The study followed an explanatory, sequential mixed methods design. Participants (N=11) were Canadians with SCI who had been living in the community for more than 1 year. Each took part in a self-paced, six-session self-management program guided by a trained peer health coach. During sessions, participants could discuss a health topic with their coach from a predefined list (eg, skin or bowel management). Quantitative data were gathered before and after program participation to assess program feasibility and impact. Feasibility measures included attrition rates, frequency of topics selected, and recorded goals, whereas impact measures included measures of self-efficacy (University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale [UW-SES]), mood (Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale [PHQ-8]), secondary conditions (Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale [SCI-SCS]), and resilience (Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Resilience Scale [SCI-QOL-R]). Qualitative measures were based on postintervention interviews; these were designed to confirm and expand on quantitative RESULTS Of the 11 participants, 10 completed pre- and postassessments, and 6 coaching sessions. Sessions lasted between 31 and 81 min (average 55, SD 13), and the duration of the program ranged from 35 to 88 days (average 56, SD 23). Diet and exercise were selected as topics 40% (20/50 sessions with topics) of the time, whereas topics such as mental health, bladder management, pain, and bowel management were chosen less frequently. Results gathered before and after the pilot study demonstrated improvements with moderate effect sizes on the UW-SES and the electronic health literacy scale (ie, Hedges g&gt;0.5). Effect sizes for measures of resilience (SCI-QOL-R), depression (PHQ-8), and secondary conditions (SCI-SCS) were small (ie, Hedges g&gt;0.3). Qualitative results confirmed a common focus on diet and exercise, and defined coaches as sources of accountability, information, reassurance and affirmation, and emotional and technical support. CONCLUSIONS Results demonstrated that a web-based self-management program is feasible and acceptable by Canadians with SCI. Results also indicated a web-based, peer-led self-management program may impact resilience, self-efficacy, mood, and secondary complications. Finally, results illuminated the role of the coach in facilitating behavior change. Future work seeks to validate results in the context of a randomized controlled trial.



10.2196/16351 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e16351
Author(s):  
Sonya Allin ◽  
John Shepherd ◽  
Teri Thorson ◽  
Jennifer Tomasone ◽  
Sarah Munce ◽  
...  

Background Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at high risk of experiencing secondary conditions like pressure injuries. Self-management programs may reduce the risk of complications, but traditional programs have proven to be insufficiently tailored to the needs of people with SCI. To overcome barriers to self-management support, a web-based, self-management program was developed for Canadians with SCI called SCI & U. Objective This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and potential impact of the SCI & U program in the context of a mixed methods pilot study. Methods The study followed an explanatory, sequential mixed methods design. Participants (N=11) were Canadians with SCI who had been living in the community for more than 1 year. Each took part in a self-paced, six-session self-management program guided by a trained peer health coach. During sessions, participants could discuss a health topic with their coach from a predefined list (eg, skin or bowel management). Quantitative data were gathered before and after program participation to assess program feasibility and impact. Feasibility measures included attrition rates, frequency of topics selected, and recorded goals, whereas impact measures included measures of self-efficacy (University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale [UW-SES]), mood (Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale [PHQ-8]), secondary conditions (Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale [SCI-SCS]), and resilience (Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Resilience Scale [SCI-QOL-R]). Qualitative measures were based on postintervention interviews; these were designed to confirm and expand on quantitative Results Of the 11 participants, 10 completed pre- and postassessments, and 6 coaching sessions. Sessions lasted between 31 and 81 min (average 55, SD 13), and the duration of the program ranged from 35 to 88 days (average 56, SD 23). Diet and exercise were selected as topics 40% (20/50 sessions with topics) of the time, whereas topics such as mental health, bladder management, pain, and bowel management were chosen less frequently. Results gathered before and after the pilot study demonstrated improvements with moderate effect sizes on the UW-SES and the electronic health literacy scale (ie, Hedges g>0.5). Effect sizes for measures of resilience (SCI-QOL-R), depression (PHQ-8), and secondary conditions (SCI-SCS) were small (ie, Hedges g>0.3). Qualitative results confirmed a common focus on diet and exercise, and defined coaches as sources of accountability, information, reassurance and affirmation, and emotional and technical support. Conclusions Results demonstrated that a web-based self-management program is feasible and acceptable by Canadians with SCI. Results also indicated a web-based, peer-led self-management program may impact resilience, self-efficacy, mood, and secondary complications. Finally, results illuminated the role of the coach in facilitating behavior change. Future work seeks to validate results in the context of a randomized controlled trial.



2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 7501205070p1
Author(s):  
Carla Wilson Walker ◽  
Mary Holowatuk ◽  
Jessica Dashner




BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e044152
Author(s):  
Mokgadi Kholofelo Mashola ◽  
Elzette Korkie ◽  
Diphale Joyce Mothabeng

IntroductionApproximately 80% of people with spinal cord injury experience clinically significant chronic pain. Pain (whether musculoskeletal or neuropathic) is consistently rated as one of the most difficult problems to manage and negatively affects the individual’s physical, psychological and social functioning and increases the risk of pain medication misuse and poor mental health. The aim of this study is to therefore determine the presence of pain and its impact on functioning and disability as well as to develop a framework for self-management of pain for South African manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.Methods and analysisCommunity-dwelling participants with spinal cord injury will be invited to participate in this three-phase study. Phase 1 will use a quantitative, correlational design to determine factors related to pain such as pectoralis minor length, scapular dyskinesis, wheelchair functioning, physical quality of life, community reintegration and pain medication misuse. Demographic determinants of pain such as age, gender, type of occupation, completeness of injury and neurological level of injury will also be investigated. Participants with pain identified in phase 1 will be invited to partake in a qualitative descriptive and contextually designed phase 2 to explore their lived experience of pain through in-depth interviews. The results of phases 1 and 2 will then be used with the assistance from experts to develop a framework for self-management of pain using a modified Delphi study. Data analysis will include descriptive and inferential statistics (quantitative data) and thematic content analysis (qualitative data).Ethics and disseminationApproval for this study is granted by the Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Pretoria (approval number 125/2018). This study is registered with the South African National Health Research Database (reference GP201806005). This study’s findings will be shared in academic conferences and published in scientific peer-reviewed journals.



2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 7512515334p1
Author(s):  
W. Ben Mortenson ◽  
Gurkaran Singh ◽  
Ethan Simpson ◽  
Megan McGillivray ◽  
Jared Adams ◽  
...  


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1136-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Hirsche ◽  
Beverly Williams ◽  
Allyson Jones ◽  
Patricia Manns


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 529-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary H. Wilde ◽  
James M. McMahon ◽  
Eileen Fairbanks ◽  
Judith Brasch ◽  
Robert Parshall ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document