scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation, Functional Outcome and Complications of MicroEndoscopic Discectomy(MED) in Single or Double Level Lumbar Disc Herniation- A Retrospective Review of 156 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Microendoscopic Discectomy

Introduction: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common causes for low back pain and related disabilities. Surgery is indicated in patients who do not respond to the conservative measures for at least 6 weeks or symptoms are worsened. Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is a well-accepted minimally invasive surgical technique with similar results compared to open surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome, functional improvement and analyze complications during MED. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 156 patients who were operated for single or double level LDH using MED between 2016 and 2018. All patients were evaluated for pain and disability using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI), respectively. Modified MabNab’s criteria used to evaluate overall outcome of surgery. Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), hospital stay and time to return back to previous activities were evaluated. Complications and revisions were noted during follow-up to analyze clinical results. Paired t-test was used to evaluate statistical difference in VAS and ODI score during follow-up. Results: All patients were followed up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter postoperatively. Average follow-up was 25.5±9.7 months and average age was 45.0±12.7 years. Average VAS scores improved significantly from preoperative 8.7±0.8 to 2.0±1.1 postoperatively (p<0.0001). Average preoperative ODI improved significantly from 53.8±6.1 to 22.6±5.1 postoperatively (p<0.0001). Both score were maintained at the final follow-up. The average time to return to previous activity level was 35.7±14.3 days. Average operation time, EBL and hospital stay were 57.6±14.6 minutes, 36.7±13.1 mL and 2.4±0.7 days, respectively. There were total 19 (12.2%) complications and 12 (7.7%) revisions in the series. Overall clinical outcome was excellent, good, fair and poor in 73.1%, 20.5%, 5.1% and 1.3% of cases using modi

Clinical Outcome of Full-endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Single-level Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Minimum of 5-year Follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (20;3) ◽  
pp. E425-E430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Single Level

Background: Full-endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (FEID) is widely applied for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and satisfactory short-term outcomes have been achieved. However, the long-term evaluation for this technique is still lacking, especially the comparison between FEID and microendoscopic discectomy (MED). Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcome of FEID technique in comparison with MED for singlelevel LDH with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Study Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Inpatient surgery center. Methods: A total of 152 patients with single-level LDH located at either L4-L5 or L5-S1 who underwent either FEID or MED from August 2008 to April 2011 at our hospital were enrolled in this study. General parameters including operative time, length of hospital stay, mean time to return to work, complications, and recurrences were recorded. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional assessment, and modified MacNab criteria for patient satisfaction. Results: At the final follow-up, the VAS of leg and back pain decreased from 7.6 ± 1.6 and 3.1 ± 2.2 points preoperatively to 1.6 ± 1.2 and 1.7 ± 0.9 at the final follow-up, respectively (P < 0.05). The ODI score was 69.5% ± 10.5% preoperatively, and declined to 21.8% ± 7.0% at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). VAS, ODI, and modified MacNab criteria of the FEID group were improved compared to the control group though there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Limitations: This was a retrospective study with a relatively small sample size. Additionally, this study contained only clinical outcomes, without long-term radiological outcomes. Conclusions: The application of FEID achieved similar satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes for the surgical treatment of LDH as MED. However, compared with MED, FEID exhibits advantages including less operation time, shorter hospital stay, and faster postoperative recovery. Key words: Lumbar disc herniation, full-endoscopic interlaminar discectomy, microendoscopic disectomy, long-term Pain Physician 2017

scholarly journals Microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for the treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation: report of the surgical technique, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Wang ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Xiaojie Tang ◽  
Haifei Cao ◽  
Qinyong Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The area which located at the medial pedicle, posterior vertebral body and ventral hemilamina is defined as the hidden zone. Surgical management of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation (HZLDH) is technically challenging due to its difficult surgical exposure. The conventional interlaminar approach harbors the potential risk of post-surgical instability, while other approaches consist of complicated procedures with a steep learning curve and prolonged operation time. Objective To introduce microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) technique for treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation and present clinical outcomes. Methods Between Jan 2016 to Jan 2018, twenty one patients (13 males) with HZLDH were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent MELS (19 patients underwent sequestrectomy only, 2 patients underwent an additional inferior discectomy). The nerve root and fragment were visually exposed using MELS. The operation duration, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrences were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative stability was evaluated both radiologically and clinically. Results The mean follow-up period was 20.95 ± 2.09 (18–24) months. The mean operation time was 32.43 ± 7.19 min and the mean blood loss was 25.52 ± 5.37 ml. All patients showed complete neurological symptom relief after surgery. The VAS and ODI score were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to those before operation (7.88 ± 0.70 vs 0.10 ± 0.30, 59.24 ± 10.83 vs 11.29 ± 3.59, respectively, p < 0.05). Seventeen patients (81%) obtained an “excellent” outcome and the remaining four (19%) patients obtained a “good” outcome based the MacNab criteria. One patient suffered reherniation at the same level one year after the initial surgery and underwent a transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. No major complications and postoperative instability were observed. Conclusions Our observation suggest that MELS is safe and effective in the management of HZLDH. Due to its relative simplicity, it comprises a flat surgical learning curve and shorter operation duration, and overall results in reduced disturbance to lumbar stability.

Microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for the treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation: report of the surgical technique, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Wang ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Xiaojie Tang ◽  
Haifei Cao ◽  
Qinyong Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Surgical management of lumbar disc herniation in the hidden zone is technically challenging due to its difficult surgical exposure. The conventional interlaminar approach harbors the potential risk of post-surgical instability, while other approaches consist of complicated procedures with a steep learning curve and prolonged operation time. Objective To introduce a safe and effective technique named microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation and present clinical outcomes within a two year follow-up period. Methods Between Jan 2016 to Jan 2018, twenty one patients (13 males) with hidden zone lumbar disc herniation were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent MELS (19 patients underwent sequestrectomy only, 2 patients underwent an additional inferior discectomy). The nerve root and herniated fragment were visually exposed using this extra-laminar approach. The operation duration, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrences were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative stability was evaluated both radiologically and clinically. Results The mean follow-up period was 20.95 ± 2.09 months, ranging from 18 to 24 months. The mean operation time was 32.43 ± 7.19 min and the mean blood loss was 25.52 ± 5.37 ml. All patients showed complete neurological symptom relief after surgery. The VAS and ODI score were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to those before operation (7.88 ± 0.70 vs 0.10 ± 0.30, 59.24 ± 10.83 vs 11.29 ± 3.59, respectively, p < 0.05). Seventeen patients (81%) obtained an “excellent” outcome and the remaining four (19%) patients obtained a “good” outcome based the MacNab criteria. One patient suffered reherniation at the same level one year after the initial surgery and underwent a transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. No major complications and postoperative instability were observed. Conclusions Our observation suggest that MELS is a safe and effective method in the management of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation. Due to its relative simplicity, it comprises a flat surgical learning curve and shorter operation duration, and overall results in reduced disturbance to lumbar stability.

scholarly journals Learning curve of trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression in herniated lumbar disc disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Son ◽  
Chan Jong Yoo ◽  
Byung Rhae Yoo ◽  
Woo Seok Kim ◽  
Tae Seok Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Late Group

Abstract Background: Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) using slender epiduroscope and a holmium YAG laser is one of the minimally invasive surgical options for lumbar disc herniation. However, the learning curve of SELD and the effect of surgical proficiency on clinical outcome have not yet been established. We investigated patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing SELD to report the clinical outcome and learning curve. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome and learning curve were performed at a single center from clinical data collected from November 2015 to November 2018. A total of 82 patients who underwent single-level SELD for lumbar disc herniation with a minimum follow-up of 6.0 months were enrolled. Based on the findings that the cut-off of familiarity was 20 cases according to the cumulative study of operation time, patients were allocated to two groups: early group (n = 20) and late group (n = 62). The surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated between the two groups to analyze the learning curve of SELD.Results: According to linear and log regression analyses, the operation time was obtained by the formula: operation time = 58.825 - (0.181 × [case number]) (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly different between the two groups (mean 56.95 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.12–64.78 in the early group versus mean 45.34 minutes; 95% CI, 42.45–48.22 in the late group; p = 0.008, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test).Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, clinical factors, and findings of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, did not differ between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in terms of surgical outcomes, including complication and failure rates, as well as clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups.Conclusion: The learning curve of SELD was not as steep as that of other minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, and the experience of surgery was not an influencing factor for outcome variation.

scholarly journals Learning curve of trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression in herniated lumbar disc disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Son ◽  
Chan Jong Yoo ◽  
Byung Rhae Yoo ◽  
Woo Seok Kim ◽  
Tae Seok Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Late Group

Abstract Background: Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) using slender epiduroscope and a holmium YAG laser is one of the minimally invasive surgical options for lumbar disc herniation.However, the learning curve of SELD and the effect of surgical proficiency on clinical outcome have not yet been established. We investigated patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing SELD to report the clinical outcome and learning curve.Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome and learning curve were performed at a single center from clinical data collected from November 2015 to November 2018. A total of 82 patients who underwent single-level SELD for lumbar disc herniation with a minimum follow-up of 6.0 months were enrolled. Based on the findings that the cut-off of familiarity was 20 cases according to the cumulative study of operation time, patients were allocated to two groups: early group (n = 20) and late group (n = 62). The surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated between the two groups to analyze the learning curve of SELD.Results: According to linear and log regression analyses, the operation time was obtained by the formula: operation time = 58.825 - (0.181 × [case number]) (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly different between the two groups (mean 56.95 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.12–64.78 in the early group versus mean 45.34 minutes; 95% CI, 42.45–48.22 in the late group; p = 0.008, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test).Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, clinical factors, and findings of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, did not differ between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in terms of surgical outcomes, including complication and failure rates, as well as clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups.Conclusion: The learning curve of SELD was not as steep as that of other minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, and the experience of surgery was not an influencing factor for outcome variation.

scholarly journals Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Factors for Prolonged Operation Time

2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-297
Author(s):  
Kuniyoshi Tsuchiya ◽  
Kenichi Kawaguchi ◽  
Satoshi Kido ◽  
Hideya Kawamura
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Prolonged Operation ◽  
Microendoscopic Discectomy

scholarly journals Learning curve of trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression in herniated lumbar disc disease

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Son ◽  
Chan Jong Yoo ◽  
Byung Rhae Yoo ◽  
Woo Seok Kim ◽  
Tae Seok Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Late Group

Abstract Background Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) using slender epiduroscope and a holmium YAG laser is one of the minimally invasive surgical options for lumbar disc herniation. However, the learning curve of SELD and the effect of surgical proficiency on clinical outcome have not yet been established. We investigated patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing SELD to report the clinical outcome and learning curve. Methods Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome and learning curve were performed at a single center from clinical data collected from November 2015 to November 2018. A total of 82 patients who underwent single-level SELD for lumbar disc herniation with a minimum follow-up of 6.0 months were enrolled. Based on the findings that the cut-off of familiarity was 20 cases according to the cumulative study of operation time, patients were allocated to two groups: early group (n = 20) and late group (n = 62). The surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated between the two groups to analyze the learning curve of SELD. Results According to linear and log regression analyses, the operation time was obtained by the formula: operation time = 58.825–(0.181 × [case number]) (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly different between the two groups (mean 56.95 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.12–64.78 in the early group versus mean 45.34 min; 95% CI, 42.45–48.22 in the late group; p = 0.008, non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test). Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, clinical factors, and findings of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, did not differ between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in terms of surgical outcomes, including complication and failure rates, as well as clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion The learning curve of SELD was not as steep as that of other minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, and the experience of surgery was not an influencing factor for outcome variation.

scholarly journals Learning curve of trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression in herniated lumbar disc disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Son ◽  
Chan Jong Yoo ◽  
Byung Rhae Yoo ◽  
Woo Seok Kim ◽  
Tae Seok Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Late Group

Abstract Background: Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) using slender epiduroscope and a holmium YAG laser is one of the minimally invasive surgical options for lumbar disc herniation.However, the learning curve of SELD and the effect of surgical proficiency on clinical outcome have not yet been established. We investigated patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing SELD to report the clinical outcome and learning curve.Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome and learning curve were performed at a single center from clinical data collected from November 2015 to November 2018. A total of 82 patients who underwent single-level SELD for lumbar disc herniation with a minimum follow-up of 6.0 months were enrolled. Based on the findings that the cut-off of familiarity was 20 cases according to the cumulative study of operation time, patients were allocated to two groups: early group (n = 20) and late group (n = 62). The surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated between the two groups to analyze the learning curve of SELD.Results: According to linear and log regression analyses, the operation time was obtained by the formula: operation time = 58.825 - (0.181 × [case number]) (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly different between the two groups (mean 56.95 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.12–64.78 in the early group versus mean 45.34 minutes; 95% CI, 42.45–48.22 in the late group; p = 0.008, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test).Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, clinical factors, and findings of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, did not differ between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in terms of surgical outcomes, including complication and failure rates, as well as clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups.Conclusion: The learning curve of SELD was not as steep as that of other minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, and the experience of surgery was not an influencing factor for outcome variation.

scholarly journals Comparison of Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy with and without Foraminoplasty for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A 2-Year Follow-Up

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binbin Wu ◽  
Gonghao Zhan ◽  
Xinyi Tian ◽  
Linyu Fan ◽  
Chenchen Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Background. Both transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with foraminoplasty (TF PELF) and transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy without foraminoplasty (TF PELD) were developed for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients. However, the safety and effectiveness between the TF PELF and TF PELD have not been investigated. Methods. Of the included 140 LDH patients, 62 patients received TF PELF (PELF group) and 78 patients received TF PELD (PELD group). The operation time, the duration of staying at the hospital, and complication incidences were recorded. All patients were followed up for 2 years, where low back and leg visual analogue scale (VAS) pain ratings and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were compared between the 2 groups before and after surgery. Modified Macnab criterion was estimated for all patients at postoperative 2 years. Results. There were no significant difference of the operation time, number of days staying at the hospital, and the incidence of complications between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Two cases in the PELF group and 1 case in the PELD group received a second surgery due to unrelieved symptoms postoperatively. Low back and leg VAS and ODI scores decreased in both groups after operation (P<0.01), respectively, but were not significant between the 2 groups over time (P>0.05). Six patients in the PELF group and 3 patients in the PELD group did not continue the follow-up; thus, only 131 patients completed Macnab evaluation. The satisfactory rate was reported as 80.4% in the PELF group and 90.7% in the PELD group (P>0.05). Conclusions. This study suggested that the safety and effectiveness of TF PELF are comparable to TF PELD for LDH patients.

Lumbar Disc Herniation in Heavy Manual Workers: Conventional Microdiscectomy versus (MIS) TLIF with Unilateral Fixation

2021 ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mohamed Alqazaz
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Disc Prolapse ◽  
Outcome Score

Introduction: Conventional discectomy is a common surgical method for treating lumbar disc prolapse. The situation may differ in heavy manual workers who may have more pronounced degenerative spine disease, broad-based disc herniations, and are expected to be exposed postoperatively to the same preoperative manual stress. This study was aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes in patients operated for conventional discectomy versus those operated for TLIF with unilateral spinal fixation. Methodology: Sixty patients underwent surgeries for lumbar disc herniation. They were divided into two groups; the microscopic conventional discectomy group and the fusion (TLIF and unilateral TPF) group. They were operated between 2017 and 2019. Participants were evaluated pre- and postoperatively at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months’ intervals. Pain was scored by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for both lower limb and back pain. The clinical outcomes were compared using the Prolo economic and functional rating scale and a new outcome score. Result: The two groups of patients were fairly homogeneous and comparable. Workload exposure to repetitive vibration was the biggest risk for disc prolapse and surgery (28.3%). Fusion group showed better clinical outcomes parameter including better VAS for back pain, better Prolo economic and functional rating scale, and better new clinical outcome score. In comparison, the discectomy group showed significantly higher recurrence rate and reoperation during the follow-up period. During the 12 months’ follow-up visit, when the patients were asked if, under the same circumstances, they would undergo the procedure again, 71.6% of the patients (43 patients) answered affirmatively and this reflects their satisfaction with the results of their surgeries. This satisfaction was reported in 27 patients (90%) in the fusion group and 16 patients (53.4%) in the discectomy group. Conclusion: Heavy manual workers treated with unilateral transforaminal interbody fusion reported less pain and lower disability scores all over the follow-up period. This technique is preferable to conventional discectomy because it reduces back and leg pain while avoiding the possibility of recurrence by heavy duties and maintains stability of the lumbar spine. We proposed a new clinical outcome score to monitor the clinical outcomes of spine surgery in heavy manual workers. It relates the outcomes to the hours of work, sick leaves, and patient satisfaction with surgery. In our group of patients, it showed significant improvement in the fusion group in comparison to the discectomy group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document