Prevention and Treatment of Veno-Occlusive Disease

2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 935-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita A Pegram ◽  
LeAnne D Kennedy

OBJECTIVE: T o review the current options for prevention and treatment of veno-occlusive disease in bone marrow transplant patients. DATA SOURCES: Articles were selected from a MEDLINE search (1966–October 1999) using the key terms veno-occlusive disease and bone marrow transplantation. In addition, references of all articles were examined for articles not found in the computer-based search. DATA EXTRACTION: All clinical trials, case—control studies, and case reports were evaluated. RESULTS: Heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, prostaglandin E1, ursodiol, and glutamine have been studied for prevention of veno-occlusive disease. Heparin has been studied most extensively; however, no preventive regimen has a defined role in therapy. For treatment, tissue plasminogen activator has been evaluated most thoroughly, yet its safety and efficacy have not been clearly established in patients with veno-occlusive disease. Other possible treatment options include antithrombin-III, defibrotide, glutamine plus vitamin E, and surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available data, the most promising agents are ursodiol for prevention and defibrotide or glutamine plus vitamin E for treatment of veno-occlusive disease. Further clinical trials are needed to establish the appropriate preventive and treatment options available for bone marrow transplant patients suffering from veno-occlusive disease. To date, such decisions depend largely on poorly designed trials, case reports, and clinical experience.

2000 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. A971
Author(s):  
Sreelatha Reddy ◽  
Lakshmi Reddy ◽  
Alice Chuang ◽  
Richard Champlin ◽  
Victor Ankoma-Sey

2000 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S296
Author(s):  
Sreelatha Reddy ◽  
Lakshmi Reddy ◽  
Alice Chuang ◽  
Richard Champlin ◽  
Victor Ankoma-Sey

Author(s):  
Cameron K. Ledford ◽  
Alexander R. Vap ◽  
Michael P. Bolognesi ◽  
Samuel S. Wellman

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S198-S199
Author(s):  
P. Emerson ◽  
S. Mahendran ◽  
L. Stefani ◽  
T. Deshmukh ◽  
S. Trivedi ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan S Biel ◽  
Andreas Nitsche ◽  
Andreas Kurth ◽  
Wolfgang Siegert ◽  
Muhsin Özel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: We studied electron microscopy (EM) as an appropriate test system for the detection of polyomavirus in urine samples from bone marrow transplant patients. Methods: We evaluated direct EM, ultracentrifugation (UC) before EM, and solid-phase immuno-EM (SPIEM). The diagnostic accuracy of EM was studied by comparison with a real-time PCR assay on 531 clinical samples. Results: The detection rate of EM was increased by UC and SPIEM. On 531 clinical urine samples, the diagnostic sensitivity of EM was 47% (70 of 149) with a specificity of 100%. We observed a linear relationship between viral genome concentration and the proportion of urine samples positive by EM, with a 50% probability for a positive EM result for urine samples with a polyomavirus concentration of 106 genome-equivalents (GE)/mL; the probability of a positive EM result was 0% for urine samples with <103 GE/mL and 100% for urine samples containing 109 GE/mL. Conclusions: UC/EM is rapid and highly specific for polyomavirus in urine. Unlike real-time PCR, EM has low sensitivity and cannot quantify the viral load.


BMJ ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 1 (5739) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. O. Solberg ◽  
H. J. Meuwissen ◽  
R. N. Needham ◽  
R. A. Good ◽  
J. M. Matsen

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohail Khattak ◽  
John W. Rogan ◽  
E. Fred Saunders ◽  
Jochen G. W. Theis ◽  
Gerald S. Arbus ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document