scholarly journals Cranberries for women with recurrent urinary tract infection: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-75
Author(s):  
Made Parulian Tambunan ◽  
Harrina Erlianti Rahardjo

BACKGROUND Cranberries are the most widely used nonantibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) in women; however, their efficacy still remains uncertain. Hence, this meta-analysis was aimed to assess the effectiveness, safety, and adherence of cranberry as a prophylactic drug for treating rUTI. METHODS Literature search was conducted using PubMed, EBSCO, Science Direct, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Studies were screened for duplication, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then reviewed by two authors independently. This included all randomized controlled trials of cranberry derivatives versus placebo and antibiotic prophylaxis. Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools were used to evaluate the quality of the study. Quantitative analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.0 software. RESULTS Nine studies were included. Among 1,542 participants, cranberry consumption reduced incidence of rUTI in women compared with placebo (p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis revealed that only cranberry capsules were superior to placebo (relative risk [RR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45–0.98), but not for cranberry juice (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.7–1.04). Antibiotics had better outcome than cranberry for rUTI (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70–0.98). Most of the participants experienced minor adverse events such as rash and gastrointestinal symptoms. There was also a good adherence rate, ranging from 90.3–99% monthly dose. CONCLUSIONS Cranberry, especially cranberry capsule consumption, had a significant effect in reducing the incidence of rUTI compared with placebo, with good adherence rates, and minor adverse events. In contrast, although antibiotic use had a greater efficacy, it was associated with a higher risk of severe adverse events.

2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (2) ◽  
pp. 265.e1-265.e13
Author(s):  
Stacy M. Lenger ◽  
Megan S. Bradley ◽  
Debbie A. Thomas ◽  
Marnie H. Bertolet ◽  
Jerry L. Lowder ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro G Gonzalez-Garay ◽  
Liliana Velasco-Hidalgo ◽  
Eric Ochoa-Hein ◽  
Roberto Rivera-Luna

Abstract Background Uncomplicated urinary tract infection is considered an infection that occurs in healthy individuals who have a normal urinary tract, representing 5% of all annual medical visits. Several quinolones are available as second-line agents for treatment; however, we do not know which is the best antibiotic scheme for urinary tract infection; therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to hierarchize each quinolone according to its efficacy and safety. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases were subjected to non-language-restricted searches up to 2018 for trials that included women treated with quinolones for uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Bias in the trials was assessed by two reviewers; the Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to analyze clinical and bacteriological remission, relapse, resistance, and adverse events. For direct comparisons, we obtained risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals by applying a fixed events model using Tau2 and Q2 tests to calculate the heterogeneity using trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole as the common comparator across studies. For the network meta-analysis, we analyzed the indirect comparisons by Bucher's method. The results were summarized in a correlation matrix. Results We included 18 trials with 8765 women. For pre-menopausal women and treatment duration <3 days, norfloxacin and ofloxacin had a 57% of probability for achieving remission but with an 83% frequency of adverse events. For post-menopausal women, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin were 82% more effective for remission with an 49% frequency of adverse events compared with other types of quinolones. Conclusions Compared with other quinolones, ofloxacin (200 mg) was more effective for remission, although with a high probability of adverse events; however, norfloxacin (400 mg) could be an alternative in treatment, due to it low probability of adverse events; even though additional trials are needed to confirm our findings, especially in treatment duration exceeds 3 days. PROSPERO registration CRD42015025886


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document