Mitiku Haile, Diress Tsegaye, and Tegegne Teka, eds. Research and Development on Dryland Husbandry in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Organization for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern African (OSSREA), 2004. Distributed by African Books Collective Ltd., Unit 13 Kings Meadow, Ferry Hinksey Rd., Oxford OX2 0DP. viii + 174 pp. Photographs. Bibliography. $19.95. Paper. - Elly N. Sabiiti and Tegegne Teka, eds. Dryland Husbandry in Uganda: Community Participation and Development. Addis Ababa: OSSREA, 2004. Distributed by African Books Collective Ltd. vii + 98 pp. Photographs. Bibliography. $19.95. Paper. - Nashon K. R. Musimba, et al. Dryland Husbandry for Sustainable Development in the Southern Rangelands of Kenya. Addis Ababa: OSSREA, 2004. Distributed by African Books Collective Ltd. x + 117 pp. Photographs. Bibliography. $19.95. Paper. - Muna M. M. Ahmed, Mohamed Fadl Elmoula Idris, and Tegegne Teka, eds. Dryland Husbandry in the Sudan: Grassroots Experience and Development. Addis Ababa: OSSREA, 2004. Distributed by African Books Collective Ltd. xii + 109 pp. Photographs. Bibliography. $19.95. Paper.

2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 71-73
Author(s):  
Mark Moritz
2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 1563-1571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meritxell Martell ◽  
Kris Van Berendoncks

AbstractThe European InSOTEC project aims to identify remaining socio-technical challenges for the implementation of geological disposal of radioactive waste in European countries. Geological disposal has been recognized as the reference solution in radioactive waste management by the European Commission, which has set up the IGD-TP as a platform to foster exchanges between authorities on research and development (R&D) on this topic. This paper turns to the national level to analyse national R&D programmes on radioactive waste management (RWM) and particularly, geological disposal (GD) in order to assess to what extent there are national platforms that broaden interaction beyond an expert community. For this, we focus on identifying those practices and structures that reflect a degree of inter- and transdisciplinarity in the design and implementation of national R&D programmes. Our argument, embedded in the Science and Technology Studies (STS) literature, is that the way GD is framed by the research and policy community has important implications for the processes of developing and governing a technology. From our empirical case studies, we will explore the extent to which social-science research is integrated and the way stakeholders may have an impact on the development of R&D programmes. Overall, including social science research as an integral part in R&D programmes on GD and fostering collaboration between different types of knowledge in the R&D agenda-setting phase may help in the consideration of GD as a socio-technical problem, where the social and the technical are inextricably linked.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document